Guest guest Posted February 10, 2007 Report Share Posted February 10, 2007 hinduism_in_nepal "Vrndavan Parker" <vrnparker > Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:43:20 -0000 [hinduism_in_nepal] Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT MAOISM BRILLIANT! I WILL SHARE IT WIDELY! hinduism_in_nepal, "krantimarg" wrote: > > Brothers, > > The alliances against us which we are supposed to be avoiding are > already there. We cannot avoid what is accomplished fact. So let's > get back to reality. > > There are two things that we must understand: (1) that according to > the Shastras, the Himsa that is done in accordance with Dharma must > be regarded as Ahimsa. Righteous War (Dharma Yuddha) against Adharma > is enshrined in our Hindu Shastras and does not qualify as Himsa; > and (2) that it is imperative to understand the nature of the Maoist > enemy. > > The Maoists are saying that the Capitalists are a confused lot. But > the truth of the matter is that the Maoists themselves are an even > more confused lot than the Capitalists. In fact, they don't even > know what they are talking about. > > Mao said: "If you have not investigated a certain problem, you will > lose your right to speak on it." If this is the case, let us > investigate this myth called Communism. > > Communism says it wants to create a society where all people are > equal. All right, so let's take a look at Russia and China. Are all > Russians and Chinese equal? No. Some are billionaires and others > have nothing to eat, just as in Capitalism. > > Communism says it wants to create a society without money, where > people get what they need and nobody lacks anything. Is there such a > society in Russia and China? No. Money in Russia and China is as > important as in the Capitalist world. > > Communism says that land is taken away from rich landowners and > given to the landless peasants. Mao himself promised this to the > masses. This is why the peasants supported his revolution in the > first place. But this is a typical Communist lie. The truth is that > Communism aims at abolishing all private property. Mao did indeed > imprison and execute millions of landowners and gave the land to the > poor. This made him popular with the masses. But as soon as he came > to power, he started implementing the true Communist policies. > > First, he got groups of five or six families to join their farms > into a co-operative where land was worked collectively and the > income was shared. Second, he got a whole village to join a larger > co-operative. Third, he got several villages to join an even larger > co-operative. From there to State-owned land it was not far. > > Before the peasants even understood what was happening, their land > was regarded as belonging not to each family as promised by Mao but > as property of the co-operative! The State-controlled co-operative, > of course, would keep most of the income for itself and invest it in > properties for the leadership and in industrialisation projects > outside the countryside. Instead of the peasants' hard-earned money > being put back into the villages, it invariably ended up elsewhere, > just as in pre-revolutionary times. > > So, once again, farmers were reduced to poverty, this time not by > Feudalists, not by Capitalists but by Maoists themselves. Their > children were forced to go and work for peanut-wages in factories in > the town. By 1962, 30 million people died of starvation! It was only > in 1979 that the Maoist leadership began to dismantle co-operatives > and give some of the land back to the peasants. > > Communism says that the more a society advances on the path of > Communism, the less power the State holds, the aim being to abolish > the State completely. Is there such a society in Russia or China or > any other Communist country? No. On the contrary, the more Communist > a country becomes, the more powerful the State becomes. In the end, > the State holds all the power and the people hold no power at all. > The State in Communist countries holds even more power than in > Capitalist ones. So it is all fantasy. It is all lies. > > The fact is that Russia and China are giving up Communism, indeed, > they have given it up already because Communism, in practice, does > not work out and never will. Communism is not a progression from > Capitalism. It is just a scam. It is a delusional experiment by mad > intellectuals at the cost of the people. > > All the countries that have tried out Communism are now reverting > back to Capitalism. Why? Because Capitalism may be cruel, unfair and > unjust, but at least it works better than Communism. Capitalism is a > failure in the sense that it has failed to provide justice and > equality for all people. But Communism is an even bigger failure. > > The truth is that ordinary Maoists are very confused people. They > think that their lives are better under Communism. But they have > never lived in a Communist country, so how can they know? They don't > understand that their leaders promise them all kinds of things now. > But when the leaders come to power, then everything will change. The > people will demand what was promised to them and the leaders will > not be able to deliver. Then the deportations and the mass murders > and the genocides will begin. The Maoist leaders will become the new > oppressors because they will not let go of power. So they will > ruthlessly put the people down. > > Like in Russia and China, the Communist leaders will take all the > power and the people will have no power at all. They will have no > money, they will have no land, they will have no work, they will > have no food. Like in Russia and China, people will have to stand in > line all day waiting to buy bread or rice if they are lucky. > > People will be completely powerless. They will have no guns to > defend themselves against the oppressive leaders. Their guns will be > taken away from them as soon as the leaders have come to power. The > leaders do not want any competition or challenge to their authority. > So they will demand complete submission to their rule. > > This is very important to understand. When a Maoist has a gun, he > feels that he is somebody. He feels that he has power over other > people. This is a new experience for him. He gets high on power. He > goes around shooting landlords and officials and raping their wives, > daughters and sisters. This makes him feel important. He thinks > Maoism is the real thing, the real life for a man. > > The Maoist thinks that when the revolution is over, he will keep his > Kalashnikov or his Enfield and retire on his State-provided farm. > That is what every Maoist dreams of. But he is only deluding > himself. In reality he is only a "useful idiot" (as the Communist > saying goes) in the power games of the Maoist leadership. > > When the revolution is over and the "Feudalists" and "Capitalists" > have been liquidated, and his gun has been taken away from him, then > the Maoist revolutionary is powerless. He is like a dog people throw > stones and sticks at and there is absolutely nothing he can do about > it. This is the true story of the Maoist. He is born like a dog, he > will have power for a few days or a few years and then he will live > and die like a dog again. When Mao's wife was arrested and put on > trial by the Communist Party, she said: "I was Mao's dog. I bit > whoever he asked me to bite". This is the truth. > > Mao was a great revolutionary. He was a great fighter. He was a > great guerrilla leader. We must respect him for that. We can learn a > lot from him in this regard. But at the same time we must clearly > understand that he was a lousy economist. He didn't know what an > economy needs in order to work. He didn't understand what a country > needs to prosper. > > In fact, apart from history, politics and revolutionary warfare, Mao > didn't know much at all. And after the Revolution, he knew even > less. In the end, he was completely cut off from the people and from > the country. He was living in a big house with plenty of food and > everything he wanted. He married three or four times. Young village > girls were brought to him every day to keep him young. He lived like > a God on Earth. He had no idea what life was like for the people. > When he visited a village, the streets were repaired, the houses > were redecorated, people had new clothes and there was food > everywhere. After his visit, poverty and misery came back to the > same village. > > Chin Peng, a Communist guerrilla leader in the 1940s, fought for > over twenty years to establish Communism in Malaya. He first fought > against the Japanese. When the Japanese were defeated, he fought > against the British. When the British were defeated, he didn't know > what to do. He said: "I have great experience of struggle, but not > how to build Socialism". He went back to the jungle. > > The same applies to Mao, to Lenin, to Castro and to all Communist > revolutionaries. They are great fighters and great military leaders. > But when the fighting is over, they all fail. Why? Because > Communism was invented by Karl Marx, a German/Dutch Jew, who was a > philosopher and a fantasist. He never had any experience of > Communism. He made it all up in his own mind. > > Yes, there was poverty. Yes, there was suffering. Yes, there was > exploitation. Yes, there was injustice in European Capitalism as > there was in Russian and Chinese "Feudalism". And yes, something had > to be done about it. But the answer was not Communism. The answer > could not have been Communism simply because nobody knew what > Communism was. Karl Marx saw the German and French Revolutions of > 1848 and 1871 and he thought that a Communist Revolution would solve > all the problems. But he only thought so. > > Marx had no time to see Communism being put into practice. The > German and French Revolutions failed and he died in 1883, in London, > the centre of the Capitalist and Imperialist world. What practical > experience of his own theories could he have had? > > The first Communist Revolution where Communists actually took and > held power was in Russia, long after the death of Marx. When Lenin > himself staged his Russian Revolution in 1917, he had no idea what > he was doing. He was merely hoping that Marx's Communist theories > would work. The same happened to Mao who copied Lenin. Mao was an > intellectual kept by his hard-working peasant father. He had no > practical experience of Communism. The only experience he had was of > guerrilla warfare. > > What most people don't realise is that Mao's authority did not come > from his successful establishment of Communism in China but from his > guerrilla war against Japan. In this respect, he was just like Chin > Peng. Like Chin Peng, Lenin, and other Communist leaders, once the > war was over, the great Chairman Mao had no idea what to do. > > The Chinese, of course, were not stupid. They soon realised that > Communism wasn't working as expected and tried to introduce > Capitalist measures to repair the damage Communism had done to the > economy. But with Mao and his wife in charge, this was not possible. > And because Mao was a powerful symbol of the Revolution and people > worshipped him like a God, no one dared touch him. As a result, the > people suffered for decades. The suffering of the Chinese, Tibetan > and other people affected by Maoism is beyond description. > > When Mao finally died in 1976, he left China one of the poorest and > most backward countries on Earth, with a big Communist Party, a big > Communist Army, but no food to feed its people. Tens of millions of > people had died of starvation and Maoist China was importing food > from its Capitalist enemies. Mao's powerful wife was arrested and > tried for treason just a few weeks later. In the end she committed > suicide. > > In 1979, three years after his death, China began to abolish the > Communist co-operative system. Peasants got some of their land back. > In 1981, the Chinese Communist Party publicly criticised Mao for his > policies. This was the end of Maoism in China. Ever since then, the > leadership has slowly introduced more and more Capitalist methods > back into the Chinese system and the semi-Capitalist Chinese economy > is now enjoying unprecedented strength. > > In "On Guerrilla Warfare", Lenin said: "It is unconditionally > requisite that history be investigated in order to discover the > conditions of environment, the state of the economic progress, the > political ideas that obtained, the national characteristics, customs > and degree of civilisation." If this is so, why can not the Maoists > of today study the historical failure of Maoism in China before they > even start their revolution elsewhere? > > Unlike the Maoists, we have followed Lenin's advice and studied > history thoroughly. We have studied the teachings of Communism and > we have studied the results of these teachings on the ground. As a > result, we can now look at the Maoists of Nepal, India, South > America and other places and clearly understand what a confused lot > they are. They deliberately ignore history and desperately cling on > to the dreams of Karl Marx, Lenin, Mao and a string of other deluded > political fantasists. A dream that cannot and never will find > fulfilment on this Earth. > > Mao said that people should not read too many books. But he himself > read – and wrote – many books. Did he not want people to read his > books? Was he afraid that people would find out the truth? At any > rate, the books he read and believed in were books written by > fantasists who themselves believed the fantasies of others before > them. This is how Adharma works. It is a self-perpetuating, > destructive force that does not rest from doing evil until it is > defeated. Therefore, it is the duty of all right-believing people to > wipe Adharma off the face of the Earth. The destruction of Maoism is > a good start. > > UNITE HINDUS! > ARISE AND FIGHT! > DESTROY ALL ADHARMA ON EARTH! > > Anand > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2007 Report Share Posted February 10, 2007 hinduism_in_nepal "Vrndavan Parker" <vrnparker > Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:43:20 -0000 [hinduism_in_nepal] Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT MAOISM BRILLIANT! I WILL SHARE IT WIDELY! hinduism_in_nepal, "krantimarg" wrote: > > Brothers, > > The alliances against us which we are supposed to be avoiding are > already there. We cannot avoid what is accomplished fact. So let's > get back to reality. > > There are two things that we must understand: (1) that according to > the Shastras, the Himsa that is done in accordance with Dharma must > be regarded as Ahimsa. Righteous War (Dharma Yuddha) against Adharma > is enshrined in our Hindu Shastras and does not qualify as Himsa; > and (2) that it is imperative to understand the nature of the Maoist > enemy. > > The Maoists are saying that the Capitalists are a confused lot. But > the truth of the matter is that the Maoists themselves are an even > more confused lot than the Capitalists. In fact, they don't even > know what they are talking about. > > Mao said: "If you have not investigated a certain problem, you will > lose your right to speak on it." If this is the case, let us > investigate this myth called Communism. > > Communism says it wants to create a society where all people are > equal. All right, so let's take a look at Russia and China. Are all > Russians and Chinese equal? No. Some are billionaires and others > have nothing to eat, just as in Capitalism. > > Communism says it wants to create a society without money, where > people get what they need and nobody lacks anything. Is there such a > society in Russia and China? No. Money in Russia and China is as > important as in the Capitalist world. > > Communism says that land is taken away from rich landowners and > given to the landless peasants. Mao himself promised this to the > masses. This is why the peasants supported his revolution in the > first place. But this is a typical Communist lie. The truth is that > Communism aims at abolishing all private property. Mao did indeed > imprison and execute millions of landowners and gave the land to the > poor. This made him popular with the masses. But as soon as he came > to power, he started implementing the true Communist policies. > > First, he got groups of five or six families to join their farms > into a co-operative where land was worked collectively and the > income was shared. Second, he got a whole village to join a larger > co-operative. Third, he got several villages to join an even larger > co-operative. From there to State-owned land it was not far. > > Before the peasants even understood what was happening, their land > was regarded as belonging not to each family as promised by Mao but > as property of the co-operative! The State-controlled co-operative, > of course, would keep most of the income for itself and invest it in > properties for the leadership and in industrialisation projects > outside the countryside. Instead of the peasants' hard-earned money > being put back into the villages, it invariably ended up elsewhere, > just as in pre-revolutionary times. > > So, once again, farmers were reduced to poverty, this time not by > Feudalists, not by Capitalists but by Maoists themselves. Their > children were forced to go and work for peanut-wages in factories in > the town. By 1962, 30 million people died of starvation! It was only > in 1979 that the Maoist leadership began to dismantle co-operatives > and give some of the land back to the peasants. > > Communism says that the more a society advances on the path of > Communism, the less power the State holds, the aim being to abolish > the State completely. Is there such a society in Russia or China or > any other Communist country? No. On the contrary, the more Communist > a country becomes, the more powerful the State becomes. In the end, > the State holds all the power and the people hold no power at all. > The State in Communist countries holds even more power than in > Capitalist ones. So it is all fantasy. It is all lies. > > The fact is that Russia and China are giving up Communism, indeed, > they have given it up already because Communism, in practice, does > not work out and never will. Communism is not a progression from > Capitalism. It is just a scam. It is a delusional experiment by mad > intellectuals at the cost of the people. > > All the countries that have tried out Communism are now reverting > back to Capitalism. Why? Because Capitalism may be cruel, unfair and > unjust, but at least it works better than Communism. Capitalism is a > failure in the sense that it has failed to provide justice and > equality for all people. But Communism is an even bigger failure. > > The truth is that ordinary Maoists are very confused people. They > think that their lives are better under Communism. But they have > never lived in a Communist country, so how can they know? They don't > understand that their leaders promise them all kinds of things now. > But when the leaders come to power, then everything will change. The > people will demand what was promised to them and the leaders will > not be able to deliver. Then the deportations and the mass murders > and the genocides will begin. The Maoist leaders will become the new > oppressors because they will not let go of power. So they will > ruthlessly put the people down. > > Like in Russia and China, the Communist leaders will take all the > power and the people will have no power at all. They will have no > money, they will have no land, they will have no work, they will > have no food. Like in Russia and China, people will have to stand in > line all day waiting to buy bread or rice if they are lucky. > > People will be completely powerless. They will have no guns to > defend themselves against the oppressive leaders. Their guns will be > taken away from them as soon as the leaders have come to power. The > leaders do not want any competition or challenge to their authority. > So they will demand complete submission to their rule. > > This is very important to understand. When a Maoist has a gun, he > feels that he is somebody. He feels that he has power over other > people. This is a new experience for him. He gets high on power. He > goes around shooting landlords and officials and raping their wives, > daughters and sisters. This makes him feel important. He thinks > Maoism is the real thing, the real life for a man. > > The Maoist thinks that when the revolution is over, he will keep his > Kalashnikov or his Enfield and retire on his State-provided farm. > That is what every Maoist dreams of. But he is only deluding > himself. In reality he is only a "useful idiot" (as the Communist > saying goes) in the power games of the Maoist leadership. > > When the revolution is over and the "Feudalists" and "Capitalists" > have been liquidated, and his gun has been taken away from him, then > the Maoist revolutionary is powerless. He is like a dog people throw > stones and sticks at and there is absolutely nothing he can do about > it. This is the true story of the Maoist. He is born like a dog, he > will have power for a few days or a few years and then he will live > and die like a dog again. When Mao's wife was arrested and put on > trial by the Communist Party, she said: "I was Mao's dog. I bit > whoever he asked me to bite". This is the truth. > > Mao was a great revolutionary. He was a great fighter. He was a > great guerrilla leader. We must respect him for that. We can learn a > lot from him in this regard. But at the same time we must clearly > understand that he was a lousy economist. He didn't know what an > economy needs in order to work. He didn't understand what a country > needs to prosper. > > In fact, apart from history, politics and revolutionary warfare, Mao > didn't know much at all. And after the Revolution, he knew even > less. In the end, he was completely cut off from the people and from > the country. He was living in a big house with plenty of food and > everything he wanted. He married three or four times. Young village > girls were brought to him every day to keep him young. He lived like > a God on Earth. He had no idea what life was like for the people. > When he visited a village, the streets were repaired, the houses > were redecorated, people had new clothes and there was food > everywhere. After his visit, poverty and misery came back to the > same village. > > Chin Peng, a Communist guerrilla leader in the 1940s, fought for > over twenty years to establish Communism in Malaya. He first fought > against the Japanese. When the Japanese were defeated, he fought > against the British. When the British were defeated, he didn't know > what to do. He said: "I have great experience of struggle, but not > how to build Socialism". He went back to the jungle. > > The same applies to Mao, to Lenin, to Castro and to all Communist > revolutionaries. They are great fighters and great military leaders. > But when the fighting is over, they all fail. Why? Because > Communism was invented by Karl Marx, a German/Dutch Jew, who was a > philosopher and a fantasist. He never had any experience of > Communism. He made it all up in his own mind. > > Yes, there was poverty. Yes, there was suffering. Yes, there was > exploitation. Yes, there was injustice in European Capitalism as > there was in Russian and Chinese "Feudalism". And yes, something had > to be done about it. But the answer was not Communism. The answer > could not have been Communism simply because nobody knew what > Communism was. Karl Marx saw the German and French Revolutions of > 1848 and 1871 and he thought that a Communist Revolution would solve > all the problems. But he only thought so. > > Marx had no time to see Communism being put into practice. The > German and French Revolutions failed and he died in 1883, in London, > the centre of the Capitalist and Imperialist world. What practical > experience of his own theories could he have had? > > The first Communist Revolution where Communists actually took and > held power was in Russia, long after the death of Marx. When Lenin > himself staged his Russian Revolution in 1917, he had no idea what > he was doing. He was merely hoping that Marx's Communist theories > would work. The same happened to Mao who copied Lenin. Mao was an > intellectual kept by his hard-working peasant father. He had no > practical experience of Communism. The only experience he had was of > guerrilla warfare. > > What most people don't realise is that Mao's authority did not come > from his successful establishment of Communism in China but from his > guerrilla war against Japan. In this respect, he was just like Chin > Peng. Like Chin Peng, Lenin, and other Communist leaders, once the > war was over, the great Chairman Mao had no idea what to do. > > The Chinese, of course, were not stupid. They soon realised that > Communism wasn't working as expected and tried to introduce > Capitalist measures to repair the damage Communism had done to the > economy. But with Mao and his wife in charge, this was not possible. > And because Mao was a powerful symbol of the Revolution and people > worshipped him like a God, no one dared touch him. As a result, the > people suffered for decades. The suffering of the Chinese, Tibetan > and other people affected by Maoism is beyond description. > > When Mao finally died in 1976, he left China one of the poorest and > most backward countries on Earth, with a big Communist Party, a big > Communist Army, but no food to feed its people. Tens of millions of > people had died of starvation and Maoist China was importing food > from its Capitalist enemies. Mao's powerful wife was arrested and > tried for treason just a few weeks later. In the end she committed > suicide. > > In 1979, three years after his death, China began to abolish the > Communist co-operative system. Peasants got some of their land back. > In 1981, the Chinese Communist Party publicly criticised Mao for his > policies. This was the end of Maoism in China. Ever since then, the > leadership has slowly introduced more and more Capitalist methods > back into the Chinese system and the semi-Capitalist Chinese economy > is now enjoying unprecedented strength. > > In "On Guerrilla Warfare", Lenin said: "It is unconditionally > requisite that history be investigated in order to discover the > conditions of environment, the state of the economic progress, the > political ideas that obtained, the national characteristics, customs > and degree of civilisation." If this is so, why can not the Maoists > of today study the historical failure of Maoism in China before they > even start their revolution elsewhere? > > Unlike the Maoists, we have followed Lenin's advice and studied > history thoroughly. We have studied the teachings of Communism and > we have studied the results of these teachings on the ground. As a > result, we can now look at the Maoists of Nepal, India, South > America and other places and clearly understand what a confused lot > they are. They deliberately ignore history and desperately cling on > to the dreams of Karl Marx, Lenin, Mao and a string of other deluded > political fantasists. A dream that cannot and never will find > fulfilment on this Earth. > > Mao said that people should not read too many books. But he himself > read – and wrote – many books. Did he not want people to read his > books? Was he afraid that people would find out the truth? At any > rate, the books he read and believed in were books written by > fantasists who themselves believed the fantasies of others before > them. This is how Adharma works. It is a self-perpetuating, > destructive force that does not rest from doing evil until it is > defeated. Therefore, it is the duty of all right-believing people to > wipe Adharma off the face of the Earth. The destruction of Maoism is > a good start. > > UNITE HINDUS! > ARISE AND FIGHT! > DESTROY ALL ADHARMA ON EARTH! > > Anand > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2007 Report Share Posted February 10, 2007 hinduism_in_nepal "Vrndavan Parker" <vrnparker > Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:43:20 -0000 [hinduism_in_nepal] Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT MAOISM BRILLIANT! I WILL SHARE IT WIDELY! hinduism_in_nepal, "krantimarg" wrote: > > Brothers, > > The alliances against us which we are supposed to be avoiding are > already there. We cannot avoid what is accomplished fact. So let's > get back to reality. > > There are two things that we must understand: (1) that according to > the Shastras, the Himsa that is done in accordance with Dharma must > be regarded as Ahimsa. Righteous War (Dharma Yuddha) against Adharma > is enshrined in our Hindu Shastras and does not qualify as Himsa; > and (2) that it is imperative to understand the nature of the Maoist > enemy. > > The Maoists are saying that the Capitalists are a confused lot. But > the truth of the matter is that the Maoists themselves are an even > more confused lot than the Capitalists. In fact, they don't even > know what they are talking about. > > Mao said: "If you have not investigated a certain problem, you will > lose your right to speak on it." If this is the case, let us > investigate this myth called Communism. > > Communism says it wants to create a society where all people are > equal. All right, so let's take a look at Russia and China. Are all > Russians and Chinese equal? No. Some are billionaires and others > have nothing to eat, just as in Capitalism. > > Communism says it wants to create a society without money, where > people get what they need and nobody lacks anything. Is there such a > society in Russia and China? No. Money in Russia and China is as > important as in the Capitalist world. > > Communism says that land is taken away from rich landowners and > given to the landless peasants. Mao himself promised this to the > masses. This is why the peasants supported his revolution in the > first place. But this is a typical Communist lie. The truth is that > Communism aims at abolishing all private property. Mao did indeed > imprison and execute millions of landowners and gave the land to the > poor. This made him popular with the masses. But as soon as he came > to power, he started implementing the true Communist policies. > > First, he got groups of five or six families to join their farms > into a co-operative where land was worked collectively and the > income was shared. Second, he got a whole village to join a larger > co-operative. Third, he got several villages to join an even larger > co-operative. From there to State-owned land it was not far. > > Before the peasants even understood what was happening, their land > was regarded as belonging not to each family as promised by Mao but > as property of the co-operative! The State-controlled co-operative, > of course, would keep most of the income for itself and invest it in > properties for the leadership and in industrialisation projects > outside the countryside. Instead of the peasants' hard-earned money > being put back into the villages, it invariably ended up elsewhere, > just as in pre-revolutionary times. > > So, once again, farmers were reduced to poverty, this time not by > Feudalists, not by Capitalists but by Maoists themselves. Their > children were forced to go and work for peanut-wages in factories in > the town. By 1962, 30 million people died of starvation! It was only > in 1979 that the Maoist leadership began to dismantle co-operatives > and give some of the land back to the peasants. > > Communism says that the more a society advances on the path of > Communism, the less power the State holds, the aim being to abolish > the State completely. Is there such a society in Russia or China or > any other Communist country? No. On the contrary, the more Communist > a country becomes, the more powerful the State becomes. In the end, > the State holds all the power and the people hold no power at all. > The State in Communist countries holds even more power than in > Capitalist ones. So it is all fantasy. It is all lies. > > The fact is that Russia and China are giving up Communism, indeed, > they have given it up already because Communism, in practice, does > not work out and never will. Communism is not a progression from > Capitalism. It is just a scam. It is a delusional experiment by mad > intellectuals at the cost of the people. > > All the countries that have tried out Communism are now reverting > back to Capitalism. Why? Because Capitalism may be cruel, unfair and > unjust, but at least it works better than Communism. Capitalism is a > failure in the sense that it has failed to provide justice and > equality for all people. But Communism is an even bigger failure. > > The truth is that ordinary Maoists are very confused people. They > think that their lives are better under Communism. But they have > never lived in a Communist country, so how can they know? They don't > understand that their leaders promise them all kinds of things now. > But when the leaders come to power, then everything will change. The > people will demand what was promised to them and the leaders will > not be able to deliver. Then the deportations and the mass murders > and the genocides will begin. The Maoist leaders will become the new > oppressors because they will not let go of power. So they will > ruthlessly put the people down. > > Like in Russia and China, the Communist leaders will take all the > power and the people will have no power at all. They will have no > money, they will have no land, they will have no work, they will > have no food. Like in Russia and China, people will have to stand in > line all day waiting to buy bread or rice if they are lucky. > > People will be completely powerless. They will have no guns to > defend themselves against the oppressive leaders. Their guns will be > taken away from them as soon as the leaders have come to power. The > leaders do not want any competition or challenge to their authority. > So they will demand complete submission to their rule. > > This is very important to understand. When a Maoist has a gun, he > feels that he is somebody. He feels that he has power over other > people. This is a new experience for him. He gets high on power. He > goes around shooting landlords and officials and raping their wives, > daughters and sisters. This makes him feel important. He thinks > Maoism is the real thing, the real life for a man. > > The Maoist thinks that when the revolution is over, he will keep his > Kalashnikov or his Enfield and retire on his State-provided farm. > That is what every Maoist dreams of. But he is only deluding > himself. In reality he is only a "useful idiot" (as the Communist > saying goes) in the power games of the Maoist leadership. > > When the revolution is over and the "Feudalists" and "Capitalists" > have been liquidated, and his gun has been taken away from him, then > the Maoist revolutionary is powerless. He is like a dog people throw > stones and sticks at and there is absolutely nothing he can do about > it. This is the true story of the Maoist. He is born like a dog, he > will have power for a few days or a few years and then he will live > and die like a dog again. When Mao's wife was arrested and put on > trial by the Communist Party, she said: "I was Mao's dog. I bit > whoever he asked me to bite". This is the truth. > > Mao was a great revolutionary. He was a great fighter. He was a > great guerrilla leader. We must respect him for that. We can learn a > lot from him in this regard. But at the same time we must clearly > understand that he was a lousy economist. He didn't know what an > economy needs in order to work. He didn't understand what a country > needs to prosper. > > In fact, apart from history, politics and revolutionary warfare, Mao > didn't know much at all. And after the Revolution, he knew even > less. In the end, he was completely cut off from the people and from > the country. He was living in a big house with plenty of food and > everything he wanted. He married three or four times. Young village > girls were brought to him every day to keep him young. He lived like > a God on Earth. He had no idea what life was like for the people. > When he visited a village, the streets were repaired, the houses > were redecorated, people had new clothes and there was food > everywhere. After his visit, poverty and misery came back to the > same village. > > Chin Peng, a Communist guerrilla leader in the 1940s, fought for > over twenty years to establish Communism in Malaya. He first fought > against the Japanese. When the Japanese were defeated, he fought > against the British. When the British were defeated, he didn't know > what to do. He said: "I have great experience of struggle, but not > how to build Socialism". He went back to the jungle. > > The same applies to Mao, to Lenin, to Castro and to all Communist > revolutionaries. They are great fighters and great military leaders. > But when the fighting is over, they all fail. Why? Because > Communism was invented by Karl Marx, a German/Dutch Jew, who was a > philosopher and a fantasist. He never had any experience of > Communism. He made it all up in his own mind. > > Yes, there was poverty. Yes, there was suffering. Yes, there was > exploitation. Yes, there was injustice in European Capitalism as > there was in Russian and Chinese "Feudalism". And yes, something had > to be done about it. But the answer was not Communism. The answer > could not have been Communism simply because nobody knew what > Communism was. Karl Marx saw the German and French Revolutions of > 1848 and 1871 and he thought that a Communist Revolution would solve > all the problems. But he only thought so. > > Marx had no time to see Communism being put into practice. The > German and French Revolutions failed and he died in 1883, in London, > the centre of the Capitalist and Imperialist world. What practical > experience of his own theories could he have had? > > The first Communist Revolution where Communists actually took and > held power was in Russia, long after the death of Marx. When Lenin > himself staged his Russian Revolution in 1917, he had no idea what > he was doing. He was merely hoping that Marx's Communist theories > would work. The same happened to Mao who copied Lenin. Mao was an > intellectual kept by his hard-working peasant father. He had no > practical experience of Communism. The only experience he had was of > guerrilla warfare. > > What most people don't realise is that Mao's authority did not come > from his successful establishment of Communism in China but from his > guerrilla war against Japan. In this respect, he was just like Chin > Peng. Like Chin Peng, Lenin, and other Communist leaders, once the > war was over, the great Chairman Mao had no idea what to do. > > The Chinese, of course, were not stupid. They soon realised that > Communism wasn't working as expected and tried to introduce > Capitalist measures to repair the damage Communism had done to the > economy. But with Mao and his wife in charge, this was not possible. > And because Mao was a powerful symbol of the Revolution and people > worshipped him like a God, no one dared touch him. As a result, the > people suffered for decades. The suffering of the Chinese, Tibetan > and other people affected by Maoism is beyond description. > > When Mao finally died in 1976, he left China one of the poorest and > most backward countries on Earth, with a big Communist Party, a big > Communist Army, but no food to feed its people. Tens of millions of > people had died of starvation and Maoist China was importing food > from its Capitalist enemies. Mao's powerful wife was arrested and > tried for treason just a few weeks later. In the end she committed > suicide. > > In 1979, three years after his death, China began to abolish the > Communist co-operative system. Peasants got some of their land back. > In 1981, the Chinese Communist Party publicly criticised Mao for his > policies. This was the end of Maoism in China. Ever since then, the > leadership has slowly introduced more and more Capitalist methods > back into the Chinese system and the semi-Capitalist Chinese economy > is now enjoying unprecedented strength. > > In "On Guerrilla Warfare", Lenin said: "It is unconditionally > requisite that history be investigated in order to discover the > conditions of environment, the state of the economic progress, the > political ideas that obtained, the national characteristics, customs > and degree of civilisation." If this is so, why can not the Maoists > of today study the historical failure of Maoism in China before they > even start their revolution elsewhere? > > Unlike the Maoists, we have followed Lenin's advice and studied > history thoroughly. We have studied the teachings of Communism and > we have studied the results of these teachings on the ground. As a > result, we can now look at the Maoists of Nepal, India, South > America and other places and clearly understand what a confused lot > they are. They deliberately ignore history and desperately cling on > to the dreams of Karl Marx, Lenin, Mao and a string of other deluded > political fantasists. A dream that cannot and never will find > fulfilment on this Earth. > > Mao said that people should not read too many books. But he himself > read – and wrote – many books. Did he not want people to read his > books? Was he afraid that people would find out the truth? At any > rate, the books he read and believed in were books written by > fantasists who themselves believed the fantasies of others before > them. This is how Adharma works. It is a self-perpetuating, > destructive force that does not rest from doing evil until it is > defeated. Therefore, it is the duty of all right-believing people to > wipe Adharma off the face of the Earth. The destruction of Maoism is > a good start. > > UNITE HINDUS! > ARISE AND FIGHT! > DESTROY ALL ADHARMA ON EARTH! > > Anand > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.