need advise & guidance

[Guest guest]

i request all rudraksh knowledgable people to advise on the folowing....

which rudraksh bead is better the himalayan bead or the nepali bead..?

here in my above statement i am speaking in terms of the potency,power & effects..?

also which rudraksh bead size is better viz-the normal size or the collector giant size.?

pls advise and guide me and help me make a decision...

thanks...

 

 

Vikrant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

[Guest guest]

Dear Pandit arjun ji,

 

Is there is a book or document which says how to do purified, sanctified,

energised and programmed rudraksha. Please suggest. Please suggest us the

links to understand this process.

 

With best regards,

J.Sridhar

 

On 2/10/07, panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 > wrote:

>

> dear friend

>

> you have two queries on rudraksha.

>

> 1. which size of rudraksha is better?

> Answer: lord shiva in shivapurana clearly says that the rudraksha

> which is of amla (emblic myrobalan) size is the best. since amla is

> big and other fuits compared in other verses are small, the bigger

> the size, the best it is. devibhagavatam also clearly mentions that

> the significance of the rudraksha lies in the clarity of the faces

> (mukh) of the rudraksha which is best only in collector size

> rudraksha because in collector rudraksha the gap between lines is

> wide and hence has best clarity whereas in small rudraksha the gap is

> too narrow that you need a magnifying glass to count the lines close

> to each other.

>

> 2. which origin of rudraksha is better?

> Answer: lord shiva mentioned that rudrksha trees are found in various

> countries (in present day geography) nepal, india, srilanka,

> indonesia etc. however, since various puranas and other scriptures

> unanimously mention that rudraksha must be round in shape, you would

> find perfect round shaped rudraksha only from nepalese origin. most

> (if not all) rudraksha grown in india are of oval in shape. there

> are perfectly 100% round shaped rudraksha from indoensia and other

> countries but they are very small in size and hence not preferred.

> only nepalese rudraksha are 100% perfect round shaped and of good

> size.

>

> for example, the two faced rudraksha produced in india, indonesia and

> other countries is completely different to the two faced rudraksha of

> nepal.

>

> similarly the rarest round ek mukh rudraksha from nepal is not found

> anywhere else. since this is expensive due to its rarity, most shiv

> bhakts have settled to some other variant of rudraksha which is flat

> and wide (crescent or halfmoon or cashewnut shaped) and has only one

> line.

>

> it is also written in the shivapurana that the rudraksha does not

> give its benefit unless it is energised. in fact it is written that

> the wearer would go to hell and stays there for fourteen lives of

> indra or one kalpam, if he wears without energisation. in the modern

> parlance, you may construe that a rudraksha without energisation is

> ineffective or of no use. hence it is suggested that you shall wear

> only a purified, sanctified, energised and programmed rudraksha.

>

> if you have a choice and have affordability, you shall always go only

> for the nepalese rudraksha of large size.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> <%40>,

> Vikrant <free_for_blue

> wrote:

> >

> > i request all rudraksh knowledgable people to advise on the

> folowing....

> > which rudraksh bead is better the himalayan bead or the nepali

> bead..?

> > here in my above statement i am speaking in terms of the

> potency,power & effects..?

> > also which rudraksh bead size is better viz-the normal size or

> the collector giant size.?

> > pls advise and guide me and help me make a decision...

> > thanks...

> >

> >

> >

> > Vikrant

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

> >

> >