VASECTOMY / TUBECTOMY

[Guest guest]

Yes definitely the comparison is just to tell that even in non sterilised persons whose germ cells are not being utilized are shed out of the body the natural way, "unfertilised". The same thing would happen if the tubes or vas deferes are ligated or cut; the germ cells would not be fertilized and reabsorbed. that's it. Please read carefully. I may be not very effective in communication.

Caldecott <todd (AT) toddcaldecott (DOT) com> wrote:

yes the gonads continue producing gametes in both tubal ligation and

vasectomy but at a reduced rate, as evidenced by the lower fertility

levels seen in reversals; and with regard to the elimination of these

products it is impossible for the ovum or the sperm to be shed in the

same manner as prior to the procedure, as in "nocturnal emission" or

through the cervix, otherwise the procedure would have been a

failure; rather, the gametes are broken down locally and reabsorbed

 

On 25-Jan-07, at 3:13 AM, ayurveda wrote:

 

> Posted by: "drdevgun " drdevgun drdevgun

>

> Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:11 pm (PST)

>

> Well Kriti,

> I will not agree with the "dystrophy" of the Testes or Ovaries, on

> not utilising the sperms or ovums. The sperms or ovum may not be

> utilised in non sterilised persons as well but that is not going to

> cause the production of sperms or ova. They will be shed out of the

> body by natural mechanisms like nocturnal emission or menstrual

> cycle. Just tying the ducts doesnt mean that the gonads would

> atrophy or dystrophy as they still are performing their function of

> producing the gametes.