Guest guest Posted December 15, 2006 Report Share Posted December 15, 2006 Dear Satish ji & respected members Some observations A Kendra Rashi from Lagna(1,4,7,10) is very very important.That is why one cannot see Mahapurusha yogas w.r to other references(say amsha lagna rashis) or even Chandra.(Kendradi bala having maximum value of one rupa,is confirming this -non consideration in vargas). For Oja/Yugma Bala(coming under sthana bala) sage considers odd/even navamshas apart from Rashi.But Kendradi bala never considers Navamsha groupings(reason -they are not lagna kendras).What we see from chandra and other references are identical to mutual position (paraspara kendras).The one from Lagna Rashi is the real KENDRA.This is also an attempt for Sunils question. On another angle-Many think they are Mahapurushas.In Reality HE alone is a Mahapurusha.Others have got YOGAS- Uniting Planets and Tattwas.This is for understanding of a tattwa in full.Degree of Tattwa understanding is good when these planets are not in tattwa sandhis and are free from external influences(planets). Kalyan Varma even says,weak Luminaries should not associate (conjunct) Mahapurusha forming planets,clarifying the importance of purity.We should also understand, that Sun/Moon do not form M.P Yogas as they are Atma/Mana ,seperate from Pancha Tattwas. These are observations and will stand corrected upon better explanations. Thanks Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.