Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 HinduThought, kalyan97 <kalyan97 wrote: Mleccha-Naga continuum paralleling Sanatana Dharma-eshadhammo sanantano continuum http://docs.google.com/View?docid=ajhwbkz2nkfv_49fgccw3 The document, Mleccha – Hindu, Bauddha, Jaina continuum has been updated based substantially on the remarkable set of epigraphical, archaeological, sculptural, numismatic evidences related to Naga contained the just published book: RK Sharma, 2006, Naaga, the tribe and the cult, Delhi, Aryan Books International). The span of naga traditions is coterminus with the span of mleccha traditions. Naga traditions are found from Takshas'ila to Kamakshya, from Kashmir to Kampuchea. Mleccha are naga. A splendid metaphor is sculpted on a panel at Sonkh (Mathura): http://docs.google.com/File?id=ajhwbkz2nkfv_491hkkj9z This sculpted panel at Sonkh (Mathura) is the metaphor of the Mleccha-Naga continuum. Elsewhere, it has been established that the makara is a combination of: crocodile, elephant (feet), and mollusc (tail) read as: mangar, ib, song; rebus: mengro 'smith', ib 'iron', sangha 'guild', that is iron-smith guild. Fish-tail is kola; rebus: kaula 'blacksmith' (Gypsy). The Naga emerging out of the jaw (cheek) of the elephant kavul.; rebus: kaula 'blacksmith'; this sangha, guild is the clearest indication that Nagavams'a is part of the mleccha, kaula mengro (blacksmith in Gypsy language) tradition which created the Sarasvati hieroglyphs and the metallurgical tradition of Sarasvati civilization. It is no coincidence that the name of the place is called Sonkh (cognate: sangha). [* kapo_la* cheek (Ya_j.Pali); kavo_la (Pkt.)[Prob. < Austro-as., poss. < Drav.]; kapola, kapula cheek, jaw (Si.); -- with metath. bogul cheek (Tor.)(CDIAL 2755). gavla, galva jaw (Pe.); kavul. jaw of elephant (Pur-ana_. 30,8); temple of elephant (Kur-al., 678 ); cheek (Ta.); kavil. cheek (Ma.); kaul.u the cheek (Tu.); kavun.d.rasa, kavud.rasa cancer of the cheek (Tu.); gauda the cheek (Te.); ku_lu cheek (Kui)(DEDR 1337)]. These updates help answer the question: why Sanskrit inscriptions (using Siddhamatrka script, a variant of Brahmi) in Hinduised states of southeast Asia? Because, Samskr.tam was systematically promoted in the regions dominated by Naga. Another question is also answered: why are two rivers named a Kaveri – one which joins Narmada at Omkares'var and the other which flows through Karnataka and Tamilnadu? Because, Naga, the hydraulic professionals of yore, worked with smiths to contribute to the evolution of bharatiya traditions, technology, ethos and civilization. Mleccha-Naga are the bedrock of Bharatiya civilization, the jeevana-dhaara of Bharatiya samskriti. We have miles to go to study the languages spoken by Mleccha-naga (and, of course, vratya/yajnika) and the Naga traditions of hinduised states of southeast asia as Hindumahasagar parivar of a maritime-riverine heritage. See also: http://sarasvati95.googlepages.com -- Dharma protects those who protect it Dharmo rakshati rakshitaha S. Kalyanaraman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.