Aurangzeb's chart....is it extraordinary? 1/12

[Guest guest]

Maybe I am biased, folks, but if Aurangzeb was one of the great kings

that ever ruled India, then Hitler must be the greatest Statesman to

have almost become a Chakravarti literally!

 

(TONGUE-IN-CHEEK -- folks! Don't start with the "BAN RR" chant!

 

Aurangzeb may have been described as an individual who practiced his

religion strictly and lived very simply, but will someone explain why

he should be called a great king to ever rule India? I mean I am not

saying that let us go all the way back to Sri Rama, but Chandragupta

Maurya's name comes to mind and King Ashoka! Even Shivaji -- who gave

Aurangzeb the run for his money! Wonder if someone has compared the

synastry between Shivaji and Aurangzeb? That is after we establish

what should be the accurate charts for these two ancient

individuals ;-)

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> SURESH

> WHICH LAGNA R U SEEING

>

> b v rAMAN HAD GIVEN IN HIS NOTABLE HOROSCOPES AS kUMBHA AND RANU

IN 2ND

> the reason he had a terrible family life

> jailed his father, killed his brothers

> and conqured, butchered many

> and did not rule TN, kerala and Rayalasema , COSTAL of AP.

>

>

> suresh1511978 <suresh1511978

wrote: Dear Pandits,

>

> The following are Emperor Aurangzeb's birth charts. Nov.3,

1618,13.59

> (5.08east)77e12 28n36.

>

> As far as my limited knowledge goes, he seems to have gajakesari,

> bhadra and neechabhanga raja yogas. all of them exceptional yogas,

I

> reckon. But sun and mars are debilitated.

>

> What are the factors that made him a great king? is it GY, which is

> supposed to give leadership qualities? He is supposed to be the

> greatest king to have ruled India, perhaps the only king to have

> conquered the whole of India. Others like maurya were restricted to

> certain regions. But Aurangzeb conquered whole India quite easily,

and

> also ruled it for many, many years, suppressing revolts and winning

> battles with relative ease.

>

> Ketu in 5 and rahu 12, was that why he was extremely religious?

>

> All this is rather exceptional, so I hope learned members can throw

> some light on what made him a great king and religious at the same

> time. Because that's a rare combination. Not all kings are

spiritual

> and not all spiritual people are wealthy.

>

> Regards,

> Suresh

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Prashantkumar G B

>

> -*- The services of this astrologer are free on

group but

> off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or phone.

> Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also

>

> Personal ID astro.prashantkumar

> 09840051861

>

>

>

>

>

> Want to start your own business? Learn how on Small Business.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Prashant,

 

His lagna is kumbha, but rahu is in 12th. This is the link

http://srath.com/lessons/advanced/badhaka.htm Based on this, he has

all the yogas I mentioned.

 

To other members, I meant to say he was great, not necessarily good.

But then, who is? It is purely subjective.

 

Regards,

Suresh

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> SURESH

> WHICH LAGNA R U SEEING

>

> b v rAMAN HAD GIVEN IN HIS NOTABLE HOROSCOPES AS kUMBHA AND RANU IN 2ND

> the reason he had a terrible family life

> jailed his father, killed his brothers

> and conqured, butchered many

> and did not rule TN, kerala and Rayalasema , COSTAL of AP.

>

>

> suresh1511978 <suresh1511978 wrote:

Dear Pandits,

>

> The following are Emperor Aurangzeb's birth charts. Nov.3, 1618,13.59

> (5.08east)77e12 28n36.

>

> As far as my limited knowledge goes, he seems to have gajakesari,

> bhadra and neechabhanga raja yogas. all of them exceptional yogas, I

> reckon. But sun and mars are debilitated.

>

> What are the factors that made him a great king? is it GY, which is

> supposed to give leadership qualities? He is supposed to be the

> greatest king to have ruled India, perhaps the only king to have

> conquered the whole of India. Others like maurya were restricted to

> certain regions. But Aurangzeb conquered whole India quite easily, and

> also ruled it for many, many years, suppressing revolts and winning

> battles with relative ease.

>

> Ketu in 5 and rahu 12, was that why he was extremely religious?

>

> All this is rather exceptional, so I hope learned members can throw

> some light on what made him a great king and religious at the same

> time. Because that's a rare combination. Not all kings are spiritual

> and not all spiritual people are wealthy.

>

> Regards,

> Suresh

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Prashantkumar G B

>

> -*- The services of this astrologer are free on

group but

> off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or phone.

> Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also

>

> Personal ID astro.prashantkumar

> 09840051861

>

>

>

>

>

> Want to start your own business? Learn how on Small Business.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Suresh ji,

 

Since you use two strong words: Great and Good

 

Please explain or at least Please Elaborate!

 

What is the difference in where you look on this from?

 

And please don't be cryptic -- take your time and post an essay if

you must or a file in the database here..

 

RR

 

, "suresh1511978"

<suresh1511978 wrote:

>

> Dear Prashant,

>

> His lagna is kumbha, but rahu is in 12th. This is the link

> http://srath.com/lessons/advanced/badhaka.htm Based on this, he has

> all the yogas I mentioned.

>

> To other members, I meant to say he was great, not necessarily good.

> But then, who is? It is purely subjective.

>

> Regards,

> Suresh

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B

> <gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> >

> > SURESH

> > WHICH LAGNA R U SEEING

> >

> > b v rAMAN HAD GIVEN IN HIS NOTABLE HOROSCOPES AS kUMBHA AND RANU

IN 2ND

> > the reason he had a terrible family life

> > jailed his father, killed his brothers

> > and conqured, butchered many

> > and did not rule TN, kerala and Rayalasema , COSTAL of AP.

> >

> >

> > suresh1511978 <suresh1511978@> wrote:

> Dear Pandits,

> >

> > The following are Emperor Aurangzeb's birth charts. Nov.3,

1618,13.59

> > (5.08east)77e12 28n36.

> >

> > As far as my limited knowledge goes, he seems to have gajakesari,

> > bhadra and neechabhanga raja yogas. all of them exceptional

yogas, I

> > reckon. But sun and mars are debilitated.

> >

> > What are the factors that made him a great king? is it GY, which

is

> > supposed to give leadership qualities? He is supposed to be the

> > greatest king to have ruled India, perhaps the only king to have

> > conquered the whole of India. Others like maurya were restricted

to

> > certain regions. But Aurangzeb conquered whole India quite

easily, and

> > also ruled it for many, many years, suppressing revolts and

winning

> > battles with relative ease.

> >

> > Ketu in 5 and rahu 12, was that why he was extremely religious?

> >

> > All this is rather exceptional, so I hope learned members can

throw

> > some light on what made him a great king and religious at the

same

> > time. Because that's a rare combination. Not all kings are

spiritual

> > and not all spiritual people are wealthy.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Suresh

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Prashantkumar G B

> >

> > -*- The services of this astrologer are free on

> group but

> > off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or

phone.

> > Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also

> >

> > Personal ID astro.prashantkumar@

> > 09840051861

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Small

Business.

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear RR,

sure the comparison of Aurangzeeb with Hitler may be a compliment to Hitler as this wretched man killed his own family members for the lust of power, butchered many millions and till date when a few Jews or Christians die media does highlight it and Hindus killed anytime in the past or now is never seen in any corner. of course only comparison can be Tutsi being massacred in Rwanda over 8M in a few days with the world watching silently, which spent billions in Kuwait liberation [as oil was there to loot]. operation desert storm I, 2 both are needles compared to what was needed in Rwanda, Ethiopia, Sudan anytime.

 

here other counties is to highlight the company AUrangzeeb can be

he must be next to Cheingis Khan alone. Hitler, Missoluni saddam, Idi Amin r smaller

 

regards

prashant

 

Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: Maybe I am biased, folks, but if Aurangzeb was one of the great kings

that ever ruled India, then Hitler must be the greatest Statesman to

have almost become a Chakravarti literally!

 

(TONGUE-IN-CHEEK -- folks! Don't start with the "BAN RR" chant!

 

Aurangzeb may have been described as an individual who practiced his

religion strictly and lived very simply, but will someone explain why

he should be called a great king to ever rule India? I mean I am not

saying that let us go all the way back to Sri Rama, but Chandragupta

Maurya's name comes to mind and King Ashoka! Even Shivaji -- who gave

Aurangzeb the run for his money! Wonder if someone has compared the

synastry between Shivaji and Aurangzeb? That is after we establish

what should be the accurate charts for these two ancient

individuals ;-)

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> SURESH

> WHICH LAGNA R U SEEING

>

> b v rAMAN HAD GIVEN IN HIS NOTABLE HOROSCOPES AS kUMBHA AND RANU

IN 2ND

> the reason he had a terrible family life

> jailed his father, killed his brothers

> and conqured, butchered many

> and did not rule TN, kerala and Rayalasema , COSTAL of AP.

>

>

> suresh1511978 <suresh1511978

wrote: Dear Pandits,

>

> The following are Emperor Aurangzeb's birth charts. Nov.3,

1618,13.59

> (5.08east)77e12 28n36.

>

> As far as my limited knowledge goes, he seems to have gajakesari,

> bhadra and neechabhanga raja yogas. all of them exceptional yogas,

I

> reckon. But sun and mars are debilitated.

>

> What are the factors that made him a great king? is it GY, which is

> supposed to give leadership qualities? He is supposed to be the

> greatest king to have ruled India, perhaps the only king to have

> conquered the whole of India. Others like maurya were restricted to

> certain regions. But Aurangzeb conquered whole India quite easily,

and

> also ruled it for many, many years, suppressing revolts and winning

> battles with relative ease.

>

> Ketu in 5 and rahu 12, was that why he was extremely religious?

>

> All this is rather exceptional, so I hope learned members can throw

> some light on what made him a great king and religious at the same

> time. Because that's a rare combination. Not all kings are

spiritual

> and not all spiritual people are wealthy.

>

> Regards,

> Suresh

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Prashantkumar G B

>

> -*- The services of this astrologer are free on

group but

> off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or phone.

> Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also

>

> Personal ID astro.prashantkumar

> 09840051861

>

>

>

>

>

> Want to start your own business? Learn how on Small Business.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear RR ji,

 

I think it's obvious. In the BG, the Lord has defined various

qualities like shama, dama as satvic. As Hindus, we may therefore

consider them 'good.' A person possessing some of these qualities is a

good man, a satvika, if you so prefer.

 

That doesn't necessarily make him great, because the world often

relates greatness to charisma, control over millions, great erudition,

wealth, talent, sound management skills, the ability to conquer and

rule over kingdoms etc. etc. Most people believe this.

 

If there's any doubt about this, please ask a mother-any mother round

the corner-if her son is great. If she nods, ask her why. I bet 100

times out of 100, she'll say her son is great because he studied at

IIT, works at Infosys, earns a lot of money, and so forth. Not one

mother is gonna say, "My son is great because he has all the satvic

qualities." Even if he does have all the satvic qualities!!

 

Why do you think that is? It's because most people do NOT relate

greatness to goodness. That's why great men are not necessarily good

men, and vice versa. Greatness often revolves around worldly

accomplishments, whereas goodness centers on cultivating satvic

qualities. The two are not related in any way, which is why I believe

what I believe.

 

Hope I've answered your question.

 

Regards,

Suresh

 

 

 

, "Rohiniranjan"

<jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> Dear Suresh ji,

>

> Since you use two strong words: Great and Good

>

> Please explain or at least Please Elaborate!

>

> What is the difference in where you look on this from?

>

> And please don't be cryptic -- take your time and post an essay if

> you must or a file in the database here..

>

> RR

>

> , "suresh1511978"

> <suresh1511978@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Prashant,

> >

> > His lagna is kumbha, but rahu is in 12th. This is the link

> > http://srath.com/lessons/advanced/badhaka.htm Based on this, he has

> > all the yogas I mentioned.

> >

> > To other members, I meant to say he was great, not necessarily good.

> > But then, who is? It is purely subjective.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Suresh

> >

> > , Prashant Kumar G B

> > <gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > >

> > > SURESH

> > > WHICH LAGNA R U SEEING

> > >

> > > b v rAMAN HAD GIVEN IN HIS NOTABLE HOROSCOPES AS kUMBHA AND RANU

> IN 2ND

> > > the reason he had a terrible family life

> > > jailed his father, killed his brothers

> > > and conqured, butchered many

> > > and did not rule TN, kerala and Rayalasema , COSTAL of AP.

> > >

> > >

> > > suresh1511978 <suresh1511978@> wrote:

> > Dear Pandits,

> > >

> > > The following are Emperor Aurangzeb's birth charts. Nov.3,

> 1618,13.59

> > > (5.08east)77e12 28n36.

> > >

> > > As far as my limited knowledge goes, he seems to have gajakesari,

> > > bhadra and neechabhanga raja yogas. all of them exceptional

> yogas, I

> > > reckon. But sun and mars are debilitated.

> > >

> > > What are the factors that made him a great king? is it GY, which

> is

> > > supposed to give leadership qualities? He is supposed to be the

> > > greatest king to have ruled India, perhaps the only king to have

> > > conquered the whole of India. Others like maurya were restricted

> to

> > > certain regions. But Aurangzeb conquered whole India quite

> easily, and

> > > also ruled it for many, many years, suppressing revolts and

> winning

> > > battles with relative ease.

> > >

> > > Ketu in 5 and rahu 12, was that why he was extremely religious?

> > >

> > > All this is rather exceptional, so I hope learned members can

> throw

> > > some light on what made him a great king and religious at the

> same

> > > time. Because that's a rare combination. Not all kings are

> spiritual

> > > and not all spiritual people are wealthy.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Suresh

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Prashantkumar G B

> > >

> > > -*- The services of this astrologer are free on

> > group but

> > > off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or

> phone.

> > > Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also

> > >

> > > Personal ID astro.prashantkumar@

> > > 09840051861

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Small

> Business.

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

Good answer. Thanks for sharing.

 

RR

 

, "suresh1511978"

<suresh1511978 wrote:

>

> Dear RR ji,

>

> I think it's obvious. In the BG, the Lord has defined various

> qualities like shama, dama as satvic. As Hindus, we may therefore

> consider them 'good.' A person possessing some of these qualities

is a

> good man, a satvika, if you so prefer.

>

> That doesn't necessarily make him great, because the world often

> relates greatness to charisma, control over millions, great

erudition,

> wealth, talent, sound management skills, the ability to conquer and

> rule over kingdoms etc. etc. Most people believe this.

>

> If there's any doubt about this, please ask a mother-any mother

round

> the corner-if her son is great. If she nods, ask her why. I bet 100

> times out of 100, she'll say her son is great because he studied at

> IIT, works at Infosys, earns a lot of money, and so forth. Not one

> mother is gonna say, "My son is great because he has all the satvic

> qualities." Even if he does have all the satvic qualities!!

>

> Why do you think that is? It's because most people do NOT relate

> greatness to goodness. That's why great men are not necessarily good

> men, and vice versa. Greatness often revolves around worldly

> accomplishments, whereas goodness centers on cultivating satvic

> qualities. The two are not related in any way, which is why I

believe

> what I believe.

>

> Hope I've answered your question.

>

> Regards,

> Suresh

>

>

>

> , "Rohiniranjan"

> <jyotish_vani@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Suresh ji,

> >

> > Since you use two strong words: Great and Good

> >

> > Please explain or at least Please Elaborate!

> >

> > What is the difference in where you look on this from?

> >

> > And please don't be cryptic -- take your time and post an essay

if

> > you must or a file in the database here..

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , "suresh1511978"

> > <suresh1511978@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Prashant,

> > >

> > > His lagna is kumbha, but rahu is in 12th. This is the link

> > > http://srath.com/lessons/advanced/badhaka.htm Based on this, he

has

> > > all the yogas I mentioned.

> > >

> > > To other members, I meant to say he was great, not necessarily

good.

> > > But then, who is? It is purely subjective.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Suresh

> > >

> > > , Prashant Kumar G B

> > > <gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > SURESH

> > > > WHICH LAGNA R U SEEING

> > > >

> > > > b v rAMAN HAD GIVEN IN HIS NOTABLE HOROSCOPES AS kUMBHA AND

RANU

> > IN 2ND

> > > > the reason he had a terrible family life

> > > > jailed his father, killed his brothers

> > > > and conqured, butchered many

> > > > and did not rule TN, kerala and Rayalasema , COSTAL of AP.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > suresh1511978 <suresh1511978@>

wrote:

> > > Dear Pandits,

> > > >

> > > > The following are Emperor Aurangzeb's birth charts. Nov.3,

> > 1618,13.59

> > > > (5.08east)77e12 28n36.

> > > >

> > > > As far as my limited knowledge goes, he seems to have

gajakesari,

> > > > bhadra and neechabhanga raja yogas. all of them exceptional

> > yogas, I

> > > > reckon. But sun and mars are debilitated.

> > > >

> > > > What are the factors that made him a great king? is it GY,

which

> > is

> > > > supposed to give leadership qualities? He is supposed to be

the

> > > > greatest king to have ruled India, perhaps the only king to

have

> > > > conquered the whole of India. Others like maurya were

restricted

> > to

> > > > certain regions. But Aurangzeb conquered whole India quite

> > easily, and

> > > > also ruled it for many, many years, suppressing revolts and

> > winning

> > > > battles with relative ease.

> > > >

> > > > Ketu in 5 and rahu 12, was that why he was extremely

religious?

> > > >

> > > > All this is rather exceptional, so I hope learned members

can

> > throw

> > > > some light on what made him a great king and religious at

the

> > same

> > > > time. Because that's a rare combination. Not all kings are

> > spiritual

> > > > and not all spiritual people are wealthy.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Suresh

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Prashantkumar G B

> > > >

> > > > -*- The services of this astrologer are free on

 

> > > group but

> > > > off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or

> > phone.

> > > > Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID

also

> > > >

> > > > Personal ID astro.prashantkumar@

> > > > 09840051861

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Small

> > Business.

> > > >

> > > >