Guest guest Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 Dear Chandrashekhar ji Kindly give examples of the aspects and Yogas mentioned as we could understand them better. My concern is are they pointing to navamshas of planets combined with aspects in Rashi chakra?.Kindly clarify.Also pls give one example of the other D-Chart combination. Respect Pradeep , Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > Dear Satish, > > No, divisional charts are not myth as they are mentioned in all the > classics. the difference of opinion is in the way they are to be > interpreted and the extent to which they can influence the final results > for a jataka. One group thinks that D-chart override what is promised by > rasi chart whereas other group, including me, thinks that unless rasi > chart promises something merely something in D- Chart can not deliver to > the Jataka. Both the groups have their points and one should find out > for oneself. > > My opinion is that navamsha being the chart from which strength is drawn > by the planets is very relevant for interpretation of a chart. The > classics tell that planets in exaltation in navamsha overrule the > weakness of the same planets in debility in rasi charts. Again at some > places specific aspects in navamsha are indicated by sages and they > could be accepted as such. There are some other d-charts where classics > give specific combinations and those could be accepted as given. But > this may not be true for all other divisional charts as the sages have > told how to look at strength of planets in D- charts and any new > approach may, while being innovative, not be capable of being applied to > a different set of parameters. > > Personally I prefer to look at D-Charts as amplification of individual > bhavas and use them only when I want to look at some hidden flavour of a > bhava. Generally correct interpretation of navamsha and rasi should > suffice for prediction. > > Aspects in Vedic astrology being considered from rasi to rasi, looking > at aspects in D- Charts may not stand the test of logic, is my view. > > Of course those more knowledgeable than me, may hold a different view on > the matter. > > SPK wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Is divisional charts is a myth, that has now been > > institutinalized ? I would like Chandrashekharjis > > views on this. If I recall, he has said that there is > > a case to be made for using navansha as a separate > > chart( Chandrashekharji, please correct me if I am > > misquoting you), but not for the others. > > > > I am puzzled by people using these charts. Lets say > > for argument sake that they are real charts. How can > > one be so sure of the division chart lagna when many > > natal birth times are aprroximated. To base your > > conclusions on these is quite dangerous. > > > > Anyway by two cents > > > > Satish > > --- D Ramapriya <ramapriya.d > > <ramapriya.d%40gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > On 11/22/06, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish > > <bhaskar_jyotish%40.co.in>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Budh and Mercury can never be in Mutual sevenths > > > as the maximum > > > > distance between them can be only 28 degrees if I > > > remember > > > > my lessons right. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > I suspect the 'mutual sevenths' is the brainwave of > > > someone (and I know of > > > some astrologers who do!) who looks at yogas in > > > divisional charts as well > > > > > > Ramapriya > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > Sponsored Link > > > > Degrees online in as fast as 1 Yr > > MBA, Bachelor's, Master's, Assoc > > http://.degrees.info <http://.degrees.info> > > > > > > -------------------------------- ------- > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.12/545 - Release 11/21/2006 10:36 PM > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Dear Pradeep, There are many examples but the classic talks about Mutual aspect of Saturn and Venus in Trimshamsha chart which indicates a lady with lesbian tendencies in Stree jataka. You already know about the navamsha exaltation and debility status and the bhavas n navamsha being considered similar to the Rasi chart. Take Care, Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > Kindly give examples of the aspects and Yogas mentioned as we could > understand them better. > My concern is are they pointing to navamshas of planets combined > with aspects in Rashi chakra?.Kindly clarify.Also pls give one > example of the other D-Chart combination. > > Respect > Pradeep > > <%40>, Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > > > Dear Satish, > > > > No, divisional charts are not myth as they are mentioned in all > the > > classics. the difference of opinion is in the way they are to be > > interpreted and the extent to which they can influence the final > results > > for a jataka. One group thinks that D-chart override what is > promised by > > rasi chart whereas other group, including me, thinks that unless > rasi > > chart promises something merely something in D- Chart can not > deliver to > > the Jataka. Both the groups have their points and one should find > out > > for oneself. > > > > My opinion is that navamsha being the chart from which strength is > drawn > > by the planets is very relevant for interpretation of a chart. The > > classics tell that planets in exaltation in navamsha overrule the > > weakness of the same planets in debility in rasi charts. Again at > some > > places specific aspects in navamsha are indicated by sages and > they > > could be accepted as such. There are some other d-charts where > classics > > give specific combinations and those could be accepted as given. > But > > this may not be true for all other divisional charts as the sages > have > > told how to look at strength of planets in D- charts and any new > > approach may, while being innovative, not be capable of being > applied to > > a different set of parameters. > > > > Personally I prefer to look at D-Charts as amplification of > individual > > bhavas and use them only when I want to look at some hidden > flavour of a > > bhava. Generally correct interpretation of navamsha and rasi > should > > suffice for prediction. > > > > Aspects in Vedic astrology being considered from rasi to rasi, > looking > > at aspects in D- Charts may not stand the test of logic, is my > view. > > > > Of course those more knowledgeable than me, may hold a different > view on > > the matter. > > > > SPK wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Is divisional charts is a myth, that has now been > > > institutinalized ? I would like Chandrashekharjis > > > views on this. If I recall, he has said that there is > > > a case to be made for using navansha as a separate > > > chart( Chandrashekharji, please correct me if I am > > > misquoting you), but not for the others. > > > > > > I am puzzled by people using these charts. Lets say > > > for argument sake that they are real charts. How can > > > one be so sure of the division chart lagna when many > > > natal birth times are aprroximated. To base your > > > conclusions on these is quite dangerous. > > > > > > Anyway by two cents > > > > > > Satish > > > --- D Ramapriya <ramapriya.d > > > <ramapriya.d%40gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > On 11/22/06, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish > > > <bhaskar_jyotish%40.co.in>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Budh and Mercury can never be in Mutual sevenths > > > > as the maximum > > > > > distance between them can be only 28 degrees if I > > > > remember > > > > > my lessons right. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suspect the 'mutual sevenths' is the brainwave of > > > > someone (and I know of > > > > some astrologers who do!) who looks at yogas in > > > > divisional charts as well > > > > > > > > Ramapriya > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > > Sponsored Link > > > > > > Degrees online in as fast as 1 Yr > > > MBA, Bachelor's, Master's, Assoc > > > http://.degrees.info <http://.degrees.info> > <http://.degrees.info <http://.degrees.info>> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > ------- > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.12/545 - Release Date: > 11/21/2006 10:36 PM > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.