Dadu (Maternal Grandfather; personal -- zero astrological)

[Guest guest]

He was ancient when I met him for the first time. He had been

described in rather magnified terms by my mother all past 19 years or

so and some of the stories bordered around the occult and ouija

seances and romanchack <=hair raising goose bumping>...

 

I had such a incredible image of him built up with my boyish

imagination and so on.

 

When he actually came into my life, just when I was really dabbling

and learning about REAL science, anatomy and physiology and physics

and feeling so bloody powerful and wise -- this frail old man walked

into my life. Just as MA (she is no more, nor is HE) described, he

took so long to finish his meal -- he chewed and chewed until the

food liquified (moderns -- please note the contrast from what you

do!).

 

He spent hours diagnosing the homeopathic malady that I never believe

I ever had! But then he really stumped me (psst, I think I never let

him on as to how I felt -- sharing it now!) when he listened to my

novice anatomy prattle with that boyish smile of curiosity on his

face and said,"I do not understand anything you described <beta> but

I can sense that it is IMPORTANT -- and I am excited by just hearing

about it!

 

He was an acclaimed teacher that changed many lives! I have met some

that had been influenced by his presence and grew up to become deans

of Engineering Colleges and Institutes. He only remained a headmaster

of a school before he was ousted of his homeland.

 

And all I got in my lifetime were those few days with him that I lost

in my arrogant questioning of homeopathy that did not make sense

then ...! Yes I miss him today -- but only because he showered love

upon me and infected me with his curiosity.

 

Pronaam DADU...

 

 

 

 

 

 

, "Rohiniranjan"

<jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> She/He/IT was attacking his/her image of this Rohini person, Rishi!

>

> Now you have really confused him/her/it!

>

> :-)

>

> But only through confusion and questions do we decide to pursue

> further!

>

> My first question in life was:

>

> Bhool chook leni deni!

>

> Why did my parents ask for forgiveness before they even commited

the

> MISTAKE?

>

> ANYONE WILLING AND ABLE TO EXPLAIN THAT -- WILLING TO STEP FORWARD

ON

> JYOTISH_REMEDIES FORUM AND ENLIGHTEN AND EDUCATE ME AND OTHERS?

>

> With some examples? <psst! astrological?? the jyotish kind???>

>

> If I am being too 'funny' -- know this folks!

>

> The least I ever understood intellectually in my life was from my

one

> and only encounter with my dadu (maternal grandfather) once in my

> life after he was ousted from his lifetime in East Bengal and then

> East Pakistan before it became -- Bangaladesh!

>

> Pronaaams Dadu -- I finally get it (!) really all of it -- now! As

> YOU can SEE!!

>

> Thanks for being there in all five thousands of your fragments!

Maybe

> more?

>

> RR

>

>

>

> , "rishi_2000in<rishi_2000in@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Sheenu,

> > Shri Rohini Ranjan has been in Jyotish for forty years. He had

been

> > writing in the Astrological Magazine even perhaps before you were

> > born. You can read his articles all over the internet too.

> > I would suggest that you apologise for your outburst.

> > The Rahu/ Ketu drishti issue is one of the several issues over

> which

> > Jyotish has reached no consensus over several decades. It is a

> > discussion on a different plane of Jyotish. The classical texts

> > rarely support Rahu drishti.

> > Read more and then talk on such issues.

> > Rishi

> >

> >

> > , "sheenutiwari"

> > <sheenutiwari@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Rohini,

> > >

> > >

> > > You do not consider Rahu and Ketu capable of causing Dhristi ?

> > > Are you astrologer or what ?

> > > What are you doing on this forum ?

> > > What is your existence as newcomer learner in this Forum of

> > astrology

> > > or expert ?

> > > Why dont you read some basic books on astrology before making

> such

> > > comments.

> > > Sheenu .

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , "Rohiniranjan"

> > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Sridhar ji,

> > > >

> > > > No question is ever silly, though many answers often are, or

at

> > > least

> > > > can be! <not on this august forum, of course - ever ever!>

> > > >

> > > > Since no planet really is moving backwards but merely

observed

> by

> > > our

> > > > earth-based orientation to appear to be moving backwards --

> > planets

> > > > only go forwards, and therefore their drishti, their glance,

> > their

> > > > vision is always forward, counted counterclockwise in a north

> > > indian

> > > > diamond horoscope chart. In the south indian chart, which you

> > were

> > > > presumably referring to, the drishti would be counted

clockwise

> > > since

> > > > the signs are placed in that order, as if someone is viewing

> the

> > > sky

> > > > from south of the ecliptic (hence the order is cw).

> > > >

> > > > Rahu and ketu are mathematical points, which in their true

> motion

> > > can

> > > > move forwards and backwards, although their mean motion is

> always

> > > > backwards. I do not consider them capable of casting drishti

so

> > > would

> > > > not comment on it.

> > > >

> > > > Some individuals report a special influence for retrograde

> > planets

> > > in

> > > > the 12th from where they are located. This is not drishti and

> > this

> > > > does not mean that the retrograde planet shifts back one

house.

> > > This

> > > > is described in one of the nadis. Not everyone accepts that

to

> be

> > > the

> > > > case.

> > > >

> > > > Written just as a forum member since I am not a gurujan.

> > > >

> > > > RR

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , "ashwin_062k"

> > > > <ashwin_062k@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Gurujans

> > > > >

> > > > > I would appreciate if you could clarify my doubt on the

> > following:

> > > > >

> > > > > When we determine the aspects of planets in a direct motion

> we

> > > > count

> > > > > the houses in a clockwise direction (except for rahu and

ketu

> > who

> > > > > moves in retrograde motion always). Correct me if I am

> wrong.

> > > > >

> > > > > If we have a planet which is retrograde in the birth chart,

> do

> > we

> > > > > still calculate the Aspects for that planet in a clockwise

> > > > direction?

> > > > > or we have to consider the direction of the planet's motion.

> > > > >

> > > > > Please pardon me, if this is a silly question.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Sridhar

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sheenu,

It is you who needs her credentials checked in astrology.You who needs to read. If you have not come across ranjanji's writings you badly need to spend time reading. At the very onset may i put forth a poser- before embarking in this line learn humility. This brashness will not get u far in life. Before looking at drishtis of planets have a vision yourself.

Vatsala

Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

He was ancient when I met him for the first time. He had been

described in rather magnified terms by my mother all past 19 years or

so and some of the stories bordered around the occult and ouija

seances and romanchack <=hair raising goose bumping>...

 

I had such a incredible image of him built up with my boyish

imagination and so on.

 

When he actually came into my life, just when I was really dabbling

and learning about REAL science, anatomy and physiology and physics

and feeling so bloody powerful and wise -- this frail old man walked

into my life. Just as MA (she is no more, nor is HE) described, he

took so long to finish his meal -- he chewed and chewed until the

food liquified (moderns -- please note the contrast from what you

do!).

 

He spent hours diagnosing the homeopathic malady that I never believe

I ever had! But then he really stumped me (psst, I think I never let

him on as to how I felt -- sharing it now!) when he listened to my

novice anatomy prattle with that boyish smile of curiosity on his

face and said,"I do not understand anything you described <beta> but

I can sense that it is IMPORTANT -- and I am excited by just hearing

about it!

 

He was an acclaimed teacher that changed many lives! I have met some

that had been influenced by his presence and grew up to become deans

of Engineering Colleges and Institutes. He only remained a headmaster

of a school before he was ousted of his homeland.

 

And all I got in my lifetime were those few days with him that I lost

in my arrogant questioning of homeopathy that did not make sense

then ...! Yes I miss him today -- but only because he showered love

upon me and infected me with his curiosity.

 

Pronaam DADU...

 

, "Rohiniranjan"

<jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> She/He/IT was attacking his/her image of this Rohini person, Rishi!

>

> Now you have really confused him/her/it!

>

> :-)

>

> But only through confusion and questions do we decide to pursue

> further!

>

> My first question in life was:

>

> Bhool chook leni deni!

>

> Why did my parents ask for forgiveness before they even commited

the

> MISTAKE?

>

> ANYONE WILLING AND ABLE TO EXPLAIN THAT -- WILLING TO STEP FORWARD

ON

> JYOTISH_REMEDIES FORUM AND ENLIGHTEN AND EDUCATE ME AND OTHERS?

>

> With some examples? <psst! astrological?? the jyotish kind???>

>

> If I am being too 'funny' -- know this folks!

>

> The least I ever understood intellectually in my life was from my

one

> and only encounter with my dadu (maternal grandfather) once in my

> life after he was ousted from his lifetime in East Bengal and then

> East Pakistan before it became -- Bangaladesh!

>

> Pronaaams Dadu -- I finally get it (!) really all of it -- now! As

> YOU can SEE!!

>

> Thanks for being there in all five thousands of your fragments!

Maybe

> more?

>

> RR

>

>

>

> , "rishi_2000in<rishi_2000in@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Sheenu,

> > Shri Rohini Ranjan has been in Jyotish for forty years. He had

been

> > writing in the Astrological Magazine even perhaps before you were

> > born. You can read his articles all over the internet too.

> > I would suggest that you apologise for your outburst.

> > The Rahu/ Ketu drishti issue is one of the several issues over

> which

> > Jyotish has reached no consensus over several decades. It is a

> > discussion on a different plane of Jyotish. The classical texts

> > rarely support Rahu drishti.

> > Read more and then talk on such issues.

> > Rishi

> >

> >

> > , "sheenutiwari"

> > <sheenutiwari@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Rohini,

> > >

> > >

> > > You do not consider Rahu and Ketu capable of causing Dhristi ?

> > > Are you astrologer or what ?

> > > What are you doing on this forum ?

> > > What is your existence as newcomer learner in this Forum of

> > astrology

> > > or expert ?

> > > Why dont you read some basic books on astrology before making

> such

> > > comments.

> > > Sheenu .

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , "Rohiniranjan"

> > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Sridhar ji,

> > > >

> > > > No question is ever silly, though many answers often are, or

at

> > > least

> > > > can be! <not on this august forum, of course - ever ever!>

> > > >

> > > > Since no planet really is moving backwards but merely

observed

> by

> > > our

> > > > earth-based orientation to appear to be moving backwards --

> > planets

> > > > only go forwards, and therefore their drishti, their glance,

> > their

> > > > vision is always forward, counted counterclockwise in a north

> > > indian

> > > > diamond horoscope chart. In the south indian chart, which you

> > were

> > > > presumably referring to, the drishti would be counted

clockwise

> > > since

> > > > the signs are placed in that order, as if someone is viewing

> the

> > > sky

> > > > from south of the ecliptic (hence the order is cw).

> > > >

> > > > Rahu and ketu are mathematical points, which in their true

> motion

> > > can

> > > > move forwards and backwards, although their mean motion is

> always

> > > > backwards. I do not consider them capable of casting drishti

so

> > > would

> > > > not comment on it.

> > > >

> > > > Some individuals report a special influence for retrograde

> > planets

> > > in

> > > > the 12th from where they are located. This is not drishti and

> > this

> > > > does not mean that the retrograde planet shifts back one

house.

> > > This

> > > > is described in one of the nadis. Not everyone accepts that

to

> be

> > > the

> > > > case.

> > > >

> > > > Written just as a forum member since I am not a gurujan.

> > > >

> > > > RR

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , "ashwin_062k"

> > > > <ashwin_062k@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Gurujans

> > > > >

> > > > > I would appreciate if you could clarify my doubt on the

> > following:

> > > > >

> > > > > When we determine the aspects of planets in a direct motion

> we

> > > > count

> > > > > the houses in a clockwise direction (except for rahu and

ketu

> > who

> > > > > moves in retrograde motion always). Correct me if I am

> wrong.

> > > > >

> > > > > If we have a planet which is retrograde in the birth chart,

> do

> > we

> > > > > still calculate the Aspects for that planet in a clockwise

> > > > direction?

> > > > > or we have to consider the direction of the planet's motion.

> > > > >

> > > > > Please pardon me, if this is a silly question.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Sridhar

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India

Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW