Guest guest Posted November 10, 2006 Report Share Posted November 10, 2006 Dear Sunil, There are number of ways to judge a planet's ability to give its results during its periods. But Manteraswara in his Phala Deepika clearly says the following order: 1. Lordship results 2. Placement results 3. Natural signification results. Now Moon is your MD Period. When one enjoys the Moon dasha, generally, the first year and the last year may not give good results. This again the instruction of Manteraswara. According to Parashara, the MOON and the SUN do not bear the blemish of being 8th Lord. Here the Moon is 8th Lord. A general dasa rule is that "No planet does good in its own AD Period". In Moon MD the first AD is of Moon only. Now corelate everything. But again, any instruction, should be applied judiciously. You have to see the lordship, placement and finally how the AD Lord is placed from Moon. Hope this helps to some extent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2006 Report Share Posted November 10, 2006 Dear RavindraMani, //A general dasa rule is that "No planet does good in its own AD Period". In Moon MD the first AD is of Moon only. Now corelate everything.// I honestly did not know about this. But then for Major Dasha Lords like Jupiter,Saturn,Rahu,Venus, Mercury, where their own Ads would have a longer period, this may/may not hold good. Rahu-Rahu - app. 2 Years 8 months Jup -Jup - app. 2 Years 1 month. Sat -Sat - app. 3 Years 3 months Mer -Mer - app. 2 Years 5 months Ven -Ven - app. 3 Years 4 months Cause though we have seen displacements in Rahu-Rahu and Sat-Sat in those same antars we have also seen the beginning of a new glorious epoch in life of native at times. So the answer has to be lying somewhere. One of my Teachers when put this question, that how to judge such Own Dasha antars where period is long , I was replied that You should treat the pratyantar as antars and judge accordingly, because naturally the same effects would not remain in the total Antar Dasha, so that would be the logical explanation. It would be appreciated if You would throw some light on above issue.The other learned members may also give their comments on how to judge such Antars. regards, Bhaskar. jyotish-vidya, "ravindramani" <ravindramani wrote: > > Dear Sunil, > > There are number of ways to judge a planet's ability to give its > results during its periods. > > But Manteraswara in his Phala Deepika clearly says the following > order: > > 1. Lordship results > 2. Placement results > 3. Natural signification results. > > Now Moon is your MD Period. When one enjoys the Moon dasha, > generally, the first year and the last year may not give good > results. This again the instruction of Manteraswara. > > According to Parashara, the MOON and the SUN do not bear the blemish > of being 8th Lord. Here the Moon is 8th Lord. > > A general dasa rule is that "No planet does good in its own AD > Period". In Moon MD the first AD is of Moon only. Now corelate > everything. > > But again, any instruction, should be applied judiciously. You have > to see the lordship, placement and finally how the AD Lord is placed > from Moon. > > Hope this helps to some extent. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2006 Report Share Posted November 10, 2006 Dear Mr. Bhaskar, I already said in my messge it is a general rule. And further said whatever rule beging taught to us is to be applied judiciously. When the last AD of any Major period or the first AD of any Major period are known as "Chitra Dashas". They are generally not favourable. Repeat "generally" not favourable. It is just like a junction or Sandhi (The way we treat the Nakshtra Sandhi or the Rasi Sandhi). One dasha ends and the other dasha starts. Hence it is treated like that. Every planet tends to give its promised results (Positive results) in its favourble AD periods. Further any particular result of a planet, which a person treats that it is favourable for him may be unfavourable for somebody else. Displacement from India to US is treated favourable nowadays by many. Previously it was not so. Nobody wants to go from his birth place. I agree no AD period is going to be full of troubles and no AD period is full of happiness. The point which I wrote was for a specific chart and on a specific question which was sent to me in my personal mail box. Mantreshwara's injunction was also for a particular planet i.e. for Moon and not for all planets. I replied that inadvertantly in the forum. Sorry for the inconvenience caused to the Members of the List. I again emphasise every chart is unique and the dasha results of the planets concerned are to be judged accordinly whether the AD is shorter one or a longer one, and the results are to be pronounced to the person concerned taking consideration of his background and his priorities. Regards, C.S. Ravindramani. ===================================================================== jyotish-vidya, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear RavindraMani, > > //A general dasa rule is that "No planet does good in its own AD > Period". In Moon MD the first AD is of Moon only. Now corelate > everything.// > > I honestly did not know about this. > But then for Major Dasha Lords like Jupiter,Saturn,Rahu,Venus, > Mercury, where their own Ads would have a longer period, this > may/may not hold good. > Rahu-Rahu - app. 2 Years 8 months > Jup -Jup - app. 2 Years 1 month. > Sat -Sat - app. 3 Years 3 months > Mer -Mer - app. 2 Years 5 months > Ven -Ven - app. 3 Years 4 months > Cause though we have seen displacements in Rahu-Rahu and > Sat-Sat in those same antars we have also seen the beginning > of a new glorious epoch in life of native at times. > So the answer has to be lying somewhere. > > One of my Teachers when put this question, > that how to judge such Own Dasha antars where period is long , > I was replied that You should treat the pratyantar as antars > and judge accordingly, because naturally the same effects would > not remain in the total Antar Dasha, so that would be the > logical explanation. > > It would be appreciated if You would throw some light on > above issue.The other learned members may also give their > comments on how to judge such Antars. > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > > jyotish-vidya, "ravindramani" > <ravindramani@> wrote: > > > > Dear Sunil, > > > > There are number of ways to judge a planet's ability to give its > > results during its periods. > > > > But Manteraswara in his Phala Deepika clearly says the following > > order: > > > > 1. Lordship results > > 2. Placement results > > 3. Natural signification results. > > > > Now Moon is your MD Period. When one enjoys the Moon dasha, > > generally, the first year and the last year may not give good > > results. This again the instruction of Manteraswara. > > > > According to Parashara, the MOON and the SUN do not bear the > blemish > > of being 8th Lord. Here the Moon is 8th Lord. > > > > A general dasa rule is that "No planet does good in its own AD > > Period". In Moon MD the first AD is of Moon only. Now corelate > > everything. > > > > But again, any instruction, should be applied judiciously. You > have > > to see the lordship, placement and finally how the AD Lord is > placed > > from Moon. > > > > Hope this helps to some extent. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2006 Report Share Posted November 10, 2006 Thank You Sir for re-confirming. regards, Bhaskar. jyotish-vidya, "ravindramani" <ravindramani wrote: > > Dear Mr. Bhaskar, > > I already said in my messge it is a general rule. And further said > whatever rule beging taught to us is to be applied judiciously. > > When the last AD of any Major period or the first AD of any Major > period are known as "Chitra Dashas". They are generally not > favourable. Repeat "generally" not favourable. It is just like a > junction or Sandhi (The way we treat the Nakshtra Sandhi or the Rasi > Sandhi). One dasha ends and the other dasha starts. Hence it is > treated like that. Every planet tends to give its promised results > (Positive results) in its favourble AD periods. Further any > particular result of a planet, which a person treats that it is > favourable for him may be unfavourable for somebody else. > Displacement from India to US is treated favourable nowadays by > many. Previously it was not so. Nobody wants to go from his birth > place. > > I agree no AD period is going to be full of troubles and no AD period > is full of happiness. > > The point which I wrote was for a specific chart and on a specific > question which was sent to me in my personal mail box. > Mantreshwara's injunction was also for a particular planet i.e. for > Moon and not for all planets. I replied that inadvertantly in the > forum. Sorry for the inconvenience caused to the Members of the > List. > > I again emphasise every chart is unique and the dasha results of the > planets concerned are to be judged accordinly whether the AD is > shorter one or a longer one, and the results are to be pronounced to > the person concerned taking consideration of his background and his > priorities. > > Regards, C.S. Ravindramani. > > ===================================================================== > > > > jyotish-vidya, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@> > wrote: > > > > Dear RavindraMani, > > > > //A general dasa rule is that "No planet does good in its own AD > > Period". In Moon MD the first AD is of Moon only. Now corelate > > everything.// > > > > I honestly did not know about this. > > But then for Major Dasha Lords like Jupiter,Saturn,Rahu,Venus, > > Mercury, where their own Ads would have a longer period, this > > may/may not hold good. > > Rahu-Rahu - app. 2 Years 8 months > > Jup -Jup - app. 2 Years 1 month. > > Sat -Sat - app. 3 Years 3 months > > Mer -Mer - app. 2 Years 5 months > > Ven -Ven - app. 3 Years 4 months > > Cause though we have seen displacements in Rahu-Rahu and > > Sat-Sat in those same antars we have also seen the beginning > > of a new glorious epoch in life of native at times. > > So the answer has to be lying somewhere. > > > > One of my Teachers when put this question, > > that how to judge such Own Dasha antars where period is long , > > I was replied that You should treat the pratyantar as antars > > and judge accordingly, because naturally the same effects would > > not remain in the total Antar Dasha, so that would be the > > logical explanation. > > > > It would be appreciated if You would throw some light on > > above issue.The other learned members may also give their > > comments on how to judge such Antars. > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, "ravindramani" > > <ravindramani@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sunil, > > > > > > There are number of ways to judge a planet's ability to give its > > > results during its periods. > > > > > > But Manteraswara in his Phala Deepika clearly says the following > > > order: > > > > > > 1. Lordship results > > > 2. Placement results > > > 3. Natural signification results. > > > > > > Now Moon is your MD Period. When one enjoys the Moon dasha, > > > generally, the first year and the last year may not give good > > > results. This again the instruction of Manteraswara. > > > > > > According to Parashara, the MOON and the SUN do not bear the > > blemish > > > of being 8th Lord. Here the Moon is 8th Lord. > > > > > > A general dasa rule is that "No planet does good in its own AD > > > Period". In Moon MD the first AD is of Moon only. Now corelate > > > everything. > > > > > > But again, any instruction, should be applied judiciously. You > > have > > > to see the lordship, placement and finally how the AD Lord is > > placed > > > from Moon. > > > > > > Hope this helps to some extent. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.