Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 I¹m at a point in working on JS3 where I need to decide: Does GJ or JS3 use too small of type? I use a lot of Accujen (Geneva) 9 point in my program. Is it too small? I¹m looking for gut level response. I want the program to be ³easy on the eyes² I have personally reached the age where I were magnifiers at times. I am finding my own program too hard to read at normal monitor resolutions. I am looking for input from the prols, the masses, the throngs. (Kidding) If I get a bunch of good responses, it will really help me in my work right now. Responses can (and actually hopefully will be) short. Looking for gut level, eye level, responses. Richard (Das Goravani) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 das - my old eyes and old gut saying that 9 point is ok... but if you can program in an option then everybody (old and young) would be happy..... glad that you are doing some fine tuning ))) love and blessings, sabine valist, Richard E Wurst <> wrote: > > > > I¹m at a point in working on JS3 where I need to decide: > > Does GJ or JS3 use too small of type? > > I use a lot of Accujen (Geneva) 9 point in my program. > > Is it too small? > > I¹m looking for gut level response. > > I want the program to be ³easy on the eyes² > > I have personally reached the age where I were magnifiers at times. > > I am finding my own program too hard to read at normal monitor resolutions. > > I am looking for input from the prols, the masses, the throngs. (Kidding) > > If I get a bunch of good responses, it will really help me in my work right > now. > > Responses can (and actually hopefully will be) short. Looking for gut > level, eye level, responses. > > > Richard > (Das Goravani) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Hi Richard (Dasji) I think the fonts are fine just the way they are in GJ. Please DON'T make them any smaller. I have the same problem of reading from the screen as you do. Most of your users are likely to be people in the 30+ age group who would be experiencing the same problem as you and I face in the next few years so there is a good reason or not making it any smaller. If you can include the capability to customize and make the fonts larger without giving up aesthetics and functionality please do so! The key areas where font size may be a real issue is when you have lots of text such as planetary readings, etc. Even there what you have is adequate. Hope that helps! Regards Prakash Desai eSimplify, Inc. IT and Workflow Solutions www.simplifymt.com prakash (AT) simplifymt (DOT) com (818) 842-7470 Mobile: (818) 216-3459 valist [valist] On Behalf Of Richard E Wurst Monday, November 06, 2006 8:41 AM JS3; valist Please Respond I¹m at a point in working on JS3 where I need to decide: Does GJ or JS3 use too small of type? I use a lot of Accujen (Geneva) 9 point in my program. Is it too small? I¹m looking for gut level response. I want the program to be ³easy on the eyes² I have personally reached the age where I were magnifiers at times. I am finding my own program too hard to read at normal monitor resolutions. I am looking for input from the prols, the masses, the throngs. (Kidding) If I get a bunch of good responses, it will really help me in my work right now. Responses can (and actually hopefully will be) short. Looking for gut level, eye level, responses. Richard (Das Goravani) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.