Guest guest Posted October 16, 2006 Report Share Posted October 16, 2006 Provided Kaal Sarpa is not just a so called dosh. Can we look at it from another angle and say that Kaal Sarp is a yoga which begins to fructify at 42...if so then Rahu at 42 is conventional too! regards rishi , "Rohiniranjan" <jyotish_vani wrote: > > I see the logic in what you are saying but submit the following: > > This runs a bit counter to the statements made here and at other > places by some, recently that after 42 years or so, KSY ceases to > afflict nativities. I do not know what is the original source of that > thinking. > > Secondly, is the consideration of sanivad rahu kujavat ketu. This > would peg Rahu to fit in the 42-60 zone but ketu to an earlier phase > of life, around 28 years -- the age attributed to mars. > > RR > > , rishi shukla > <rishi_2000in@> wrote: > > > > The nodes are all pervasive being the shadows that > > they are. > > They hold on to a (wo)man in different ages as shadows > > of different planets. > > Some say, the ages 42 to 60...more nodal, is that > > because that is the corresponding sun age and > > eclipsean factor.... > > rishi > > > > --- Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > moon in childhood > > > mercury in teenage > > > venus and mars as long as the young adults remain > > > productive > > > sun while the feeling of being a father prevails > > > Jupiter is all about banaprastha > > > Saturn about old age > > > rahu and ketu -- the enigmas > > > I better not bias your minds, at least those who are > > > still listening! > > > > > > What ages and stages of wo/man do the nodes > > > represent, in your opinion? > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2006 Report Share Posted October 16, 2006 Yes Rishi. , "rishi_2000in" <rishi_2000in wrote: > > Provided Kaal Sarpa is not just a so called dosh. > Can we look at it from another angle and say that Kaal Sarp is a yoga > which begins to fructify at 42...if so then Rahu at 42 is > conventional too! > regards > rishi > > , "Rohiniranjan" > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > I see the logic in what you are saying but submit the following: > > > > This runs a bit counter to the statements made here and at other > > places by some, recently that after 42 years or so, KSY ceases to > > afflict nativities. I do not know what is the original source of > that > > thinking. > > > > Secondly, is the consideration of sanivad rahu kujavat ketu. This > > would peg Rahu to fit in the 42-60 zone but ketu to an earlier > phase > > of life, around 28 years -- the age attributed to mars. > > > > RR > > > > , rishi shukla > > <rishi_2000in@> wrote: > > > > > > The nodes are all pervasive being the shadows that > > > they are. > > > They hold on to a (wo)man in different ages as shadows > > > of different planets. > > > Some say, the ages 42 to 60...more nodal, is that > > > because that is the corresponding sun age and > > > eclipsean factor.... > > > rishi > > > > > > --- Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > moon in childhood > > > > mercury in teenage > > > > venus and mars as long as the young adults remain > > > > productive > > > > sun while the feeling of being a father prevails > > > > Jupiter is all about banaprastha > > > > Saturn about old age > > > > rahu and ketu -- the enigmas > > > > I better not bias your minds, at least those who are > > > > still listening! > > > > > > > > What ages and stages of wo/man do the nodes > > > > represent, in your opinion? > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.