Transit effects of Planets -should it be reckoned from Natal Moon or Lagna

[Guest guest]

Hi All Astrologers

 

I am now initiating a new discussion about Transit of

Planets.Traditionally transtit of planets is reckoned from Natal

Moon,but many astrologers reckoned the transit effects from Aascendent

(Lagna).Please come out with your expereinces which method gives more

accuracy in predictions and how much weightage should be given to Moon

and Ascendent.Many times one planet in transit is auspicious from Moon

but bad from Ascendent and vice a versa.

 

Also few astrologers see the Transit effects of Planets from

Mahadasa lords and Antardasha Lord's position in Lagna chart.Also give

your experinces in this regard.

 

Thank you

[Guest guest]

As per Chandrakala nadi the effect of transit planets is to be seen from

Lagna and the calculation that is given in terms of its results are also

unique - ( i am quote straight from Sri C.S. Patel's book and so far it has

given consistent results )

 

Saturn say is transiting over Lagna (Aries). We all know Saturn aspects 3H,

7H & 10H. Saturn being natural Karaka for Longevity thanks to his co-born

sibling i.e. Lord Yama"raj",

so start "reverse"count the 8houses from 3H = natal 8H

so start "reverse"count the 8houses from 7H = natal 12H

so start "reverse"count the 8houses H from 10H = natal 3H

because it is posited in Lagna start counting reverse 8Houses = 6H

 

So, finally, we now have the natal 3H, 6H, 8H & 12H which are activated.

Being a Malefic planet it gives negative results. If these houses happens

to be of friends or enemy's( summary of natural & temporal friendship

tradeoff calculations ), the results are moderated.

 

Further, Sri C. S. Patel mentions the transits to be also seen closeness of

degrees with respect to House Lord for better timing.

 

with regards,

sreeram srinivas

 

_____

 

 

[] On Behalf Of drramankapur

Sunday, October 15, 2006 3:22 PM

 

Transit effects of Planets -should it be reckoned from Natal

Moon or Lagna

 

 

 

Hi All Astrologers

 

I am now initiating a new discussion about Transit of

Planets.Traditionally transtit of planets is reckoned from Natal

Moon,but many astrologers reckoned the transit effects from Aascendent

(Lagna).Please come out with your expereinces which method gives more

accuracy in predictions and how much weightage should be given to Moon

and Ascendent.Many times one planet in transit is auspicious from Moon

but bad from Ascendent and vice a versa.

 

Also few astrologers see the Transit effects of Planets from

Mahadasa lords and Antardasha Lord's position in Lagna chart.Also give

your experinces in this regard.

 

Thank you

 

..

 

<http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=9699862/grpspId=1705082690/msgId

=36450/stime=1160905969/nc1=3848640/nc2=3848568/nc3=3848578>

[Guest guest]

I use all three, i.e., lagna, rashi and Dayesh. One astrologer whose

system is not discussed on this board had also recommended that the

transit of anthara or pratyantar lord should be studied too.

 

In my experience, it is not an either or, black or white kind of

thing. Successful predictions and a posteriori studies (sometimes

incorrectly termed 'post-mortem' analysis) indicate that each of

these can work in different cases.

 

There is also the tenet/practice, presumably used by nakshatra

astrologers that involves considering the passage of the lights or

other significant planets through the nakshatras of dasha/bhukti

lords.

 

To add another layer to this, may I remind you that according to Sage

Satyacharya, the prevailing (vimshottari) dasa should be selected

based on which is strongest in the chart: moon, lagna or sun. Some

have added lagna lord (to equalize the playing field, since lagna

sphut does not represent a heavenly body).

 

I hope this is not confusing anyone, if it is, my apologies.

 

Though not hundred percent effective, long ago trying to climb out of

the hole in the ground created by all these multiple factors and so

on, I created for my benefit the 'democratic' principle in astrology.

I look for what majority of indicators are pointing at. Often works

for me.

 

Thanks and I am sorry for my long post. Hopefully no one will be

irritated too much by it.

 

Rohiniranjan

 

 

 

 

, "drramankapur"

<drramankapur wrote:

>

> Hi All Astrologers

>

> I am now initiating a new discussion about Transit of

> Planets.Traditionally transtit of planets is reckoned from Natal

> Moon,but many astrologers reckoned the transit effects from

Aascendent

> (Lagna).Please come out with your expereinces which method gives

more

> accuracy in predictions and how much weightage should be given to

Moon

> and Ascendent.Many times one planet in transit is auspicious from

Moon

> but bad from Ascendent and vice a versa.

>

> Also few astrologers see the Transit effects of Planets from

> Mahadasa lords and Antardasha Lord's position in Lagna chart.Also

give

> your experinces in this regard.

>

> Thank you

>

[Guest guest]

dear readers,

i would like to share my observation. I am not quoting

from any text material, but interepretation with

analouges is being shared here. At the time of birth

the individuals natal chart reflects the celestial

position which is a permanent and its effects like

aspects, exaltation, benefics and malefics are

experienced thro the life. It is like a permanent

home. But u can always shift ur residence to some

other place due to transfer or due to other reasons

but ur permanent home doesnt vanish because u may have

ur relatives there or a caretaker or u keep it locked

and come once in a while to see. so whatever happpens

to ur permanent home has a direct bearing on u even if

u shift. similarly transits of planets happen round

the year depending upon the speed with which the

planet travels. so its effect on the chart will change

but the natal chart positions will have a chek on the

good or bad effect of the transit. Eg; u leave ur

house and go out on a holiday for 3mths or 6mths, u

take adequate precaution to lock the house or keep a

caretaker or ask ur neighbours to look after.

Similairly the good and the bad planetary positions in

the natal chart will act accordingly upon the transit.

Transit is always seen from the moon since we follow

lunar calendar, at least in south india.

 

with good wishes,

k.gopu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

||Jai Ramakrishna||

Dear Learned Members,

The Natal Moon represents--our mind, thoughts, while the Lagna

represents our --physique....now the effect of transit (or its

impact) affects both our physique & mind(if the health is bad, mind

maynt be cheerful except few exceptions, while if the mind is not

well, health may deteriorate, few exceptions though..)...

If we see Ashtakavarga while analysing the Transits, then we should

consider it from Lagna(which i do)...

While decoding the Dasa results, one should be wise enuf to consider

the Antardasa effects, from the Daayesh (Mahadasa lord) both in

Rashi & Navamsha(as Navamsha is the chart of our luck & fortune,

other than of marital happiness)....

All these are outputs of my humble practise...

Thanq

With Humbleness,

Wish u all success,

.

 

, "Rohiniranjan"

<jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> I use all three, i.e., lagna, rashi and Dayesh. One astrologer

whose

> system is not discussed on this board had also recommended that

the

> transit of anthara or pratyantar lord should be studied too.

>

> In my experience, it is not an either or, black or white kind of

> thing. Successful predictions and a posteriori studies (sometimes

> incorrectly termed 'post-mortem' analysis) indicate that each of

> these can work in different cases.

>

> There is also the tenet/practice, presumably used by nakshatra

> astrologers that involves considering the passage of the lights or

> other significant planets through the nakshatras of dasha/bhukti

> lords.

>

> To add another layer to this, may I remind you that according to

Sage

> Satyacharya, the prevailing (vimshottari) dasa should be selected

> based on which is strongest in the chart: moon, lagna or sun. Some

> have added lagna lord (to equalize the playing field, since lagna

> sphut does not represent a heavenly body).

>

> I hope this is not confusing anyone, if it is, my apologies.

>

> Though not hundred percent effective, long ago trying to climb out

of

> the hole in the ground created by all these multiple factors and

so

> on, I created for my benefit the 'democratic' principle in

astrology.

> I look for what majority of indicators are pointing at. Often

works

> for me.

>

> Thanks and I am sorry for my long post. Hopefully no one will be

> irritated too much by it.

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

>

>

>

> , "drramankapur"

> <drramankapur@> wrote:

> >

> > Hi All Astrologers

> >

> > I am now initiating a new discussion about Transit of

> > Planets.Traditionally transtit of planets is reckoned from Natal

> > Moon,but many astrologers reckoned the transit effects from

> Aascendent

> > (Lagna).Please come out with your expereinces which method gives

> more

> > accuracy in predictions and how much weightage should be given

to

> Moon

> > and Ascendent.Many times one planet in transit is auspicious

from

> Moon

> > but bad from Ascendent and vice a versa.

> >

> > Also few astrologers see the Transit effects of Planets from

> > Mahadasa lords and Antardasha Lord's position in Lagna

chart.Also

> give

> > your experinces in this regard.

> >

> > Thank you

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sade-Sati is a different phenomenon,....the classics are all clear that this

needs to be seen from Moon......for Saturn afflicts Moon.......well, if you

want some innovation...in the name of research.....I shall open another

pandora box......yes....why not see it from the position itself.....as said

by Sri C. S. Patel through his interpretation of Chandrakalanadi...

 

Try to get events of Sade-Sati as it transits through Lagna.......for the

same reason.....take transit positions of Saturn in any house....and relate

it with the events of that house.....you WILL find some correlation......in

mundane ......saturn transiting Leo is said to bring downfall of govt.

........

 

with regards,

sreeram srinivas

 

_____

 

Vedic Astrology-Hyderabad

[Vedic Astrology-Hyderabad] On Behalf Of puneet ahuja

Sunday, October 15, 2006 10:09 PM

Vedic Astrology-Hyderabad

Re: [Vedic Astrology-Hyderabad] Fwd: Transit effects of Planets

-should it be reckoned from Natal Moon or Lagna

 

 

 

 

SADE SATI or SATURN transting 12 1 ,2 from Moon not from lagna-

 

Kindly give your commnets for above.

 

kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09 > wrote:

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------

sreeram srinivas <sreeram64 (AT) satyam (DOT) <sreeram64%40satyam.net.in>

net.in>

Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:09:06 +0530

RE: Transit effects of Planets -should it be reckoned from

Natal Moon or Lagna

@ <%40>

 

Cc: drramankapur <drramankapur@ <drramankapur%40>

>, kishore patnaik

<kishorepatnaik09@ <kishorepatnaik09%40gmail.com> gmail.com>,

KNRaoJyotish@ <KNRaoJyotish%40> ,

ancient_indian_ <%40>

astrology

 

As per Chandrakala nadi the effect of transit planets is to be seen from

Lagna and the calculation that is given in terms of its results are also

unique - ( i am quote straight from Sri C.S. Patel's book and so far it has

given consistent results )

 

Saturn say is transiting over Lagna (Aries). We all know Saturn aspects 3H,

7H & 10H. Saturn being natural Karaka for Longevity thanks to his co-born

sibling i.e. Lord Yama"raj",

so start "reverse"count the 8houses from 3H = natal 8H

so start "reverse"count the 8houses from 7H = natal 12H

so start "reverse"count the 8houses H from 10H = natal 3H

because it is posited in Lagna start counting reverse 8Houses = 6H

 

So, finally, we now have the natal 3H, 6H, 8H & 12H which are activated.

Being a Malefic planet it gives negative results. If these houses happens

to be of friends or enemy's( summary of natural & temporal friendship

tradeoff calculations ), the results are moderated.

 

Further, Sri C. S. Patel mentions the transits to be also seen closeness of

degrees with respect to House Lord for better timing.

 

with regards,

sreeram srinivas

 

_____

 

@ <%40>

 

[@ <%40>

] On Behalf Of drramankapur

Sunday, October 15, 2006 3:22 PM

@ <%40>

 

Transit effects of Planets -should it be reckoned from Natal

Moon or Lagna

 

Hi All Astrologers

 

I am now initiating a new discussion about Transit of

Planets.Traditionally transtit of planets is reckoned from Natal

Moon,but many astrologers reckoned the transit effects from Aascendent

(Lagna).Please come out with your expereinces which method gives more

accuracy in predictions and how much weightage should be given to Moon

and Ascendent.Many times one planet in transit is auspicious from Moon

but bad from Ascendent and vice a versa.

 

Also few astrologers see the Transit effects of Planets from

Mahadasa lords and Antardasha Lord's position in Lagna chart.Also give

your experinces in this regard.

 

Thank you

 

..

 

<http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=17819432/grpspId=1705082690/msgI

d=300/stime=1160930374/nc1=3848585/nc2=3848569/nc3=3848641>