House vs. Sign - which is more important?Correction

[Guest guest]

Wrong: "The strength of sign determines the

strength of its controllong lord for any particular house "

 

Correction: The strength of sign determines the

strength of the planet occuping that sign, for any particular

house. The planet occupying any sign can be its controlling lord or

any other planet.

 

The degrees of the sign at which the planet resides in the sign give

the strength factor i.e., balyavastha, yuva-awastha(full strength

range), vridhaawastha(old age strength) etc.,

 

, "Rajesh M. Kumaria"

<rajeshkumaria2000 wrote:

>

> Yes I think you are right Sir, The strength of sign determines the

> strength of its controllong lord for any particular house i.e.,

ALso

> the Lords of various signs become malefic/benfic depending upon

the

> Lagna, Kendras, Upachayas and Apokilimas signs i.e., Natural

Benfics

> become Functional malefic if they occupy kendras and vice-versa

> etc., So Signs and houses are critically related as per basic of

> this science(any good author's book can give all these

> combinations)...Planet's own signs, exaltation sign, debilitation

> signs, mooltrikona signs etc., I think once the natal planet's

> strength based on its sign lordship and house positioning is

> determined, then one can go into dasa systems and apply various

> dasa system rules...from that point onwards the house placements

> with respect to Lagna and/or house placements with respect to

> MahaDasa Lordships becomes critical for prediction points of view

> (which Is what I am still learning)...no wonder people get

confused

> whether sign is important or house is important? Infact the actual

> thing is that natal planet's strength and poistioning is closely

> related to both its actual sign placement and house placment....(I

> could go on but I thnk I should stop here since the rest is open

to

> actual prediction, investigations, expereiences and books only).

>

> , "sagar.astro"

> <sagar.astro@> wrote:

> >

> > , "iam_1972" <iam_1972@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Learned astrologers: please comment on whether the House is

> more

> > > important or whether the Sign is more important? Thank you

> kindly.

> > >

> > evry house has its own departments and sphares represented by it

> they

> > always remain same irrespective of the sighn that house falls in

> it

> > will represent only those matteres only assiened to it, but

> according

> > to the sighn those matters either improve or become weak,if the

> sighn

> > is weaker or strong, because every sighn itself belongs to a

> > particular house of KAAL PURSHA .

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear friends,

For the beginners to start with:-

(i) Please note the house or bhava result on the basis of ownership of the other houses by the planet

(ii) next the planet's natural relationship with the sign lord

(iii)next the strength of the dispositor planet

(iv) finally arrive at a conclusive result

about the - subject matter of the house occupied by the planet

- the subject matter ruled by the planet on account of its ownership of other house or houses

->usingASTAKAVARGA & principle of ARGALA.

with best wishes,

Mrutyunjay

 

 

My personal email id is astrologer.mrutyunjay for out of group contact and professional consultations.

 

How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.