[HinduThought] Correspondence with Dr Kealey-A British Bigot & 'Scholar'

[Guest guest]

HinduThought, "Ashok Chowgule" <ashokvc

wrote:

 

Whether Dr Kealey is an authority on Indian history or not is

irrelevant. He has written a bigotted article, and instead of

apologising he has defended his bigotry. And the fact that The

Times

published the rubbish makes things worse.

 

Namaste.

Ashok Chowgule

 

 

 

-

"Vrndavan Parker" <vrnparker

<hinduthought>

Friday, September 29, 2006 5:29 AM

[HinduThought] Re: [world-vedic] Correspondence with Dr

Kealey-A British Bigot & 'Scholar'

 

 

vediculture, Jan <janjm@> wrote:

 

Hare Krishna Ashok et all,

 

since Dr Kealey is a biochemist he can't be considered an authority

on

Indian history (see

http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/Professor_of_Nothing).

Again we see this over and over again repeated denigrating focus on

marginal aspects of Indian culture and history presented as typical.

Cui

bono?

Are tantric-like Adamites and witch burning typical for Western

religion

and history?

His article couldn't even provide an answer to its original

question,

i.e. that Khajuraho sculptures reflect views of tantric Chandela

dynasty.

 

Your servant, bh. Jan

 

www.vrindavan-dham.com

www.veda.harekrsna.cz

(Bhakti-yoga, Vedic Encyclopedia, Vedic Library, Connections, Links)

 

--- End forwarded message ---