Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Hare Krishna Ashok et all, since Dr Kealey is a biochemist he can't be considered an authority on Indian history (see http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/Professor_of_Nothing). Again we see this over and over again repeated denigrating focus on marginal aspects of Indian culture and history presented as typical. Cui bono? Are tantric-like Adamites and witch burning typical for Western religion and history? His article couldn't even provide an answer to its original question, i.e. that Khajuraho sculptures reflect views of tantric Chandela dynasty. Your servant, bh. Jan www.vrindavan-dham.com www.veda.harekrsna.cz (Bhakti-yoga, Vedic Encyclopedia, Vedic Library, Connections, Links) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.