Hi Tanvirji 20/9 -

[Guest guest]

Dear Tanvir, Ganesh,

 

Ganesh i am sorry if I hurt u by using ur name here

 

I had only mentioned or suggestind about tow more to compliment not to

undermine the moderator, did I?

 

as from a non moderated one to a moderated one is itself a great

forward looking change.

 

in such a scene it helps if such resourceful ones with vedic culture,

remedies did also compliment the job.

 

like i said my limited time ehre made me choose some names an dno

personal preferecne was there is the point in whatver names i have

hinted also said if trhere r others Tanvirji or rest may know.

 

but all were suggestive not any demant or critism or a demand.

 

I dont see why u made so much of it can't reply below ur poitns felt

it hard now with so many eye checks/tests i had in past 3 days so

briefly did may be some time this week end can see more.

 

HI ALL HERE I HAVE NO AGENDA I HAD JUST had a suggestive role aftrer

reading a few dissenting mails only, if my contribution hurt anyone I

am deeply soorry, this was not the intention just to make the best of

the opportunity that came up, I also said I have no issues with the

moderator several times, so I STOP here.

 

 

that is it.

 

-- In , "sriganeshh" <sriganeshh

wrote:

>

> Dear Prashant,

>

> I think Sri.Tanvir has explained everything in detail to you why he

> has to resort to this recourse. still your continuing mails on this

> subject is a mystery. why and for what purpose u r trying to sell

> this two moderator concept? where is the end to it..?

>

> can u elaborate on certain points again and again raised in your

> mails..

> 1. you say ur comments are not personal but then why u r naming

> ashutosh..in each and every mail.

>

> 2. could you explain what is the link between the belief in gods and

> prescribing remedies as suggested in jyotish classics...u r trying

> to read/do too much citing the name of religion.

>

> 3. U r seeing the freedom u r enjoying but still u say //he allows

> them freedom to do so// ...am not getting ur intentions..

>

> 4. //I felt any member who moderates such a site titled Jyotish

> > remedies can make best use if he has such a background himself//

>

> I really could not get what u r intending to say..the title JR is

> preamble and u need to see/read/understand the main objects of the

> forum..which in my opinion does not really demand religious

> background...this fact again has been clarified by Tanvir...i pray u

> get the message loud and clear and inspite of this ur repeated msgs

> mean / convey some other motives...

>

>

> 5. //well, I did discover Sriganesh ji has also such a background //

>

> Please dont involve and take my name as my religion taught me to

> renounce everything and not demand. For your info, Tanvir is more

> informed and he knows what to do in the best interest of his own

> baby...Nobody has asked you to quote or give names but u still keep

> this matter alive for your own reasons...

>

> 6.//I have admited I hardly know the site from 8 months and others

> here r there for a longer time so I had suggested a name i felt that

> was more occuring , but as Sriganesh or Tatvamsai or anyone can also

> fill such slot if they r willing that you can recall or associate

> with will add value.//

>

> U mean to say now the site has no value with tanvir and ash as

> moderators...? All these days what u were doing...U urself admit

> that u just 8 months in this group but u talk as if u own this group

> trying to sell ur concept...

>

> 7. //The choice is surely yours finally and lets give this a shot

> and see if we need any changes in sometime later. we must give this

> a fair run and see, my coments are mere suggestive and nothing more

> the voices that had protested are here longer than me so I am not

> sure how they read the situationa nnd how many may remain here//

>

> see the colourful words...how nicely u r again selling..good. Thanks

> a lot and u need not have any fears (rather i say it is your wish).

> It is an institution and it will remain for years to come with the

> grace of god and tanvir has done lot of hardwork and it will always

> be rewarded irrespective of whether u remain or i remain..we may

> come and go....but it will remain.

>

> 8. Abt ur mentioning abt Sri.Vattem krishnanji...yes i respect and

> he is true professional to the core and he always sticked to reading

> requests and never went out of focus...

>

> FINALLY I WISH TO CLOSE THIS MAIL COPYING PARA FROM EARLIER MAIL OF

> BLISSWITHIN

> ***Let's not confuse facts. This is not really democracy. This is a

> started by someone and they obviously are entitled to do

> what they feel is the best. And why not. After all it was them who

> put in the time and effort to make this a successful popular group.

> They should retain that right. I think the problem lies in our

> expectations that it should be a democracy.***

>

> thanks and all the best wishes

>

> sriganeshh

>