Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 Dear Tanjir ji, I was just reading only your messages and none others in a row as I rarely get to read yours and is nice to see u active here. I read ur msgs to Pt arjuns after I read urs to mine and I never know the picture u have covered till then, else would not have still suggested the same line i took when i suggest a poll a few days ago or fesh poll now but whatever I know of u, u r kind and reasonable as when u lifted my ban u had shown good reason and valued feed backs, for what little I know arjun he is a knowledgele person but can't say why this misunderstands have come he has always shown u in good esteem so far. the ones who wrote on my message but framed their own line on the siking ship was from a fear I felt that if few readers who contribute seriously will be bad for such a good site. This was a suggestive one only not a call for anyone to take a life boat. I know ur a good judge and will do the best as always and the numbers I am not sure unless we split it as i gave many victims of Bhaskar may still want him banned but as it is clubbed with asutosh as moderator can't surely say if they want him also in same numbers. I guees. this if from the point of his opposition my position was always clear no issues if he is there just that any other beliver also needs to be in that is all. I may post again tom only after seeing the the mails have a few eye hecks up y'day and tommorrow so not doing strainful readings this I have to think and type need not look at the monitor for it so some typos are also a pleanty. btw i have a sight of 6/60, Nystagmus, low vision, long sight Extrophia [that is one eye is not sensitive to light unless other is closed) but for the lvoe of spreading astrology here I have no otehr vested interest i have had many good new comers clarify their doubts on the subject and is a rewarding time here. Thanks Prashant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 Dear Prashant Ji Thanks. If you feel another poll is needed, please create. Many forums restrict members from creating polls but here you can. Also, if you (and some others) think that Ashutosh Ji's atheism is a problem (I am not sure whether he is an atheist or not, but still) and a religiou, God fearing moderator should be added then I will judge how many of people think that another moderator is needed and then I will arrange a vote again. However, as I think that the most needed quality in a moderator that he should be JUST and UNBIASED, atheism or anything does not really matter. For an example, if a person is just and unbiased, he could moderate JR even if he does not believe in Jyotish ! It is about fair judgement and giving/assuring rights to members through limiting hates, attacks, meanness etc. So just being unbiased and just would suffice. Awaiting your valueable suggestion. Regards Tanvir , "YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER" <gbp_kumar wrote: > > Dear Tanjir ji, > > I was just reading only your messages and none others in a row as I > rarely get to read yours and is nice to see u active here. > > I read ur msgs to Pt arjuns after I read urs to mine and I never know > the picture u have covered till then, else would not have still > suggested the same line i took when i suggest a poll a few days ago or > fesh poll now > > but whatever I know of u, u r kind and reasonable as when u lifted my > ban u had shown good reason and valued feed backs, for what little I > know arjun he is a knowledgele person but can't say why this > misunderstands have come he has always shown u in good esteem so far. > > > the ones who wrote on my message but framed their own line on the > siking ship was from a fear I felt that if few readers who contribute > seriously will be bad for such a good site. > > This was a suggestive one only not a call for anyone to take a life boat. > > I know ur a good judge and will do the best as always > > and the numbers I am not sure unless we split it as i gave many > victims of Bhaskar may still want him banned but as it is clubbed with > asutosh as moderator can't surely say if they want him also in same > numbers. I guees. this if from the point of his opposition my position > was always clear no issues if he is there just that any other beliver > also needs to be in that is all. > > > I may post again tom only after seeing the the mails have a few eye > hecks up y'day and tommorrow so not doing strainful readings this I > have to think and type need not look at the monitor for it so some > typos are also a pleanty. > > btw i have a sight of 6/60, Nystagmus, low vision, long sight > Extrophia [that is one eye is not sensitive to light unless other is > closed) but for the lvoe of spreading astrology here I have no otehr > vested interest i have had many good new comers clarify their doubts > on the subject and is a rewarding time here. > > Thanks > > Prashant > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2006 Report Share Posted September 20, 2006 Dear Prashant Ji, Just wanted to you to observe a person who openly denies his faith in religion ,God ,is by no means an aethist,but jus consider has the person cross those boundaries of the so called religion ,there is something called universal consciousness where all know there is no God,it's only the SELF OR SELF REALISATION,and which has no boundaries. Religion and God is a stepping stone to the higher self. As u have suggested let there be a moderator with religion but not a hypocrite ( in a holy garb),who can feed on the weakness of the querent in the name of religion and its remedies. its a well known fact our puranas are called MYTHOLOGICAL ,they are meant for all,some pay respect to the book ,other pay respect to the characters,and some take out the nectar from them and then discard the book.I have yet to see anyone carrying his schooling books with him and praying them or the characters. Just for a moment think " ASHUTOSHJI " ????? then decide wat others are trying to put words in the mouth of the members. I do agree the vedic remedies work but again it needs dedication and believe me lot of money,any body claiming that for a few hundred or 2/3 thousand he can change or help the person then he is fooling himself and the customer either by selling yanttra,tantra or etc. why all this hue and cry its the property of Mr tanvir ,its his ship ,let him handle it .In fact the astrologer should thank him that due to the group they are able to get some paid readings and earn some money decently ,instead of supporting we are going against them. As far as Bhaskar ji is concerned we can request him and Ashutosh ji to reinstate him as some flow of knowledge and a strong contender in answering queries is there. With due respect to you Kumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.