Ayanamsha values

[Guest guest]

What were the ayanamsha values for January 1 in the following years,

by your calculations"

 

1900

1930

1960

1990

2020

 

Thanks

 

, "rishi_2000in"

<rishi_2000in wrote:

>

> Ranjanji,

> The atmosphere in the group does not seem conducive to such

debates.

> Still,for whatit is worth.

> That Nirayana zodiac is linked to chitra or revati is again an

> assumption. We seem to be stuck in a situation where despite the

> clear caution in the classics regarding desh, kaal etc we do not

want

> to give credence to kaal!

> The graha laghava paddhathi is fantastically accurate ...but for

the

> period in which it was written in the 15th century!

> The formula suggested for ayanamsha calculation is good and simple

> indeed but the author never thought that six hundred years later

the

> same formula will still be applied.

> I think a relook is needed.

>

> Secondly,do jyotishis validate the movement of sun by unfolding of

> events in the charts?

> Do jyotishis validate the concept of rashi by successful

predictions

> or do they use rashi as a tool to predict?

> I would say here that there are so many factors that you can

predict

> successfully without concepts too.

> > "Jyotishis have generally (strongly) stated that the validity of

a

> > given ayanamsha is easily proven or demonstrated by successful

> > predictions and good concordances between divisional chart and

the

> > actual unfolding of traits or events in the nativity's life."

>

> You have given enough counterarguments in your mail about this. You

> are right, the determination of Zero has little relevance because

of

> the manifold factors involved.

> However, when we take up Jyotish as a science, we need to establish

> certain basics and therefore my attempt. I am indeed fortunate and

> blessed that I attempted to corelate these cycles. It is not

material

> if it is useful or not for that is not my ambition.

> I would rather stay in this beginner's class and try to curiously

ask

> the "whys" of Jyotish and am grateful that there are some answers

if

> one cares to look for rather than accepting an answer just because

> Guruji said so or translated it in his perception of what Parasara

> said.

> regards

>

> rishi

>

> Raah usiki diya usika

> mujhe to bas chalna hai

>