: Arjun ji's post (a portion therefrom 16/9

[Guest guest]

Prafulla,

and arjun,

I agree on this but lest give this new moderator a chance and see before judging him.

I will ask for Bhakar being back some time once we see the picture though he had also had issues with me and complaiend on me still can ask him back too.

lsts give him a chance to cool down and come backm ban is not good for anyone.

Prashant

 

Prafulla Gang <jyotish (AT) inbox (DOT) com> wrote: Dear Pandit Arjun ji,

(this mail is reproduction of portion of my mail to Ashutosh - yesterday evening - which has not been responded so far)

I would have appreciated moderator's stand on Bhaskar - had the moderation rules being announced and then any violation taken place. But, after yesterday's bit of conversation between Ashutosh and Bhaskar, now Ashutosh's action - even if justifiable, leaves a question on his impartial decision (as done in view of his prejudice per, his complaint to Tanveer ji - as he stated). And moderator's image as fair person is a big question mark then?

I am writing this, inspite of the fact that - I has many bitter conversations with Bhaskar (compared to any other member). But Ban is something, which any reasonable person, must exercise after setting rules, prior warning, personal warning and then as last resort.

regards / Prafulla Gang

If you paint in your mind a picture of bright and happy expectations, you put yourself into a condition conducive to your goal.

************************************************

>

> panditarjun2004

> Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:15:23 -0000

>

> Re: Arjun ji's post (a portion therefrom>

>

> Dear RRji

>

> in the last episode of GBPKumarji's banning only one active

> astrologer viz. ashutoshji kept silent and didnot ask for following

> a procedure of warning or for reinstatement. all members, including

> you and me, suggested a warning to precede banning.

>

> in the current episode of Bhaskarji's banning too some active

> astrologers who asked to follow a procedure earlier are now silent.

> with this, the group is getting a message conveyed that these

> members are comfortable and not worried by the sword shown by the

> moderator instantly after getting power, as that sword will not fall

> on them. in the last incident ashutoshji was silent and now he is

> the moderator. so may i expect the other luminaries who are silent

> now to become moderators of tomorrow and they also show their sword

> or become ambidexterous and show swords to remove members instantly.

>

> anyway these are my personal observations of the happenings in the

> group which you may trash as an unwarranted concern of an active

> contributor or respond to the reality that all are members here and

> a procedure has to be followed for removal of a member, for tomrrow

> it can be me and the day after it can be you. as the entire group

> has seen, i will be the first person to cry for any member even if

> he is wrong because we are here to serve or help or assist others

> and not punish. only the moderator is thinking of punitive measures

> on the pretext of imposing peace in the group.

>

> with best wishes

> pandit arjun

>

>

> , "crystal pages"

> <jyotish_vani wrote:

>>

>> Dear Arjun ji,

>>

>> I am just quoting a small portion of your message that I wish to

> second

>> and wholeheartedly agree to.

>>

>> RR

>>

>>

>> , "panditarjun2004"

>> <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

>>>

>>> ... i know tanvir ji very

>>> well and he built a great ashram and he was hardly into

> moderation

>>> of mails which is the hallmark of his maturity. on a personal

> note

>>> i rate tanvirji and this group as the most democratic group on

> the

>>> net.

>>> ...

>>

 

 

Prashantkumar G B

-*- The services of this astrologer are free on group but

off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or phone.

Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also

Personal ID astro.prashantkumar

09840051861

 

 

 

 

 

Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.