Question with regard to progeny - to Chandrasekhar ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrasekhar ji and learned members,

I am looking into a Saptamsa chart, the Ascendant is in Virgo, an even sign. So, counting in reverse, the 5th house will be Taurus an even sign. Here, Moon tenants this house. By rasi and planet tenanted it is clear that the first child will be a female. The mother has acknowledged that the first child is a female.

After the birth of this child she conceived but had to abort that child on medical advice. This happened in 2004. Have been trying to conceive. Doctors who examined both parents find that both are healthy and there is no question of both having lost their fertility.

From Taurus, I count in reverse and reach the 7th house which is Pisces. This is an even sign. However, following the exception to the rule, Pisces will give a male child. Sun and Mars tenant this house. According to Rule 2 both these planets ought to give male child.

Now comes the important question. If one encounters the Nodes whilst counting in Mandooka Gati, then the Gati ends unless Jupiter is strong in Saptamsa.

In the instant case, Rahu is in Aries. Does that end the counting. Jupiter is in Moolatrikona in Sagittarius.

Visti Larsen ji's article and PVR Narasimha Rao ji's lesson on Saptamsa state that once the Nodes are encountered then the counting by Mandook Gati ends unless Jupiter is strong in Navamsa (this is according to Visti Larsen ji), unless the planet which supposes to give the second child, is very strong.(Per PVR Narasimha Rao ji).

What do you say? Please enlighten this novice.

Thank you.

David

 

 

 

Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Mail Beta.

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrasekhar ji and learned members,

A correction to my earlier message!

When quoting Visti Larsen ji I had erroneously mentioned 'Navamsa'. Please note that all reference is to the Saptamsa chart.

Thanks.

David

 

David Andrews <dprapus > wrote:

Dear Chandrasekhar ji and learned members,

I am looking into a Saptamsa chart, the Ascendant is in Virgo, an even sign. So, counting in reverse, the 5th house will be Taurus an even sign. Here, Moon tenants this house. By rasi and planet tenanted it is clear that the first child will be a female. The mother has acknowledged that the first child is a female.

After the birth of this child she conceived but had to abort that child on medical advice. This happened in 2004. Have been trying to conceive. Doctors who examined both parents find that both are healthy and there is no question of both having lost their fertility.

>From Taurus, I count in reverse and reach the 7th house which is Pisces. This is an even sign. However, following the exception to the rule, Pisces will give a male child. Sun and Mars tenant this house. According to Rule 2 both these planets ought to give male child.

Now comes the important question. If one encounters the Nodes whilst counting in Mandooka Gati, then the Gati ends unless Jupiter is strong in Saptamsa.

In the instant case, Rahu is in Aries. Does that end the counting. Jupiter is in Moolatrikona in Sagittarius.

Visti Larsen ji's article and PVR Narasimha Rao ji's lesson on Saptamsa state that once the Nodes are encountered then the counting by Mandook Gati ends unless Jupiter is strong in Navamsa (this is according to Visti Larsen ji), unless the planet which supposes to give the second child, is very strong.(Per PVR Narasimha Rao ji).

 

What do you say? Please enlighten this novice.

Thank you.

 

David

 

 

 

 

Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Mail Beta.

[Guest guest]

Dear David,

As far as I can see, Sun and Mars in the sign Pisces could lead to a

male progeny, but could also indicate loss of the progeny on account of

excessive or abnormal bleeding. Nodes if in the bhava indicative of the

progeny under consideration would give the last child. Rahu in Aries

will not indicate that. However the 3rd progeny is indicated by

Capricorn and you will have to analyze that bhava to understand whether

there is likelihood of progeny for the couple. I would suggest you check

up the chart of the spouse too, before arriving at the final decision.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

David Andrews wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrasekhar ji and learned members,

>

> A correction to my earlier message!

> When quoting Visti Larsen ji I had erroneously mentioned 'Navamsa'.

> Please note that all reference is to the Saptamsa chart.

> Thanks.

>

> David

>

>

> David Andrews <dprapus <dprapus%40>> wrote:

> Dear Chandrasekhar ji and learned members,

> I am looking into a Saptamsa chart, the Ascendant is in Virgo, an even

> sign. So, counting in reverse, the 5th house will be Taurus an even

> sign. Here, Moon tenants this house. By rasi and planet tenanted it is

> clear that the first child will be a female. The mother has

> acknowledged that the first child is a female.

> After the birth of this child she conceived but had to abort that

> child on medical advice. This happened in 2004. Have been trying to

> conceive. Doctors who examined both parents find that both are healthy

> and there is no question of both having lost their fertility.

> >From Taurus, I count in reverse and reach the 7th house which is

> Pisces. This is an even sign. However, following the exception to the

> rule, Pisces will give a male child. Sun and Mars tenant this house.

> According to Rule 2 both these planets ought to give male child.

> Now comes the important question. If one encounters the Nodes whilst

> counting in Mandooka Gati, then the Gati ends unless Jupiter is strong

> in Saptamsa.

> In the instant case, Rahu is in Aries. Does that end the counting.

> Jupiter is in Moolatrikona in Sagittarius.

> Visti Larsen ji's article and PVR Narasimha Rao ji's lesson on

> Saptamsa state that once the Nodes are encountered then the counting

> by Mandook Gati ends unless Jupiter is strong in Navamsa (this is

> according to Visti Larsen ji), unless the planet which supposes to

> give the second child, is very strong.(Per PVR Narasimha Rao ji).

>

> What do you say? Please enlighten this novice.

> Thank you.

>

> David

>

>

>

> Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Mail Beta.

>

>