Retractions of Allopathy and Comparative certainty in Ayurveda.

[Guest guest]

To many in west Ayurveda is seen as unproven, and unscientific medical discipline and they

find allopathy more reliable. But is the truth really the other way around? I know there have

been lots of 'health facts' set by allopathy that have been later retracted. e.g. they first

believed cholesterol is bad, than they said it is good, some say beer is bad for health were

some say it is good and now they say tea rehydrates where they first use to believe it dehydrates.

Are there any experts here who know the list of 'retractions'/change of rules that has occurred in allopathy? If there are good enough, then it could be proven that allopathy is more unreliable health science than Ayurveda.

[Guest guest]

You could go through this.

 

The dark history of modern medicine

 

http://www.newstarget.com/z019930.html

Originally published August 10 2006

 

ayurveda, "supernova076" <yamirb

wrote:

>

> To many in west Ayurveda is seen as unproven, and unscientific

medical discipline and they

> find allopathy more reliable. But is the truth really the other way

around?