RE: Attn: P. Kumar

[Guest guest]

Kindly clarify what time is considered as Time of Birth - when umbical cord

is cut or when the baby is touched to the mother earth ( traditional or

orthodox method ) or when the baby's first cry....( what if the baby does

not cry ??? as it happened in a very closely known case where the baby did

not cry for first few days..!!.).etc..

For in all this cases there is a perceptible time difference going by your

logics of counting minutes & seconds..... a little clarification would us

in understanding .....

 

with regards,

 

sreeram srinivas

 

 

_____

 

[] On

Behalf Of P.Kumar

Saturday, July 22, 2006 12:19 AM

vedic astrology; KNRaoJyotish

Cc:

Re: [KNRaoJyotish] Anwer to Question 2 - Attn: P.

Kumar

 

 

 

You wrote:

"...Sri KN Rao takes the 5th house as well since the 5th house is the house

of intelligence."

No, Shri K.N.Rao takes 'primarily' the 5th house for education and not 'as

well'.

 

Then you wrote:

"It is not primarily the house of education but of ones intelligence which

is so important for education."

Is it not your own verdict ? Further, it lacks astrological contents.

 

Now see the conditions and pre-qualifications I had referred to:

1) Before posing such queries, correctness of a chart must be assured or

helpful hints must be provided for rectification. That is why I always ask

for 'source of TOB' and 'margin of error possible'. From Rasi to

Shashtyamsha every chart has its own importance. Shashtyamsha changes every

2 minutes. Thus, need of rectification can never be undermined.

2) The person posing such queries and commenting on responses received must

be a good astrologer himself. Only then a person can appreciates the depth

of astrology and will never comment on an analysis the way you had commented

on the one given by Sreenivas. I consider it quite misguiding and hence most

irresposible.

 

Most persons deviate from basics and start justifying the events on any

given chart as though giving astrological prediction is a child's play. One

should always stick to basics, follow undisputed classical dictums and apply

sound common sense. I always try to stick to basics illustration of which

can be seen in my article on the website of respected Shri K.N.Rao at the

link given below:

http://www.journalo

<http://www.journalofastrology.com/ARTICLES/professional_crises.htm>

fastrology.com/ARTICLES/professional_crises.htm

 

P.Kumar

 

-

Vinay Kumar

KNRaoJyotish@ <KNRaoJyotish%40>

Friday, July 21, 2006 10:25 PM

[KNRaoJyotish] Anwer to Question 2 - Attn: P. Kumar

 

Dear Kumar,

4th house is the house of formal education. You can refer to any

classic and it will say 4th house as the house of formal education. I

do know that Sri KN Rao takes the 5th house as well since the 5th

house is the house of intelligence. It is not primarily the house of

education but of ones intelligence which is so important for

education. So when the 5th house or the 5th lord is strong that also

furthers education. In this way the 5th can also be used for education

and it is not wrong. Remember that a graha in the 5th house has an

argala (intervention) on the 4th house, meaning that for good

education (4th house) the 5th house of intelligence is important. A

benefic in the 5th (Mercury, Guru) is a boon for good education. Apart

from this the 3rd house can be taken for education up to the basic or

primary level. The 9th house can be taken for education of the highest

level, like Phd, doctorates etc.

 

Agreed that an instance or two of correct predictions is not enough,

but at least Sreeram made a start. My compliments for him were only

for this question which he got it right. I personally do not know of

how many such correct predictions he has given; or his depth of the

understanding of the subject or his talent in vast field of Jyotish.

 

BTW what are the conditions and pre-qualifications necessary for

posting queries like the one that I did?

 

Regards,

Vinay

 

 

..

 

<http://geo./serv?s=97359714&grpId=13436625&grpspId=1600082690&msgI

d=11345&stime=1153507918>