Guest guest Posted July 17, 2006 Report Share Posted July 17, 2006 Pt. Arjun I have PL and Visual Jyotish ver 3.0 there the order is 1. Raman 2. Lahiri 3. user-defined 4. Tropical 5. Rosicrucian 6. Fagan-Bradley 7. Deluce 8. Yukteshwar 9. Modified Yukteshwar 10. Krishnamurthy s/w is delvoped by Charles drutman. also read astrology of death the writer Robert Hauck has used KP but has given the history of ayanamsa and the leaders too. he used it as he found kp ok for the reason but his techniques r good otherwise too panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 > wrote: dear friend you are changing your words swifty from PROVEN to SAID. you asked me to give proof of which software puts raman's ayanamsha ahead of KP. since all my statements are based on facts i appreciate if members like you ask me to support and substantiate it. go to the #1 vedic astrology software Parashar. Under Options:Calculations you will find the following ayanamshas: 1. Lahiri 2. None (Sayana) 3. Yukteshwar 4. Raman 5. Bhasin 6. Fagan 7. Krishnamurhty 8. Krishnamurthy New now, may i ask you to furnish the proof with which you made a statement that raman's ayanamsha was PROVEN WRONG. with best wishes pandit arjun , Bhaskar Maheswari <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Before You ask me proof- > Can You give proof that these softwares put Ramans Ayanamsha ahead of Kps. Can You give proof that many astrologers are using Raman ayanamsha ? > Sir many people using Windows DOS applications still or Windows 95 does not prove them wrong or right ? The results have to come in proper when forecasting ?why are You bent on fighting with me I dont understand. I will prove winner if You want to continue so, because I have been studying and not making gullible people fool. Does people who still calculate multiplication on fingers wrong or right ? I will not comment. But when You have a better option like calculator whats wrong in using that ? > Bhaskar > > > Bhaskar Maheswari <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > Sir, > Instead of asking proof if You have been continously doing study in Astrology > and keeping update, then theres was no need for this question ? > I am not here to create differences amongst people by taking names, but the results definitely show when You use different Ayanamshas. Results will > only show if You take up at least 5 horoscopes in a day and check the results > and be honest in Your assessment . > > Bhaskar. > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: > dear bhaskarji > > you wrote: > "Ramans ayanamsha has already been proven wrong by many stalwarts of > this great science" > > this is a news to me as me and many other astrologers are still > using raman's ayanamsha and all astrology softwares like Parashar > give the option of raman's ayanamsha ahead of krishnamurthy > ayanamsha. could you furnish that PROOF and mention who are these > stalwarts who have proved sri B.V.Raman's ayanamsha wrong. > > with best wishes > pandit arjun > > , Bhaskar Maheswari > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Sir, > > That comment of Yours really was humorous and made me smile as I > was reading it. Anyway coming to the point practioners of KP system > are very > > perfect in their results and god astrologers following that > system can really > > give the exact date of marriage too, in a few minutes. So why > not try to use that > > Ayanamsha and verify the subject in question ? Ramans ayanamsha > has already been proven wrong by many stalwarts of this great > science, and Lahiris and Kps differ just by 6 minutes, but it does > make a difference when its on the cusp and the star Lord changes, > then the whole results of the forecast will have a dramatic > change.This is just a suggestion and not an advice. > > Regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > crystal pages <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > Maybe we should all lie prostrate, pray to and ask our > Inner Spirit > > which planet is where, as was suggested recently!! > > > > <loved your railway analogy! Thanks!!> > > > > RR > > > > , Prashant Kumar G B > > <gbp_kumar@> wrote: > > > > > > DEAR READERS > > > according to ramans it is 13-10-06, Lahiri's 1-11-06. > > > > > > well lets see how it goes from here what we need is he likely > > picture of satn in Simha a enemy sign and in 2 malefic stars, > Makha > > and Uttara the field is open with many transits, conjunctions some > > corssing over it etc. so a bland line that it is shifted will make > > little sense, like saying Mumbai- Gorakpur passenger has arrived > on > > platform no 3..... > > > > > > > > > Tarun Chopra <occultwizard.tarun@> > > wrote: dear members > > > > > > just to share that saturn is now in leo acording to my ayanamsha > > (1-1-1155, > > > 50.2719) > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > Tarun Chopra > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.