Guest guest Posted July 16, 2006 Report Share Posted July 16, 2006 This is an interesting post! 5 horoscopes a day over say 350 days (even astrologers go on vacation!} would mean 1750 horoscopes a year. There are some 5000 members here and perhaps another 2000 individuals at other sites (not counting double and triple parked members). If one were to assume that the remaining 100000 jyotish-seekers went to one astrologer, it would keep him or her busy for another 55 years or so. Now since there are probably at least one thousand astrologers practicing jyotish, assuming equal distribution of clients, the work coming to each individual astrologer would be over in 55*12/1000 = approximately 20 days! Then one can go on vacation or maybe take up i- ching! Maybe I am off by an order of magnitude about prospective clients, still hardly an year's work and it is all done! Now, mind you, one runs into those who hop from jyotishi to jyotishi and who I dub "astro-collectors". They continue till they find the jyotishi who confirms in the chart what the client always knew in his/her bones and was dying to hear! Let us not give up our day-jobs, folks! RR , Bhaskar Maheswari <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Sir, > Instead of asking proof if You have been continously doing study in Astrology > and keeping update, then theres was no need for this question ? > I am not here to create differences amongst people by taking names, but the results definitely show when You use different Ayanamshas. Results will > only show if You take up at least 5 horoscopes in a day and check the results > and be honest in Your assessment . > > Bhaskar. > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: > dear bhaskarji > > you wrote: > "Ramans ayanamsha has already been proven wrong by many stalwarts of > this great science" > > this is a news to me as me and many other astrologers are still > using raman's ayanamsha and all astrology softwares like Parashar > give the option of raman's ayanamsha ahead of krishnamurthy > ayanamsha. could you furnish that PROOF and mention who are these > stalwarts who have proved sri B.V.Raman's ayanamsha wrong. > > with best wishes > pandit arjun > > , Bhaskar Maheswari > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Sir, > > That comment of Yours really was humorous and made me smile as I > was reading it. Anyway coming to the point practioners of KP system > are very > > perfect in their results and god astrologers following that > system can really > > give the exact date of marriage too, in a few minutes. So why > not try to use that > > Ayanamsha and verify the subject in question ? Ramans ayanamsha > has already been proven wrong by many stalwarts of this great > science, and Lahiris and Kps differ just by 6 minutes, but it does > make a difference when its on the cusp and the star Lord changes, > then the whole results of the forecast will have a dramatic > change.This is just a suggestion and not an advice. > > Regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > crystal pages <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > Maybe we should all lie prostrate, pray to and ask our > Inner Spirit > > which planet is where, as was suggested recently!! > > > > <loved your railway analogy! Thanks!!> > > > > RR > > > > , Prashant Kumar G B > > <gbp_kumar@> wrote: > > > > > > DEAR READERS > > > according to ramans it is 13-10-06, Lahiri's 1-11-06. > > > > > > well lets see how it goes from here what we need is he likely > > picture of satn in Simha a enemy sign and in 2 malefic stars, > Makha > > and Uttara the field is open with many transits, conjunctions some > > corssing over it etc. so a bland line that it is shifted will make > > little sense, like saying Mumbai- Gorakpur passenger has arrived > on > > platform no 3..... > > > > > > > > > Tarun Chopra <occultwizard.tarun@> > > wrote: dear members > > > > > > just to share that saturn is now in leo acording to my ayanamsha > > (1-1-1155, > > > 50.2719) > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > Tarun Chopra > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2006 Report Share Posted July 16, 2006 Sir better spend time in studying rather than discussing endlessly on worthless issues. This shows lack of work and study. crystal pages <jyotish_vani (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: This is an interesting post! 5 horoscopes a day over say 350 days (even astrologers go on vacation!} would mean 1750 horoscopes a year. There are some 5000 members here and perhaps another 2000 individuals at other sites (not counting double and triple parked members). If one were to assume that the remaining 100000 jyotish-seekers went to one astrologer, it would keep him or her busy for another 55 years or so. Now since there are probably at least one thousand astrologers practicing jyotish, assuming equal distribution of clients, the work coming to each individual astrologer would be over in 55*12/1000 = approximately 20 days! Then one can go on vacation or maybe take up i- ching! Maybe I am off by an order of magnitude about prospective clients, still hardly an year's work and it is all done! Now, mind you, one runs into those who hop from jyotishi to jyotishi and who I dub "astro-collectors". They continue till they find the jyotishi who confirms in the chart what the client always knew in his/her bones and was dying to hear! Let us not give up our day-jobs, folks! RR , Bhaskar Maheswari <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Sir, > Instead of asking proof if You have been continously doing study in Astrology > and keeping update, then theres was no need for this question ? > I am not here to create differences amongst people by taking names, but the results definitely show when You use different Ayanamshas. Results will > only show if You take up at least 5 horoscopes in a day and check the results > and be honest in Your assessment . > > Bhaskar. > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: > dear bhaskarji > > you wrote: > "Ramans ayanamsha has already been proven wrong by many stalwarts of > this great science" > > this is a news to me as me and many other astrologers are still > using raman's ayanamsha and all astrology softwares like Parashar > give the option of raman's ayanamsha ahead of krishnamurthy > ayanamsha. could you furnish that PROOF and mention who are these > stalwarts who have proved sri B.V.Raman's ayanamsha wrong. > > with best wishes > pandit arjun > > , Bhaskar Maheswari > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Sir, > > That comment of Yours really was humorous and made me smile as I > was reading it. Anyway coming to the point practioners of KP system > are very > > perfect in their results and god astrologers following that > system can really > > give the exact date of marriage too, in a few minutes. So why > not try to use that > > Ayanamsha and verify the subject in question ? Ramans ayanamsha > has already been proven wrong by many stalwarts of this great > science, and Lahiris and Kps differ just by 6 minutes, but it does > make a difference when its on the cusp and the star Lord changes, > then the whole results of the forecast will have a dramatic > change.This is just a suggestion and not an advice. > > Regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > crystal pages <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > Maybe we should all lie prostrate, pray to and ask our > Inner Spirit > > which planet is where, as was suggested recently!! > > > > <loved your railway analogy! Thanks!!> > > > > RR > > > > , Prashant Kumar G B > > <gbp_kumar@> wrote: > > > > > > DEAR READERS > > > according to ramans it is 13-10-06, Lahiri's 1-11-06. > > > > > > well lets see how it goes from here what we need is he likely > > picture of satn in Simha a enemy sign and in 2 malefic stars, > Makha > > and Uttara the field is open with many transits, conjunctions some > > corssing over it etc. so a bland line that it is shifted will make > > little sense, like saying Mumbai- Gorakpur passenger has arrived > on > > platform no 3..... > > > > > > > > > Tarun Chopra <occultwizard.tarun@> > > wrote: dear members > > > > > > just to share that saturn is now in leo acording to my ayanamsha > > (1-1-1155, > > > 50.2719) > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > Tarun Chopra > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2006 Report Share Posted July 16, 2006 It is Sunday -- I do not have any work! Thank god you are not my boss! RR , Bhaskar Maheswari <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Sir better spend time in studying rather than discussing endlessly on worthless issues. This shows lack of work and study. > > crystal pages <jyotish_vani wrote: This is an interesting post! > 5 horoscopes a day over say 350 days (even astrologers go on > vacation!} would mean 1750 horoscopes a year. > > There are some 5000 members here and perhaps another 2000 individuals > at other sites (not counting double and triple parked members). If > one were to assume that the remaining 100000 jyotish-seekers went to > one astrologer, it would keep him or her busy for another 55 years or > so. Now since there are probably at least one thousand astrologers > practicing jyotish, assuming equal distribution of clients, the work > coming to each individual astrologer would be over in 55*12/1000 = > approximately 20 days! Then one can go on vacation or maybe take up i- > ching! > > Maybe I am off by an order of magnitude about prospective clients, > still hardly an year's work and it is all done! > > Now, mind you, one runs into those who hop from jyotishi to jyotishi > and who I dub "astro-collectors". They continue till they find the > jyotishi who confirms in the chart what the client always knew in > his/her bones and was dying to hear! > > Let us not give up our day-jobs, folks! > > RR > > , Bhaskar Maheswari > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Sir, > > Instead of asking proof if You have been continously doing study > in Astrology > > and keeping update, then theres was no need for this question ? > > I am not here to create differences amongst people by taking > names, but the results definitely show when You use different > Ayanamshas. Results will > > only show if You take up at least 5 horoscopes in a day and check > the results > > and be honest in Your assessment . > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > dear bhaskarji > > > > you wrote: > > "Ramans ayanamsha has already been proven wrong by many stalwarts > of > > this great science" > > > > this is a news to me as me and many other astrologers are still > > using raman's ayanamsha and all astrology softwares like Parashar > > give the option of raman's ayanamsha ahead of krishnamurthy > > ayanamsha. could you furnish that PROOF and mention who are these > > stalwarts who have proved sri B.V.Raman's ayanamsha wrong. > > > > with best wishes > > pandit arjun > > > > , Bhaskar Maheswari > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > Sir, > > > That comment of Yours really was humorous and made me smile as I > > was reading it. Anyway coming to the point practioners of KP system > > are very > > > perfect in their results and god astrologers following that > > system can really > > > give the exact date of marriage too, in a few minutes. So why > > not try to use that > > > Ayanamsha and verify the subject in question ? Ramans ayanamsha > > has already been proven wrong by many stalwarts of this great > > science, and Lahiris and Kps differ just by 6 minutes, but it does > > make a difference when its on the cusp and the star Lord changes, > > then the whole results of the forecast will have a dramatic > > change.This is just a suggestion and not an advice. > > > Regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > crystal pages <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > Maybe we should all lie prostrate, pray to and ask our > > Inner Spirit > > > which planet is where, as was suggested recently!! > > > > > > <loved your railway analogy! Thanks!!> > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , Prashant Kumar G B > > > <gbp_kumar@> wrote: > > > > > > > > DEAR READERS > > > > according to ramans it is 13-10-06, Lahiri's 1-11-06. > > > > > > > > well lets see how it goes from here what we need is he likely > > > picture of satn in Simha a enemy sign and in 2 malefic stars, > > Makha > > > and Uttara the field is open with many transits, conjunctions > some > > > corssing over it etc. so a bland line that it is shifted will > make > > > little sense, like saying Mumbai- Gorakpur passenger has arrived > > on > > > platform no 3..... > > > > > > > > > > > > Tarun Chopra <occultwizard.tarun@> > > > wrote: dear members > > > > > > > > just to share that saturn is now in leo acording to my > ayanamsha > > > (1-1-1155, > > > > 50.2719) > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > Tarun Chopra > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.