Guest guest Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 Dear Members Recently there have been conersation on validity of TA. In my view, there are few possible forward a. Tarun ji validates with reasonable case studies (which he can not do for his time constrainst, per his mails on the forum...so will not work), OR b. Members validates on its own (why should they do, if Tarun ji does not want to do..so ighly unlikely that it will work), OR c. Ignore his soilcitation mails and fan mails (which most members are doing by not responding). Practising astologers on this forum (so far) has not chosen to test it and defend it. It is just being defended by the fan mails. I am sure, astrologers will prefer to see, fan mails to be collaborated with chart and events (past as well future predictions made by Tarun ji or his followers) - as Ranjan ji also expressed. Until then, these fan mails and their repeat insistence without facts are not taking it further. I, too prefer to opt either (a) or ©; but chose to write, as this is creating unnecessary conflicts on the forum. Does the moderator permit fan mails and repeat solicitation without adequate validation data? (I hope they are listening). regards / Prafulla Gang Let not the sands of time get in your lunch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 sorry for lots of typo errors. Excuse me for my quick post. regards / Prafulla Gang Let not the sands of time get in your lunch. > > jyotish (AT) inbox (DOT) com > Tue, 11 Jul 2006 04:06:16 -0800 > > ayanamsa confict on the forum (misc) > > Dear Members > > Recently there have been conersation on validity of TA. In my view, there > are few possible forward > > a. Tarun ji validates with reasonable case studies (which he can not do > for his time constrainst, per his mails on the forum...so will not work), > OR > > b. Members validates on its own (why should they do, if Tarun ji does > not want to do..so ighly unlikely that it will work), OR > > c. Ignore his soilcitation mails and fan mails (which most members are > doing by not responding). > > Practising astologers on this forum (so far) has not chosen to test it > and defend it. It is just being defended by the fan mails. I am sure, > astrologers will prefer to see, fan mails to be collaborated with chart > and events (past as well future predictions made by Tarun ji or his > followers) - as Ranjan ji also expressed. Until then, these fan mails and > their repeat insistence without facts are not taking it further. > > I, too prefer to opt either (a) or ©; but chose to write, as this is > creating unnecessary conflicts on the forum. > > Does the moderator permit fan mails and repeat solicitation without > adequate validation data? (I hope they are listening). > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > Let not the sands of time get in your lunch. __________ Free Email Notifier - Receive notifications & previews of incoming emails! Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.