RE: A controversial article on vedic astrology...[2 cents]

[Guest guest]

The just do not call it two cents!

Value of currency changes over a very short time ...

 

So why not call it just "current value" or even 'Potential Value'?

Particularly if you are the accountant/scientific type ;-)

 

ANON

 

 

, Prafulla Gang <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Make a decision! If that doesn't work, make another, and another, and

another. Keep doing this until you break through.

>

[Guest guest]

Cents or seconds, currency or time, they keep changing.

Stephen Hawking was bullish, I believe some years/time ago that soon

there will be a Theory of Everything.

Today, He suggests, that there may not be a Theory of Everything and

lives with it comfortably.

Thousands of astrologers spread all over India give reasonably

accurate predictions either without bothering about ayanamsha or

taking different ayanamshas.

Changing situations change potentials and values, even that of time.

Calendars,distances all change their units too.

So, Jyotish can grow and thrive with different ayanamshas.

regards

 

rishi

 

 

 

, "crystal pages"

<jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> The just do not call it two cents!

> Value of currency changes over a very short time ...

>

> So why not call it just "current value" or even 'Potential Value'?

> Particularly if you are the accountant/scientific type ;-)

>

> ANON

>

>

> , Prafulla Gang <jyotish@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Make a decision! If that doesn't work, make another, and another,

and

> another. Keep doing this until you break through.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Prafullaji,

So far we do not even know that the "words" attributed to Parasara or

Varahmihira are actually theirs or have slipped in those treatises

sometime over the past centuries.

Interestingly, there is only one astrological book, I have come

across so far ( my readings , I must admit very basic) which has been

printed in the nineteenth century and the author admits that the

words are his own.

In this book the author gives a different method of calculating

ayanamsa and takes it roughly as 55 seconds/year.

regards

rishi

 

 

 

, Prafulla Gang <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Ranjan ji

>

> There are many controversies in jyotish like in any subject. and it

is real heart breaking to feel that, prediction does not warrant

correct chart...and even if the chart is wrong, we can still proceed.

>

> Most of ayanamsa definition and their reasonings (research papers

etc), still does not answer the basic question - the ayanamsa (or

planetary calculation basis) used by ancient sages including

Parashar, Varah Mihir etc.

>

> BTW, I did not add "2 cents" in the thread. I am rather devil's

advocate - partly out of my inquisitiveness and partly out of

ignorance. Ironically, it is difficult to believe / digest (if at

all !!) that, all these years - we were reading / predicting from

wrong chart.

>

> regards / Prafulla Gang

>

> Make a decision! If that doesn't work, make another, and another,

and another. Keep doing this until you break through.

>

>

> >

> > jyotish_vani

> > Sat, 08 Jul 2006 02:33:08 -0000

> >

> > Re: RE: A controversial article on vedic

astrology...[2

> > cents]

> >

> > The just do not call it two cents!

> > Value of currency changes over a very short time ...

> >

> > So why not call it just "current value" or even 'Potential Value'?

> > Particularly if you are the accountant/scientific type ;-)

> >

> > ANON

> >

> >

> > , Prafulla Gang <jyotish@>

> > wrote:

> >>

> >> Make a decision! If that doesn't work, make another, and

another, and

> > another. Keep doing this until you break through.

> >>

>