Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Diamonds and MritSanjeevani of Shukracharya, Pandit...

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||

 

Namaste Arjun Ji and Aalok ji,

 

If my entry is unwarranted, I sincerely apologize. Since the thread is on

gems, I couldn't help but intervene. :)

 

To say that most of the gem dealers sell Moassanite or Natual Zirconia or

Czs in lieu of diamonds is a unfair allegations. Also, there is no distinction

between a good or a bad GIA cert. However, certs also cannot be absolute

barometer since GIA grading will be different from IGI or EGL and even GIA New

York will have a slightly different grading than GIA Antwerp. I hope I am making

myself clear.

 

Now, most of the world population who Does wear diamonds wear less than 100%

pure ( IF, D, 0 florescence) material simply because of price. Does that

mean everyone else who does wear the "relatively" inferior quality "genuine"

product have no effects? or simply placebo effects?

 

Further, to the rest of the population who wear substitutes like white topaz

or CZs are just comforting their minds with a placebo? Does any 1 of them

experience real positive results ? How much role does karma play?

 

Please give some thoughts to these, and if there be, I will write more with

references.

 

Namaste;

Gaurav Jain

 

In a message dated 7/6/2006 6:38:01 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,

osho_shadow writes:

 

Dear Arjun Ji,

 

Calling a sacred scripture absurd, unrealistic is

almost very rude. Secondly you needed a proof which i

gave you.

 

You are saying that crores of woman across the globe

wear diamonds. It is interesting and i would like to

know how many of them were of the right size ?. How

many of them were tested by Labs like G.I.A and other

proper labs ?. None.

 

You will be shocked that most of the suppliers provide

false certifiates for stones. Most of them sell

Mazonite instead of diamonds ( It is a bad thing, but

a fact). Only a few can give you good certificates

from GIA. Even if one gives you certifiate you cannot

say that diamond was the cause of male progeny.

Diamonds with proper size effect you while Jewelry

embedded diamonds are smaller and cannot be detected

for clarity ( They need very high power lenses).

 

 

If i add things above your count will come down to

nothing. So dear Sir, do not blame Shastras for

something.

 

I gave you reasons for what i said. You do not want to

accept them, it is fine. You have your views. No

problems. But you cannot enslave my thinking or my

views.

 

I know you will never understand.

 

Best Regards,

 

A.J

 

 

--- panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 > wrote:

 

> dear alok ji

>

> please remove any of such feelings like enemies as i

> love all human

> beings equally. all members in all groups are aware

> that i dont know

> sarcasm and write simple straight language.

>

> please do not delete the messages to which you

> respond a mail, so

> that the readers will know what was asked and what

> is written. this

> is the practice which all members follow.

>

> coming back to my mail, i asked you to corroborate

> your four bold

> statements viz. (pasted from my previous mail)

>

> 1. vedic astrology prohibits ladies from wearing a

> diamond.

> 2. diamond creates problems with mensturations for

> ladies.

> 3. ladies who want male child shall not wear a

> diamond.

> 4. however, a clear flawless diamond can be worn by

> ladies.

>

> point four is known to all and hence we need not

> shed more light on

> it. but then it contradicts your first statement.

> please clarify.

> the garuda puran have not said in its lone sholka on

> stones, that

> they are meant only for men and not women. no

> gender bias was shown

> for that matter in any classic.

>

> you have still not answered how you came to a

> conclusion that vedic

> astrology prohibits ladies from wearing a diamond

> and also warned

> the ladies who wear diamonds to have menstruation

> problems. this ia

> very bold and sweeping statmenet which is not true.

> there are no

> such rules in the vedic samhitas or vedic shastras.

> crores of women

> across the globe wear a diamond ring in their

> engagement itself,

> diamonds in their earrings or earlobes and also

> diamonds in their

> nosepins. i have seen crores of such women getting

> male children.

>

> as regards some book mentioned by you which says

> that a woman who

> wish to have male child shall not wear a diamond is

> absurd,

> unrealistic, false, irrational and illogical and not

> witnessed by

> crores of women. hence please do not publicicse

> such generalised

> statements which are far from truth.

>

> if you wish to respect the subject and respect the

> facts, i can

> furnish you hundreds of charts of women wearing

> diamonds having no

> problems as such.

>

> lastly, in academic debates, facts overweigh

> personalities. if any

> one says something which is untrue, it will not be

> accepted. please

> do keep sharing your knowledge which is based on

> facts and logic,

> for "yukti yuktam vako grahyam baladapi sukadapi".

>

> with best wishes

> pandit arjun

>

> vedic astrology, ALOK JAGAWAT

>

> <osho_shadow wrote:

> >

> > Dear Arjun Ji,

> >

> > I am sure I am not your enemy because this is the

> > second time I am facing a sarcastic opposition

> from

> > your side. I hardly know you and so do you.

> >

> > Well I will answer and back up my statements.

> >

> > Chapter 2, Sloka 17 ( Rajnirghant)

> >

> > Vajram Na Kinchidapi Dharyativyameke,

> > Putrarthinibhirbalabhirushanti Tajagya:

> > Shringatkatriputdhanyakavat sthitam ya,

> > chashronibham cha shubhadam Tanyarthininam"

> >

> > This statement clearly states that a lady who

> wishes a

> > male child should avoid diamonds. Now when I said

> > flawless I meant something else. Flawless diamonds

> can

> > cast a CEO a two months salary and a bigger piece

> can

> > cost a fortune so I was not sure what it can give

> you.

> > That is why I remarked that in case of flawless

> > diamonds case can be different.

> >

> > Dear Arjun ji I respect astrologers and instead of

> > seeking and finding mistakes in others we should

> share

> > our knowledge with each other. I do not want to

> pursue

> > this matter further.

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > A.J

> >

> >

> >

> > Do You ?

> > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> protection around

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

Do You ?

Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around

 

 

 

Archives: vedic astrology

 

Group info: vedic astrology/info.html

 

To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

........ May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

 

|| Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...