Ascent of the anti-Hindus: Sandhya Jain

[Guest guest]

Ascent of the anti-Hindus: Sandhya Jain

Posted by: "aryaputra_1927" aryaputra_1927

aryaputra_1927

Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:45 pm (PST)

Ascent of the anti-Hindus

 

Sandhya Jain

 

Barely a month after his visit to New Delhi for support in

rebuilding

his Maoist-ravaged country, Nepal's appointed interim Prime Minister

GP Koirala has delivered his unhappy nation into the hands of its

worst tormentor and retired to a hospital bed. Whispers from

Kathmandu suggest that Prachanda, would-be President-King of the

former Hindu kingdom, is a Christian. There is little reason to

doubt

these voices, as similar murmurings about LTTE supremo V Prabhakaran

proved correct, and Sri Lanka's Tamil Hindus admit that the

organisation does not serve their political, economic or cultural

interests in any way. Its objective is to provide its covert Western

backers a foothold in the region.

 

With Prachanda's ascent in India's hinterland, the West has executed

a far greater coup than the secession of East Timor from Indonesia.

If South Block is unmoved, it is only because an Italian Roman

Catholic has successfully subverted the national ethos and

subjugated

the country to American geo-strategic interests. It is truly

shocking

that New Delhi has refused to react to the fact that an aged

politician, appointed for an interim period in the wake of a popular

agitation, has inaugurated the most audacious changes in Nepal's

polity without any mandate from the Nepali people.

 

Instead of supporting Hindu Nepal, its civilisational ally, the

Sonia

Gandhi-dominated UPA regime is shamelessly working to accomplish the

West-sponsored Maoist agenda. The centuries-old Hindu character of

the country has been tossed aside, and the monarchy and the Royal

Nepal Army which symbolise the nation discredited. Though the

supposedly popular uprising (the cognoscenti say the streets were

crammed with paid lumpens) aimed at electing a government and

restoring the democratic process, it now transpires that Nepal is

going to be subverted through a new constituent assembly, which was

never on the people's agenda.

 

It is true that King Gyanendra is not respected like his late

brother. Yet realisation is beginning to dawn in some quarters that

the political parties that constituted Nepal's fractious democratic

process have been rendered completely irrelevant by plans for a new

constituent assembly. This is because the Seven Party Alliance (SPA)

regime is being blackmailed by Maoist threats of renewed violence

and

bloodshed, and this threat may impact upon the results whenever

elections are held. Prachanda, dreaming of the Nepali version of the

Imperial Presidency, is advocating United Nations supervision of the

polls, when everyone knows that the UN is an agent of the West,

especially under Kofi Annan.

 

America is seeking to enthrone Christian stooges wherever it has

strategic interests. Ideology is a ruse, mere washable distemper.

This will become apparent when the new constitution officially

abolishes the Hindu nature of the State and espouses minority

rights,

despite the fact that there were no minorities in Nepal until the

West and the ISI jointly evangelised the region as part of a policy

of containing India. Nepal's new constitution will offer freedom of

religion (sic), a euphemism for the freedom to convert Nepalis to

Christianity.

 

Eradication of the Hindu character of Nepal is the sole raison

d'etre

for the present de facto regime change, and its instigators are the

American-led West, operating through anti-Hindu communist groups in

both India and Nepal. Notwithstanding their pretended anti-

imperialist rhetoric, there should be no misunderstanding that

Communists serve any power other than the West. Russia is officially

non-Communist and China is Communist in name only. Left radicals

enjoy untold luxury and wealth solely in America, populating its

elite universities and NGOs. They are Christian America's natural

allies in hurting the native civilisational ethos in non-Christian

countries targetted by the West, and are doing a thorough job in

Nepal.

 

The great Pashupatinath mandir, as critical to Nepal's cultural

traditions as India's Vishwanath temple at Varanasi, has been

singled

out for secular assault. It has been asked to submit its accounts

for

scrutiny by unelected unbelievers. This is an outrage, an act of

iconoclasm as grave as the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas by the

American-trained Taliban. If Nepalis fail to respond to this insult

with the ferocity it deserves, they should be prepared to witness

the

cross replacing the shikar over the sanctum sanctorum.

 

Prachanda has made several revealing statements. Last year, he told

Time magazine that when he launched the so-called people's war in

1996, he did not have a single modern weapon or any trained armed

cadres (April 18, 2005). Anybody who has observed the insurgency in

India's North-East would readily identify the religious affiliations

of the international sponsors of such 'people's movements.'

 

More importantly, Prachanda is determined to keep his arms and armed

cadres intact even after elections to the proposed constituent

assembly are over. This is obviously to secure an advantage (sic)

which the elections might deny him. He could then emulate Lenin and

enact a Winter Palace-style of coup against the country's effete

politicians, who have so far behaved with sheep-like stupidity. This

has emboldened him to suggest that his Maoist insurgents could join

and take over the Royal Nepal Army (RNA)!

 

Ms Sonia Gandhi's supremacy having ensured an unfriendly India, it

is

not known what kind of cards the King and Army still retain to

defeat

this virtual colonisation of Nepal. But it is almost certain that

they cannot beat back this challenge alone. Nepal's notoriously

divisive political parties have not shown any awareness of the

nature

of the threat facing the nation, so it is too early to say if they

can unite with the King and Army for a larger purpose. If Prachanda

formally seizes all power in Nepal, there is little doubt that

America will seek bases on Nepali soil, in order to 'contain' China.

This does not augur well for India. Yet we must prepare for this

eventuality, as there is no other reason to plant a Christian in

Kathmandu.

 

The 21st century seems set to witness a major geographical

realignment with old national boundaries being merged into larger

conglomerates. America already calls the shots in Pakistan and

through it, in Bangladesh. It has bases in Afghanistan, and Tibetan

leader, the Dalai Lama, has been cultivated and controlled through a

Hollywood star. Christian supremos have been put in place in India

and Nepal, while Christian protégés are being promoted in Sri Lanka

and Myanmar. That gives you a new political entity already

christened

by the US State Department - South Asia. Not a nice thought; not one

that can be readily dismissed either.

 

http://www.dailypioneer.com/indexn12.asp?

main_variable=EDITS&file_name=edit3%2Etxt&counter_img=3