The individuality of Jyotish(i)....Mine coming soon.

[Guest guest]

Dear R R ji,

 

Well....not all jyotishis are same natured.

For a loooooong time, scores of curious learners and

experienced jyotishis have been asking me to reveal my

Rahu Centric approach formulated, codified and proven

to a grat extent by me.

 

My most learned friend Guru Ramdas ji first proved

efficacy of my Rahu Centric HP Theory about two years

ago and now his worthy shishya Chi. Raghunath Rao

Nemani took upon himself to use my codes, expand and

apply to charts and has almost completed a paper of

about 65 pages . A new form of Dasa system which I

recently formed and tried on some charts also may find

place in his paper.

Very soon all will be able to read his marathon work.

Interested people will be able to utilise the simplest

technique so far formulated, in their analysis(if they

are not afraid of Rahu).

 

Ofcourse, there will be a lot of doubts, questions

etc. I will try and answer to the best possible extent

I can . This is because I am plagued by ill health.

And also working at odd hours.

 

Yes, approaching a chart for me is like trying to read

the mind and heart of a pretty girl.

Her eyes say something,

Her heart says something, She means something and she

speaks something.

Pretty difficult job No?

 

Tatvam-Asi

 

 

 

 

--- crystal pages <jyotish_vani (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

> I have always been curious about the jyotishi and

> the jyotish process

> as much as the technical jyotish. Since there are

> many experienced

> practitioners and advanced students on this forum,

> and most willing

> to share, I hope some would not mind sharing their

> approach in

> general or specific details how they approach a

> reading, internet or

> otherwise and if there are big differences in the

> two types of

> readings or approaches those would be instructive.

>

> Now I realize that some may be a bit sensitive about

> telling their

> specific techniques and certain procedures. We only

> want to know what

> you are absolutely comfortable in telling us all.

>

> It is quite possible that we do not use the same

> approach each time,

> afterall some of us are traditional and conservative

> while others are

> not and there is really no right or wrong way to do

> things, so please

> do not be shy.

>

> I am sure that beginners and reading seekers would

> appreciate knowing

> the process used by their jyotishis and what the

> jyotishis can share.

> Again, this is not expected to be more than a

> general approach in

> most cases, though there may be some intrepid ones

> who would share

> more than others. This reflects just a style and by

> itself is not

> associated with the quality of a reading or

> accuracy. I say that

> because I may be encroaching upon a very sensitive

> region and not

> everyone will be comfortable sharing.

>

> Maybe the beginners can lead us and share their

> approaches and

> perhaps set an example to follow!

>

> RR

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

I must respectfully but rigidly insist, Sir that you should always

use the mandatory square brackets around the category keywords! ;-)

 

Wow, that sounds like a serious product indeed! We all await its

arrival.

 

Dada, MA in all her 'roopas' and ages and appearances can be

inscrutible, unfathomable etc -- but yet so right there once the

artificial fences can be overcome and ignored and the child then runs

to Her with full trust knowing that She will reciprocate! Does She

have any other choice?

 

RR

 

, Tatvamasi <om_tatsat_om

wrote:

>

> Dear R R ji,

>

> Well....not all jyotishis are same natured.

> For a loooooong time, scores of curious learners and

> experienced jyotishis have been asking me to reveal my

> Rahu Centric approach formulated, codified and proven

> to a grat extent by me.

>

> My most learned friend Guru Ramdas ji first proved

> efficacy of my Rahu Centric HP Theory about two years

> ago and now his worthy shishya Chi. Raghunath Rao

> Nemani took upon himself to use my codes, expand and

> apply to charts and has almost completed a paper of

> about 65 pages . A new form of Dasa system which I

> recently formed and tried on some charts also may find

> place in his paper.

> Very soon all will be able to read his marathon work.

> Interested people will be able to utilise the simplest

> technique so far formulated, in their analysis(if they

> are not afraid of Rahu).

>

> Ofcourse, there will be a lot of doubts, questions

> etc. I will try and answer to the best possible extent

> I can . This is because I am plagued by ill health.

> And also working at odd hours.

>

> Yes, approaching a chart for me is like trying to read

> the mind and heart of a pretty girl.

> Her eyes say something,

> Her heart says something, She means something and she

> speaks something.

> Pretty difficult job No?

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

>

>

>

> --- crystal pages <jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> > I have always been curious about the jyotishi and

> > the jyotish process

> > as much as the technical jyotish. Since there are

> > many experienced

> > practitioners and advanced students on this forum,

> > and most willing

> > to share, I hope some would not mind sharing their

> > approach in

> > general or specific details how they approach a

> > reading, internet or

> > otherwise and if there are big differences in the

> > two types of

> > readings or approaches those would be instructive.

> >

> > Now I realize that some may be a bit sensitive about

> > telling their

> > specific techniques and certain procedures. We only

> > want to know what

> > you are absolutely comfortable in telling us all.

> >

> > It is quite possible that we do not use the same

> > approach each time,

> > afterall some of us are traditional and conservative

> > while others are

> > not and there is really no right or wrong way to do

> > things, so please

> > do not be shy.

> >

> > I am sure that beginners and reading seekers would

> > appreciate knowing

> > the process used by their jyotishis and what the

> > jyotishis can share.

> > Again, this is not expected to be more than a

> > general approach in

> > most cases, though there may be some intrepid ones

> > who would share

> > more than others. This reflects just a style and by

> > itself is not

> > associated with the quality of a reading or

> > accuracy. I say that

> > because I may be encroaching upon a very sensitive

> > region and not

> > everyone will be comfortable sharing.

> >

> > Maybe the beginners can lead us and share their

> > approaches and

> > perhaps set an example to follow!

> >

> > RR

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>