Healthy Discussions

[Guest guest]

Dear Wendy,

 

I think both of us are on agreement here :-). Yes, I

was not clear and hence I brought up the topic to see

if I could get the clarity from others.

 

Regards,

Krishna

 

--- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote:

 

> Dear Krishna,

>

> //Yes and No. It depends on what one is trying to

> say.

> For example, in my other post on "Bhadakesh" and

> "Yogakaraka", I was definitely not clear and I was

> trying to see if anyone else has thought about it or

> worked on it. Hence, I brought up the topic.//

>

> I think you're splitting hairs here Krishna! In the

> topic "Bhadakesh

> and YogaKaraka", you were quite clear in your mind

> that you didn't

> know how to reconcile Bhadakesh with YogaKaraka.

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

> http://JyotishVidya.com

> ______________________________

>

> -

> "Krishnamurthy Seetharama"

> <krishna_1998 >

> <jyotish-vidya>

> Sunday, June 25, 2006 2:58 PM

> Re: Invasive Breast Cancer

>

>

> Dear Wendy,

>

> //The Sripathy Bhava Chart is NOT the Janma Kundali!

> It is a separate chart taken from the main

> horoscope.

> I trust you recognise the difference...//

>

> Yes, Sripathy Bhava chart is not Janma Kunadli, no

> doubt. What I said was that when I use Sripathy

> Bhava

> chart instead of Janma Kunadali in my longevity

> calculations, I get better results than using Janma

> Kundli itself.

>

> //Discussion is healthy. However it's probably wise

> to

> have the facts clear in our mind before we bring up

> a

> topic, don't you agree? //

>

> Yes and No. It depends on what one is trying to say.

> For example, in my other post on "Bhadakesh" and

> "Yogakaraka", I was definitely not clear and I was

> trying to see if anyone else has thought about it or

> worked on it. Hence, I brought up the topic.

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

>

>