Conjunction in Navamsha/Verna ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Verna ji

 

Thanks for your kind words.

My logic has no high importance.Varahamihira did speak about kalatra

matters based on planets having amsha in the 7th from lagna.

Late Santhanam clearly spoke about impossibility of aspects in

vargamshas.Late D.V.SubbuRao had similar understandings.Most

importantly we do not have a single shloka to support.Anyone who

approaches jyotish as a student,no matter how high is their reputation

,will understand this.

 

Kind Regds

Pradeep

, "vernalagnia" <vernalagnia

wrote:

>

> , "vijayadas_pradeep"

> <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Hari Namaste

> >

> > Take planets Mercury/Mars/Jupiter -placed in the first degree of

> > Aries,Mars/Sag respectively.They are physically,(OK lets say

> > relative/apparent) present within the boundaries of

> > Aries/Leo/Sag.Distance between Mars/Mercury is 120 degrees and

> > Mars/Jupiter is 240 degrees(Physical seperation).(Apparent need not

> > be a concern as ,we follow the SAME benchmark(w.r to earth) for all

> > Rashi Chakra placements).

> >

> > Now let us take Navamsha.All the three are drawn as conjunct in

> > Aries.Do you think it is an apparent conjunction as above?.Then what

> > is navamsha?First 3.2 degrees of any FIRY sign is always assigned to

> > Aries.Any planet placed within this degree span will relate to Aries

> > as navamsha.This is a tattwa based sambandha and does not represent

> > any placement.On the other hand Rashi chakra placement is an

> > astronomically measured value,adjusted for ayanamsha

> > correction.Distance/Conjunction in Rashi chakra -points towards

> > physical seperation/proximity while navamsha points towards

> > sambandhas.It has no connection with distance.Hope the difference is

> > clear this time.

>

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> Your exegesis contains lots of germane points and is hard to logically

> argue against. Excellent!

>

> +++

>

> PS: Where did this thread emanate from?

>