Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 Trust me Ketan, Combination as below you showed is the best according to my research. Even all sidh malas are also made using this combination. Thanks Asheesh , yourstruelyprince <no_reply wrote: > > > oh master, > may be I put a wrong combination. > you mean like this ? > 2 mukhi. ! ! .3 mukhi > 2 mukhi. i i .3 mukhi > 4 mukhi. ! ! .5 mukhi > 4 Mukhi. i i .5 Mukhi > 6 mukhi. ! ! .7 mukhi > 6 mukhi. i i .7 mukhi > 8 mukhi. ! ! .9 mukhi > 10 mukhi. i i .11 mukhi > 12 mukhi. ! ! .13 mukhi > .Gauri Shankar. > see you, Prince. > > same mukhi beads, strung mouth part to mouth part, and the tail of 2 > mukhi touches the tail of 4 mukhi. Then again 4 mukhi mouth to 4 mukhi > mouth. And so on. Did you mean like this? > see you, Ketan. > > > > > > , AumShiningLotus@ > wrote: > > > > Dear Friends > > > > Found a reference in the SriMadDeviBhagavat that states to string > for Mantra > > Siddhi the beads are to be strung mouth part to mouth part and tail > part to > > tail part.........meaning they knew at the time the best usage was > in pairs > > > > hope this helps > > > > DD > > > > In a message dated 6/13/2006 5:37:02 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > asheesh1968@ writes: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Prince > > > > > > Thanks for sending me the design. Lot of people say that a mala > > > should be prepared in a pair. > > > > > > Is there some one who can give more insight into the best possible > > > design of mala. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Asheesh > > > > > > , yourstruelyprince > > > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > >Hi Asheesh, Look at the design. It should be like this according > > > to... > > > >all people around. ))) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.