Ayanamsa issues - and more ...!

[Guest guest]

Dear Prafulla,

 

When I learned jyotish the first thing that I got hit with was the

variety of ayanamshas and the claims that followed soon thereafter!

Then came the dashas, nakshatra and rashi dashas. I being an

individual of rather modest means (intellectually speaking) I can

just adore amazingly at individuals who master so many dashas and

techniques and hop from one to another fluidly and describe the

charts and nativities. Nearly all articles that we read describe so

many charts within each expose' and devoting barely a few lines to

each. There is so much to talk about and describe. I can sense their

excitement but at the same time also the confusion in their readers!

 

Quite frankly, one who is into astrology more or less 'swanta

sukhkhaay' has to be rather modest these days and expect and accept

modest gains, modest success because for most astrology students and

practitioners, it is never really going to be 100% or even close! Is

that because technique is lacking or is it because that is the nature

of the beast? The human beast, let loose by its progenitor, God -- to

wander in the Garden of Eden, where allegorically it was approached

by the Serpant that was named devil by some but knowledge and free-

will by others! The allegory did say that one bite of the apple of

wisdom and eve was not eve any more!

 

Serpant, rahu, ketu, wisdom, free-will -- let us just leave it there,

untouched,unsaid.

 

Given the uncertain birthtimes, defective memories and a variety of

other uncertain unknowns, leave it to a pragmatic and bright

individual like you to figure out the best path, and reduce

confusion, as very aptly described in your messages.

 

It is wise to not put all eggs in the same basket, such as dashas and

subperiods, but to take a 3 dimensional or even multidimensional look

at reality -- dashas, transits and so on.

 

RR

 

 

 

 

, Prafulla Gang <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Members

>

> Each one of us have set our faith on different ayanamsa, and have

experienced success with its application (read with dasha variations

and year duration).

>

> Dasha has always been very ambigious issue for me (various dashas

working; often overriding in terms of events and so on). I, at some

stage, started pursuing transits (rashi chart as well D charts) as

initial factor, dasha as secondary factor - and have most of the

time, identified that planets in transit will always coincide

(associate - conjunction, relate with natal one etc) mutually, if

they have relationship in dasha (I am referring to vimshottari only)

and when they associate first, very often, will be the correct

begining point of that sub period. I used this for rectification of

chart or adjusting of dasha (for begining period). and if such

corelation exists, then only the event will materialize.

>

> List members might also have exprienced such relationship between

main dasha / sub period. I rarely venture into sub sub period, as I

somehow, feel much more comfortable with transit (read with on D

charts as well) than dasha.

>

> regards / Prafulla Gang

>

> " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey,

but only two to make a monkey out of man "

>