Guest guest Posted June 4, 2006 Report Share Posted June 4, 2006 There is something I don't often get from Jyotish books or lessons on interpretation: the order of operations, the linguistics of Jyotish. In case these terms are not very accurate or descriptive of what confounds me I will use an example. Often times it seems students are prompted to see "confluence" when learning to parse factors from a natal chart and integrate these into an interpretation. Interpetation is a creative act, not just creative in the sense of an art requiring skill and tact, but also in that the Jyotishi is making a story out of a collection of planetary/ astronomical facts. He is participating with the creative aspect of Nature. When discussing a matter with a client, say partners, he or she must look at the 7th House, any tenants of the house, the ruler of the house, the natural significator of the house, and any planets aspecting any of these. He must also look at these from the Moon and perhaps from the Sun, and maybe see the 7th from the significators and in the Navamsa. It seems like some teachers encourage collecting all of this data in piles and then putting like with like. Now this seems like it would be mostly satisfactory for simple cases, but I feel like the method delivery is important as the punchline if you want to really get at the grain of the chart. How to determine what is Apples and what is Oranges? What is in parentheses and therefore interpreted first and what comes last. What is communcative and what is transitive? What is the direct object? I took a class with a teacher who did address this in which the student was urged to look at strengths of each planet first but perhaps this begs the same question. She also emphasized the Lagna as the anchor, the aperture, the point of usage for the chart. What I am wondering is are there any Jyotishi, perhaps those working on the research end, who can address this question of order of operations beyond that answer every astrologer has a "style." Interpretation seems to be about reading the language of the planets. Anthropomorhpic and myths are one level and help get at the meaning of Sun in 4th in Aquarius, but what of weaving that with the whole of the chart? What is the best flow chart for the sentences, the best yantra that can yield the "one taste." What reading of ruler of 10th in 4th best decides the way the ball will fall in this game of plinko, between interpreting it as "working from home" or "working in real estate." This may not be as articulate as I want it, but I welcome follow-up posts. Thanks! David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2006 Report Share Posted June 4, 2006 David Engisch wrote: >I took a class with a teacher who did address this in which the >student was urged to look at strengths of each planet first but >perhaps this begs the same question. > Hi David, I agree, that it does in fact "beg the same question" and therefore any 'system' regardless of how perfectly structured, logical or orderly may still leave you holding the same bag of "apples and oranges". The word I use is "synthesis," and I remember asking this exact question of a teacher about 30 years ago--how to see the chart in a holistic way. His answer to me was to read about 2000 charts and then I might find out. This actually worked for me--but perhaps it is not the way for everyone. I would say that our approach to a chart should be as unique and varied as we are individuals--meaning that if one is a very orderly and analytical Mercury/Saturn type then his most natural approach should be with very exact rules ( the order of which are by his design and to his liking). And if one is a Lunar or Neptunian type, then following one's intuition is a good way to approach it. I now advise students to find the first thing in the chart that grabs their attention and go from there-following their respective natural inclinations. It might be a stellium of planets in the 11th house, an exact Jupiter conjunction to the MC or a Moon/Rahu configuration in the 12th house. In my opinion, reading a chart is similar to meeting a person for the first time--something about them will focus your attention to a specific area--perhaps their particular gait, a hand gesture, a certain air of confidence or insecurity etc. That initial 'meeting' or focus of attention will serve as a key to unlock the entire personality just as it will serve to guide you through the rest of the chart. I find that there is a definite cohesion and interconnectedness in the chart and therefore answers to questions like "lord of 10 in 4" may be found by looking elsewhere in the chart. If for instance the chart shows a very strong social life by way of an active and well placed Moon, Venus and Jupiter and "working at home" requires many hours spent in isolation, then I may veer away from this as a possible answer. Best, Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2006 Report Share Posted June 4, 2006 Dear David and all, One should focus on getting a personaliy picture first, from a horoscope. Then the actions and exact implications of the actions can be judged easily. For example, an individual has mars in capricorn in lagna, saturn in third in pisces and tenth lord venus in tenth itself in libra. Now, a picture comes out that the person is physically strongly built, has a tendency to go for valourous acts, exercises and keeps fit but is very disciplined and comfortable with the implementation of his actions. On the other hand, if mars in capricorn is in lagna, but saturn is in sixth and venus in twelfth, then his same physical strength will be devoted not towards valourous acts but to satisfy his competitive spirits and to defeat his self-created enemies. There is a distinct difference between valour and competition with rivals. He will lack discipline, both physical and psychological. Valour involves positive and helpfull intentions, like a person entering a burning house to save someone. Whereas competition is something selfish and to much extent more negative than valour. His actions will also not be directed towards right goals always and he will waste his energies in wronfgull and unnecessary pursuits. Legal problems and health will always drain his energies of mars. I may not have been able to put in the correct words, but the concepts should be slightly clearer now. About Mary's question of advising one to bring changes in behaviour, it is always tried by the astrologers, but the truth remains that behaviour and thinking cannot be changed easily unless and untill the planetary transits and dashas support the change. Regards, Ashutosh - David Engisch valist Sunday, 04 June, 2006 06:00 Along the Lines of the Personal Behavior posts: order of operations There is something I don't often get from Jyotish books or lessons on interpretation: the order of operations, the linguistics of Jyotish. In case these terms are not very accurate or descriptive of what confounds me I will use an example. Often times it seems students are prompted to see "confluence" when learning to parse factors from a natal chart and integrate these into an interpretation. Interpetation is a creative act, not just creative in the sense of an art requiring skill and tact, but also in that the Jyotishi is making a story out of a collection of planetary/ astronomical facts. He is participating with the creative aspect of Nature. When discussing a matter with a client, say partners, he or she must look at the 7th House, any tenants of the house, the ruler of the house, the natural significator of the house, and any planets aspecting any of these. He must also look at these from the Moon and perhaps from the Sun, and maybe see the 7th from the significators and in the Navamsa. It seems like some teachers encourage collecting all of this data in piles and then putting like with like. Now this seems like it would be mostly satisfactory for simple cases, but I feel like the method delivery is important as the punchline if you want to really get at the grain of the chart. How to determine what is Apples and what is Oranges? What is in parentheses and therefore interpreted first and what comes last. What is communcative and what is transitive? What is the direct object? I took a class with a teacher who did address this in which the student was urged to look at strengths of each planet first but perhaps this begs the same question. She also emphasized the Lagna as the anchor, the aperture, the point of usage for the chart. What I am wondering is are there any Jyotishi, perhaps those working on the research end, who can address this question of order of operations beyond that answer every astrologer has a "style." Interpretation seems to be about reading the language of the planets. Anthropomorhpic and myths are one level and help get at the meaning of Sun in 4th in Aquarius, but what of weaving that with the whole of the chart? What is the best flow chart for the sentences, the best yantra that can yield the "one taste." What reading of ruler of 10th in 4th best decides the way the ball will fall in this game of plinko, between interpreting it as "working from home" or "working in real estate." This may not be as articulate as I want it, but I welcome follow-up posts. Thanks! David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.