Guest guest Posted June 3, 2006 Report Share Posted June 3, 2006 Dear RR ji and Ashutoshji, I second both your opinions. Aynamsha is something like your Aorta. You can have a bypass but you cannot fiddle with your Aorta. All our Jyotish principles depend heavily on time proven Ayanamsha Value (albeit there is a small difference between Lahiri, Raman, etc) but mota moti all have proven their worth. As Ashutoshji put it rightly about transits, there cannot be a "unlearn all " and Newly learn All thing. Since with any drastc change as in recently proposed value by a member, everything will change .Now how am I going to justify my 57 years of life's happenings according to established tenets in new environment? As RR ji put it, we are dealing with a major major major subject and it needs a lot of experimentation/discussion/proving before we can even think of using it . RRji is wedded to Astrology, Ashutoshji is living astrology and I am Pujafying astrology. Mujhe Tum se kuchha bhi na chhahiye, Mujhe mere Ayanamsh se jod do (2) Tatvam-Asi crystal pages <rrgb (AT) sprint (DOT) ca> wrote: Dear Ashutoshji, Absolutely! I was not recommending that one should fiddle around with ayanamsha on a whim. Particularly if ayanamsha is the only factor one is experimenting with (and experimenting should only be done in a study/amateur/hobby setting and not in a professional setting or where -Asia serious reading is concerned, because it could mislead to both the client and astrologer). Having said that, ayanamsha also interacts with other factors such as parallax correction for moon, and the duration of the dasha year etc. The interplay is complex and again it should not be dabbled into carelessly. RR , "astrologerashutosh" <astrologerashutosh> wrote: > > Dear Rohini Ji, > > I truly understand and accept what you said. > > But, A change in practiced ayanamsa can influence so many factors. like the dashas, the transits, the basic planetary positions and also the numerous concepts of astrology which one has developed and discovered after practical experiences in reading horoscopes. > > In planetary calculations where even true or mean rahu calculations can make a lot of differences in the personality analysis and predictions of the native, a change in ayanamsa cannot be done so randomly. > > It is easier for those who are still in basic learning process, but for a person like me who studies daily and hourly transits, it is not. > > It is really like a marriage for me. I am not a rigid orthodox astrologer, but any new ayanamsa should prove to be logical and better than the already practised one. > > I am not married to astrology, but I live it. It is a way of life for me and my only guide and teacher. > > Regards, > > Ashutosh > > > > > - > crystal pages > > Saturday, 03 June, 2006 12:33 > Re: before Lahiri which one? 2/6 p2 > > > Dear Ashutoshji, > > I must be honest! For me it is a lifelong marriage with jyotish! > > Ayanamsha is a mutual agreement and not a lifelong contract that is a > make or break in *my* marriage! > > I am just being very honest and candid! > > I hope you can understand and accept that > > Warmest regards, > > Rohiniranjan > > > > , "astrologerashutosh" > <astrologerashutosh@> wrote: > > > > Dear Rohini Ji, > > > > Very wise words. I too believe in a sincere > marriage. Once the partner-search and match-makings are over, one > should be devoted to the chosen partner (ayanamsa) only. Thanks!! > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Ashutosh > > > > > > - > > crystal pages > > > > Saturday, 03 June, 2006 12:07 > > Re: before Lahiri which one? 2/6 p2 > > > > > > Dear Ashutosh ji > > > > I have stopped arguing about ayanamsha around 1975, which > according > > to Mr. Tarun Chopra (who expressedly is obviously confused and > still > > wondering about my gender!) was when I was 3 years old! > > > > That is unreal, of course but I would not waste the time of an > astute > > pragmatist and a real practical astrologer like you with that :-P > > > > I have nothing against any ayanamsha really -- let me just say > this: > > Being with an ayanamsha is like a sincere marriage and even when > > there are divorces for reasons other than hate, or loss of love, > one > > feels differently about marriages and divorces as opposed to > those > > who part in anger! I belong to the former group described!! > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , "astrologerashutosh" > > <astrologerashutosh@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rohini Ji, > > > > > > The earth's tilt on its axis, the Ayana, > is > > the real factor behind the ayanamsa. Ayanamsa is the difference > > between sayan (with ayan) and nirayan (without ayana) planetary > > calculations. The Lahiri ayanamsa exactly fits the > > astronomical 'earth's tilt'. No wonder it was approved by the > > government of India. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Ashutosh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > crystal pages > > > > > > Saturday, 03 June, 2006 04:41 > > > Re: before Lahiri which one? 2/6 p2 > > > > > > > > > Dear Satish ji, > > > > > > Though Sri Nirmal Chandra Lahiri is noted for his ayanamsha > > (which he > > > never called his own but simply pinned it to the star Chitra > or > > > Spica -- hence properly named as Chitra navamsha. Similar > > > misnomenclature also exists for the so called Yukteshwar > > ayanamsha. > > > Even more so, since unlike Lahiri, Yukteshwar Giri ji Maharaj > did > > not > > > calculate or establish that ayanamsha but merely stated that > it > > was > > > according to astronomical books -- possibly prevailing > panchangs > > > followed by him). All this has been written with more > interesting > > > similarities between it and Raman ayanamsha in earlier posts, > etc. > > > > > > Anyway, much more important than the ayanamsha he gave us, > > Lahiri's > > > primary contribution to the field of jyotish related > astronomy is > > the > > > bringing out of accurate epehmeris/panchangs which were based > on > > > mathematical calculations with modern terms and corrections > given > > by > > > astrophysics. With Lahiri's ephemeris starting in 30s or > > thereabouts > > > the wild variabilities that characterized all but a few rare > > > panchaangs became a thing of past and more importantly, > others > > were > > > forced to follow suit and fine-tune their 'act'. Publishing > just > > > anything and calling it a panchanng or panjika would not do, > any > > > more! > > > > > > That, to me is the major contribution of Lahiri. > > > > > > Kumarji gave a beautiful analogy, or different ayanamshas > being > > like > > > vision-correcting glasses. Mine would not work for you, yours > > would > > > not work for me! My own that worked ten years do not work for > me > > > anymore <LOL> > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > , "R Satish" > > <rsatish1942@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > Mentioning about Lahiri's Ayanamsa,remimded about my > > experience > > > > with a hard core Vedic scholar,from a place called > Kotipalli,on > > the > > > > banks of Godavari in East Godavari Dt. > > > > > > > > This Brahmin,80 +yrs runs a Vedic Patshala which trains > > Hindu > > > > Priests for performimg various poojas etcand is residential > > school. > > > > > > > > When the subject of Ayanamsa came up,I had mentioned to > him > > about > > > > the pabnchang difference between a Kakinada panchang and > > Lahiri's > > > > ayanamsa. He emphatically stated that Lahiri succumbed to > the > > then > > > > govt's pressure manipulating the ephemeris.He stated there > is a > > > > difference of" one pada",between the local panchang.Hence a > > > > differneceof nearly 6-8 month's is not uncommon.I had gone > to > > him > > > > to discuss my son's horoscope,about 3/4 yrs ago.Even in my > > case, > > > > there is a diffence of exactly one year in the balance of > > Chandra > > > > dasa,I have not been to reconcile this difference. > > > > > > > > As stated by you stalwarts,finally it boils down to one's > > > experience. > > > > Fnaticism does not serve much purpose to the cause of > astrology. > > > > > > > > This is one of my several experiemces with the' > stalwarts' . > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Satish > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Prashant Kumar G B > > > > <gbp_kumar@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Pandit Arjun ji, > > > > > > > > > > I have also shared some of these inputs directly and > > indirectly > > > > with many in person and in the groups like these the most > > > > remarkable one being of ICAS founder Secy sri Late K. > > Ashwattappa, > > > > who had contemopt for Raman like all others here as it was > > > > fashionable to do so by ciritising any pouplar person, > and so > > for > > > > his ayanamsa MOST OF HIS critics do not even know the > > difference > > > > between Lahiri and Raman's in terms of deg- min- sec and > > MAJORITY > > > > HAVE NEVER TESTED IT either, just prejueice, jealous of > him. > > > > > > > > > > But my association with him for over 15 yrs he felt he > must > > try > > > > it and did test them randomly and fouind in many cases > Rahu > > Dasa > > > or > > > > Ketu Dasa at the end giving Good results than their > earlier > > part > > > > once he shifted the ayanamsa found it is Guru, or Sukra > > periods > > > that > > > > gave the right results as Subha phala need not wait til > then > > end > > > of > > > > the dasa to deliver. eve Ketu or Rahu if well place can > give > > at > > > > start not in tail end. THIS I HAVE THE BENIFIT OF MNEXT > GURU S > > > > SUBBANNA, AWHO GOT IT FROM HIS GURU they are Mysore > Maharaja's > > > > asthana Jyotishis for generations. > > > > > > > > > > SO ANYONE WITH AN OPEN MID IF THEY TYR IT CAN GET GOOD > > RESULTS > > > it > > > > is open to them no vested interests, except that we want > the > > > subject > > > > to have its good tols an dusers benifit if they try, it is > > > possible > > > > they can stillg et good results in this or anyother left > to > > ones > > > > intution, instincts, knowledge, in RAMAN' success we know > we > > ar > > > > einthe right track so lets move along, and he hsued the > > > traditional > > > > ones which even westerners beofe his birth have > acknowledged > > as > > > the > > > > genius of INDIAN TRADITION's (Vedic) RICHNESS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote: dear > > prashant ji > > > > > > > > > > is is so nice of you to share your astro knolwedge from > > your > > > > three > > > > > decades of experience and since you are one of the > founding > > > > members > > > > > of ICAS, your inputs are always lessons for amateurs. > > > > > > > > > > earlier i was using lahiri for the past several years > and > > > > sometimes > > > > > i did not get them right inlcuidng my own. however, > after > > your > > > > > advise, i started using raman's ayanamsha and am > getting > > the > > > > charts, > > > > > especially dasa periods, more accurately. > unfortunately, > > these > > > > > ayanamashas can make or break a chart. > > > > > > > > > > with best wishes > > > > > pandit arjun > > > > > > > > > > , Prashant Kumar > G B > > > > > <gbp_kumar@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tarun > > > > > > I had replied to you, there were 33 Ayanansa's in > vouge > > > prior > > > > to > > > > > Lahiri stepping in and pushing his own, this is like a > > judge > > > who > > > > > could not undersand the case but yet gave a verdit. > HIS > > OWN. > > > > > > > > > > > > the reason is numerous claims and counter claims to > > deal > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > esp in Tamil Nadu then Madras Province it more a > tamil > > > > centric > > > > > problem there are quite a few thoughts based on their > EQ > > [ego > > > > > quotient] > > > > > > where most of them are based on hapazard Vakya > panchang > > no > > > > > corrections took place ever and if a mistake was made > by > > one > > > in > > > > the > > > > > family chain it continued as it was a brand name so no > way > > you > > > > can > > > > > dispute it. there was Madurai, Kanchipuram, > Srirangam, > > > Tenkasi > > > > > etc groups each had a different Panbu panchangam [or > snake > > > > > calander] quite different from others. and say could > not > > > agree > > > > > comming from one state where will the reminder in > India > > agree? > > > > > > > > > > > > Even the tamils themselves had Gochara of Major > planets > > at > > > > > different months variation, eclipses and all others in > > chaos. > > > no > > > > > scientific basis. Lahiri brought in the Drik or > verifiable > > one > > > > > which is caliculated on established astronomical > principles > > at > > > > least. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about TAMIL EGO QUOTENT if I follow the lead of RR > here > > on > > > > > storry telling these are true ones though > > > > > > > > > > > > DURIGN THE BRITISH RAJ DAYS THE SUPREME COURT WAS > IN > > LONDON > > > > or > > > > > Privay Council as it was called. dealt with a case of > > Iyangars > > > a > > > > > group of Brahmins of the Vishnavas there are 2 groups > in > > them > > > > > Vadagalai [Northern] and Thengalai [southern] in a > temple > > > > function > > > > > there was a dispute how to Mark the temple elephant's > > > forehaead > > > > > with a Y or U shaped Mark of the Vaishnava mark > > > > > > [Vadagalis Mark it as U and Tehengalais s Y with a > > middle > > > > line > > > > > in red] > > > > > > > > > > > > they had enough street brawls as Tamils do and > finally > > went > > > > to > > > > > the PC [prviy council]. so that being the case you can > > never > > > say > > > > > Lahiri had a easy job at least he standadrised our > > calander > > > but > > > > > Islam is free in India each state Imam can see the > same > > > Moon's > > > > > crecent on a different days and have a different > holiday > > the > > > > state > > > > > and Central govt has. all laws are fo Hindus only. > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW the Tamil EQ's latest M karunadhi and former > CM. Ms > > > JJ, > > > > > are meeting in the assembly after 17 yrs normally the > > other > > > one > > > > > resigns if they loose and don't face each other > directly. > > > their > > > > mud > > > > > slinging is of unique depths. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~Tarun~~ <tarun_vst@> wrote: Dear RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > yes Shri Nirmal Chandra Lahiri ji lived in calcutta > but > > > since > > > > > varanasi was key centre for > > > > > > astrology so the calculations were observed and > studied > > as > > > > par > > > > > Varanasi.(as wht i know) > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually sometimes a question arises that what > panchang > > was > > > > used > > > > > before lahiri placed his > > > > > > ayanamasa, what was the base of calculations used > while > > > > making > > > > > chart in ancient times. > > > > > > > > > > > > i think this question is still unanswered. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > www.thevinayak.com > > > > > > > > > > > > --- crystal pages <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think Nirmal Chandra Lahiri ji lived in > Calcutta > > and > > > not > > > > > Varanasi! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not that it makes that big a difference > > longitudinally or > > > > > > > latitudinally but could mean several hours of > > journey, if > > > I > > > > > remember > > > > > > > correctly between Baba Vishwanath or Sankatmochan > or > > > Birla > > > > > temple and > > > > > > > oh say Dakshineshwar or Kalibari! ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > ~~Tarun~~ > > > > > <tarun_vst@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no problem at all. you are very senior to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sir even in my chart i have the same prob.. if > i > > use > > > > raman > > > > > ayanamsa > > > > > > > my dasha changes by 18 months. > > > > > > > > the rahu placement in my chart also changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually raman livd in south india and his > location > > was > > > > much > > > > > near > > > > > > > to equator in comparison to > > > > > > > > Kashi viswanath (base frm where Lahiri gave his > > > > > calculations) so > > > > > > > the diff is easily expected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my dob 19-07-1983 > > > > > > > > time:- 10.35 am > > > > > > > > place:- Jodhpur Rajasthan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sir one shows mars rahu combination in 10th and > one > > > shows > > > > > rahu in > > > > > > > 9th . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i was always confused abt whom to follow. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but if we consider mean node then too my chart > > changes > > > > and > > > > > if i > > > > > > > consider true node then too my > > > > > > > > chart changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but as far as for Miss astro. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i wil say venus ketu combination is not > > > matching .because > > > > > venus and > > > > > > > ketu dont give much better > > > > > > > > results as she is descibing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks and regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tarun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- crystal pages <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tarun ji, > > > > > > > > > <my apologies for mistyping your name as > Varun > > last > > > > time!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a very interesting situation indeed, > > because > > > > ketu > > > > > and > > > > > > > venus > > > > > > > > > though in different signs are hardly 3 > degrees > > apart > > > if > > > > > using > > > > > > > Raman > > > > > > > > > ayanamsha, but if using Lahiri we run into > > another > > > > > conundrum! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are using true nodes, ketu and venus > are > > in > > > same > > > > > sign and > > > > > > > > > house (9th) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUT, if one is using mean nodes,then the two > are > > in > > > > > different > > > > > > > signs :- > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Miss Astro for sharing this chart that > > brings > > > us > > > > > against > > > > > > > yet > > > > > > > > > another wall in Jyotish -- "idhar jaaoon yaa > > udhar > > > > jaaoon - > > > > > - > > > > > > > kidhar > > > > > > > > > jaoon?" as some poet said! :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am assuming that since you did not react > > strongly > > > and > > > > > comment > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > the two being in different sign, that you > utilize > > > true > > > > > nodes? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ayanamsha, equal vs unequal houses, mean vs > true > > > nodes, > > > > > isn't > > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > rich with material that will keep us all > engaged > > for > > > > > lifetimes? > > > > > > > How > > > > > > > > > much work there is to be done, by so few > > sincerely > > > > > interested > > > > > > > > > individuals on this Jyotish Island! And yet > some > > > would > > > > > rather > > > > > > > keep > > > > > > > > > griping and whining about problems that do > not > > exists > > > > but > > > > > only > > > > > > > lie in > > > > > > > > > their (mis)perception! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > > ~~Tarun~~ > > > > > <tarun_vst@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hii ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well love happens when 5th lord is strong. > > > > > > > > > > but first thing is that...frm which angle > you > > find > > > > venus > > > > > ketu > > > > > > > > > combination in his chart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i m using lahiri ayanamsa to analyse. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > he is spiritual because guru is aspecting > lagna > > > even > > > > > being > > > > > > > worst in > > > > > > > > > 7th house. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > currently his buddha dasha is commencing > which > > is > > > > lord > > > > > 3rd and > > > > > > > 6th > > > > > > > > > house. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one more combination of moon+mercury is in > his > > > chart. > > > > > and that > > > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > is a dobutful combination but > > > > > > > > > > as moon is in amavasya then its effects are > > null. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about love marriage...its impossible in his > > > chart.as > > > > > mars in > > > > > > > 5th > > > > > > > > > house so it wont make him to do > > > > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > 7th lord and 9th lord has exchange and that > > will > > > > surely > > > > > make > > > > > > > him to > > > > > > > > > get in arrange marriage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i hope other astrologers will also guide my > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well he himself know abt the effects of 5th > > mars > > > and > > > > 7th > > > > > > > jupiter as > > > > > > > > > per lal kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tarun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- miss_astro19 <miss_astro19@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > his chart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dob--- 26/11/1981 > > > > > > > > > > > tob--- 16.08 > > > > > > > > > > > pob--- ajmer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > he is very very shy of girls, and with > god > > > > blessings > > > > > even > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > > > smart and intelligent no girl has got > > attracted > > > > > towards him > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > distract him, and tht too in this age > where > > any > > > boy > > > > > can > > > > > > > easily > > > > > > > > > have a > > > > > > > > > > > gf. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > many astrologers told he will have a > love > > > > > marriage,but our > > > > > > > > > guruji > > > > > > > > > > > said tht his shukra his weakest, and > jupiter > > in > > > 7th > > > > > wont > > > > > > > allow > > > > > > > > > him > > > > > > > > > > > marriage wht to say abt love marriage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > he is an astrologer himself, and tht too > > very > > > good > > > > > one, u > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > view > > > > > > > > > > > his posts on lalkitab group.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > his dreams come true, he saw many world > > > happening > > > > > much > > > > > > > before > > > > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > > > occured in his derams, like worl trade > towers > > > > > crashing, > > > > > > > killing > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > abdul ghani loan, sunami etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > > > ~~Tarun~~ > > > > > > > <tarun_vst@> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hii, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well i cant say about him. But this > > combination > > > > > often shows > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > described things. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can u provide his chart so tht other > > > astrologers > > > > can > > > > > find > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > > > the reason of him being good. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take care > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bye > > > > > > > > > > > > > === message truncated === > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > > > > > http://in.messenger. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > DIVINITY > > AND > > > > > RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.