Guest guest Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Dear Samir-ji, Namaskaar, This makes sense.:-) Yes, I was looking for this kind of systematic approach to determine the strength of the lagnesh lord. Thanks, Neelay Samir Shah <solaris.smoke > wrote: || hare räma kåñna || Dear Neelay, Namaskar Perhaps I can help. In Vistiji's case, you will notice that he has a Kala Amrita Yoga, which is dominating the effects. This Ketu will dominate as Lagna lord while the KAY is effective. But otherwise, Sanjayji gave the following rules for finding the stronger of the dual lords (in descending order of importance): - if one lord is in the lorded sign, then the other lord is stronger - the planet joined more planets is stronger - the planet aspected by more out of Jupiter, Mercury and it's dispositor is stronger - the planet in higher dignity is stronger - the planet in the stronger sign (Movable is weaker than Fixed, which is weaker than Dual) But this determines the strength of the lord of Lagna. The Arudha Lagna is a slightly different matter. When it comes to arudha padas of signs having dual lordship, both arudhas can and do manifest. In this case you need to look at the strength of each Arudha itself to determine which will manifest and when. I hope that helps, Best wishes, Samir At 18:49 24/05/2006, you wrote: Dear Ravi-ji, Namaskaar, First of all thanks for helping me learn. I am further seeking few clarifications. So the lord of the ascendant is determined by the strength of the two planets, and whichever is stronger will be considered as the lord of the lagnesh, if i understand correctly. My confusion arose, because during the Arudha lecture Visti-ji took his chart as an example. He has Scorpio ascedant Mars in 10 th house in Leo. but Ketu is in 3 rd house in Aquarius. He takes Ketu as the lord of his ascendant, so his AL falls in Pisces. How is Ketu stronger in Aquarius? It is not in a kendra or kona, its not in exaltation, mooltrikona or own house. .. Further in my chart.. Scorpio Ascendant --with moon in it. Ketu in 4 th house in Aquarius. Mars in 10 house in Leo is conjunct with Jup + Sat ® + Ra ( also mars ( 6 Leo 01 is in graha yudha with jupiter 6 leo 43') would this make Mars weaker ? I am still a beginner in this field, so if my questions seem too sillly or obvious please forgive. Thanks, Neelay "A. Ravindran Nair" <rain13club > wrote: Dear Guru Vishtiji, Please, let me try it. Kethu is in 4th house (friends house but temporary enemy and also in neecha rasi - tamo guna). Mars also is in friends house (temporary enemy) but in a satwik guna rasi. Kethu and Mars both are in kendras but amongst kendras 10th is more powerful. Mars has got directional strength in 10th. Moon neecha in lagna and Mars in 10th cause neechabhangam. Hence Mars is more powerful than Kethu and Arudha to be calculated taking Mars as Lagna Lord. Pl guide me if erred in the analysis. Regards Ravi Nair mechumla <mechumla > wrote: Dear Visti-ji and other members, Namaskar. I was going throught Visti-ji's lecture on Arudha Lagna. I am a little confused as to what would be the lord of my lagna to calculate my AL. My chart is as follow: Scorpio Ascendant --with moon in it. Ketu in 4 th house in Aquarius. Mars in 10 house in Leo. In such situation, how do we decide which planet will dominate or be the lord ? Thanks, Neelay Ring'em or ping'em. Make PC-to-phone calls as low as 1¢/min with Messenger with Voice. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Messenger with Voice. ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Dear Visti-ji, Samir-ji, Rafal-ji, Sourvav-ji and Ravi-ji, Namaskaar, Thank you all for your input, time and sharing of the knowledge. I was not aware of the Narayana Dasa book by Sanjayji. This experience was very heartening. I can look forward to posting more queries :-). Thanks, Neelay Samir Shah <solaris.smoke > wrote: || hare räma kåñna || Dear Guruji, Rafal, Sourav, Namaskar In the Narayana Dasa book, Sanjayji says that in order to determine the stronger of the two co-lords (provided one of them isn't in the sign being lorded), we simply find the stronger of the signs in which both lords are placed - using the standard rule for the sources of strength, i.e., 1. The sign with a planet (or with more planets) is considered stronger than a sign without a planet (or with lesser number of planets). 2. If the signs have equal number of planets, then the status of the planets like exaltation, Moolatrikona, Swakshetra etc, should be considered to declare the stronger sign. 3. If they are still equal in strength, or without planets, then the natural strengths of Dual signs being stronger than fixed signs and fixed signs being stronger than movable signs considered. 4. The Lord with a higher degree (used Chara Karaka) shall make the sign stronger. 5. If the two signs have the same lord or if their lords have equal longitudes (irrespective of signs), then for an even sign, placement of Lord in a male sign or for an odd sign, placement of the Lord in an even sign is a source of strength. 6. The sign which gives a higher Dasa period is stronger which is different from both the lists given by me and Rafal earlier! The list I gave was from one of Sanjayji's old mails on the VA list (whose earlier messages appear to have been deleted). I've copied it here: For comparing the strengths of Rahu/Saturn & Ketu/Mars: (a) First see if one lord is in that sign. If so, other lord is stronger. For example, if Saturn is in Aquarius, then invariably Rahu should be taken as its lord. (b) If one of the above houses is with a larger number of planets, then he is stronger. © "SWAAMI GURUJNA DRIGYOGAHA". If one of them is aspected by more out of (aa) Jupiter, (bb) Mercury and (cc) dispositor, then he is stronger. These carry equal weight. Example : Lets assume that we are considering Le & Aq(1/7). Lets also assume that Le is aspected by Ju & Aq by Me, and their lords donot aspect their respective signs. Then there is a tie. When looking for the aspect of lord/dispositor, you can settle for aspect from either lord, but you have to use the stronger lord in all other rules. (d) If one of them is exalted, then he is stronger (opposite for debilitation). (e) One occupying a sign of higher natural strength (Dual>Fixed>Movable) is stronger. (f) One giving more years is stronger. (g) A sign whose lord is more advanced in longitude from the beginning of its sign is stronger. Rahu and Ketu's advancement should be measured from the end of sign rather than beginning. So I'm a little confused now... Best wishes, Samir At 12:04 25/05/2006, you wrote: ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Guys, Namaskar I believe the Narayana dasa book is free online. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** On Behalf Of Rafal 25 May 2006 12:37 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Finding the lord of lagna for Scorpio ascendant Dear Guruji, Samir, Sourav When the JH wasnt available with all features I tend to count narayana dasa by hand. I used this rules which are little different that list given by Samir. Hope we can clarify. 1. present of one of lord in aq/sc sign means the other will rule. 2. number of grahas yuti. 4. guru/buddha/lord rule 5. Exalted 6. Oddity 7. More yrs 8. Longitude. The list was built from early mails on ND and my experience with JH. Regards Rafal Gendarz , Samir Shah <solaris.smoke wrote: > > || hare räma kåñna || > > Dear Neelay, Namaskar > > Perhaps I can help. In Vistiji's case, you will > notice that he has a Kala Amrita Yoga, which is > dominating the effects. This Ketu will dominate > as Lagna lord while the KAY is effective. > > But otherwise, Sanjayji gave the following rules > for finding the stronger of the dual lords (in descending order of importance): > > - if one lord is in the lorded sign, then the other lord is stronger > - the planet joined more planets is stronger > - the planet aspected by more out of Jupiter, > Mercury and it's dispositor is stronger > - the planet in higher dignity is stronger > - the planet in the stronger sign (Movable is > weaker than Fixed, which is weaker than Dual) > > But this determines the strength of the lord of > Lagna. The Arudha Lagna is a slightly different > matter. When it comes to arudha padas of signs > having dual lordship, both arudhas can and do > manifest. In this case you need to look at the > strength of each Arudha itself to determine which will manifest and when. > > I hope that helps, > > Best wishes, > > Samir > > > > At 18:49 24/05/2006, you wrote: > >Dear Ravi-ji, > > > >Namaskaar, First of all thanks for helping me > >learn. I am further seeking few clarifications. > >So the lord of the ascendant is determined by > >the strength of the two planets, and whichever > >is stronger will be considered as the lord of > >the lagnesh, if i understand correctly. > > > >My confusion arose, because during the Arudha > >lecture Visti-ji took his chart as an example. He has > > > >Scorpio ascedant > >Mars in 10 th house in Leo. > >but Ketu is in 3 rd house in Aquarius. > > > >He takes Ketu as the lord of his ascendant, so > >his AL falls in Pisces. How is Ketu stronger in > >Aquarius? It is not in a kendra or kona, its not > >in exaltation, mooltrikona or own house. > > > >. > >Further in my chart.. > >Scorpio Ascendant --with moon in it. > > > >Ketu in 4 th house in Aquarius. > >Mars in 10 house in Leo is conjunct with Jup + > >Sat ® + Ra ( also mars ( 6 Leo 01 is in graha yudha with jupiter 6 leo 43') > > > >would this make Mars weaker ? > > > >I am still a beginner in this field, so if my > >questions seem too sillly or obvious please forgive. > > > >Thanks, > >Neelay > > > >"A. Ravindran Nair" <rain13club wrote: > >Dear Guru Vishtiji, > > > >Please, let me try it. > > > >Kethu is in 4th house (friends house but > >temporary enemy and also in neecha rasi - tamo guna). > >Mars also is in friends house (temporary enemy) but in a satwik guna rasi. > >Kethu and Mars both are in kendras but amongst > >kendras 10th is more powerful. Mars has got directional strength in 10th. > >Moon neecha in lagna and Mars in 10th cause neechabhangam. > >Hence Mars is more powerful than Kethu and > >Arudha to be calculated taking Mars as Lagna Lord. > > > >Pl guide me if erred in the analysis. > > > >Regards > > > >Ravi Nair > > > > > > > >mechumla <mechumla wrote: > >Dear Visti-ji and other members, > > > >Namaskar. I was going throught Visti-ji's lecture on Arudha Lagna. I > >am a little confused as to what would be the lord of my lagna to > >calculate my AL. > > > >My chart is as follow: > > > >Scorpio Ascendant --with moon in it. > > > >Ketu in 4 th house in Aquarius. > >Mars in 10 house in Leo. > > > >In such situation, how do we decide which planet will dominate or be > >the lord ? > > > >Thanks, > >Neelay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Ring'em or ping'em. Make > ><http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/postman11/*http://us.rd./ evt=39666/*http://voice.>PC-to-phone > >calls as low as 1¢/min with Messenger with Voice. > > > > > > > >Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make > ><http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd./e vt=39663/*http://voice.>PC-to-Phone > >Calls using Messenger with Voice. > > > >~ om tat sat ~ > >Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > >Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > >(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar > >the Great who said that the human stomach should > >not become a graveyard for animals. > >(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > > > > > > > >---------- > >! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 || Hare Rama Krishna || Dear Neelay, Namaskar. Please visit www.srath.com <http://www.srath.com> and given in the left-top of the page for Free Books. Best wishes, Sourav ================================================================ , neelay <mechumla wrote: > > Dear Visti-ji, Samir-ji, Rafal-ji, Sourvav-ji and Ravi-ji, > > Namaskaar, Thank you all for your input, time and sharing of the knowledge. I was not aware of the Narayana Dasa book by Sanjayji. > > This experience was very heartening. I can look forward to posting more queries :-). > > Thanks, > Neelay > > > > Samir Shah solaris.smoke wrote: > || hare räma kåñna || > > Dear Guruji, Rafal, Sourav, Namaskar > > In the Narayana Dasa book, Sanjayji says that in order to determine the stronger of the two co-lords (provided one of them isn't in the sign being lorded), we simply find the stronger of the signs in which both lords are placed - using the standard rule for the sources of strength, i.e., > > 1. The sign with a planet (or with more planets) is considered stronger than a sign without a planet (or with lesser number of planets). > 2. If the signs have equal number of planets, then the status of the planets like exaltation, Moolatrikona, Swakshetra etc, should be considered to declare the stronger sign. > 3. If they are still equal in strength, or without planets, then the natural strengths of Dual signs being stronger than fixed signs and fixed signs being stronger than movable signs considered. > 4. The Lord with a higher degree (used Chara Karaka) shall make the sign stronger. > 5. If the two signs have the same lord or if their lords have equal longitudes (irrespective of signs), then for an even sign, placement of Lord in a male sign or for an odd sign, placement of the Lord in an even sign is a source of strength. > 6. The sign which gives a higher Dasa period is stronger > which is different from both the lists given by me and Rafal earlier! The list I gave was from one of Sanjayji's old mails on the VA list (whose earlier messages appear to have been deleted). I've copied it here: > > For comparing the strengths of Rahu/Saturn & Ketu/Mars: > > (a) First see if one lord is in that sign. If so, other lord is stronger. For example, if Saturn is in Aquarius, then invariably Rahu should be taken as its lord. > > (b) If one of the above houses is with a larger number of planets, then he is stronger. > > © "SWAAMI GURUJNA DRIGYOGAHA". If one of them is aspected by more out of (aa) Jupiter, (bb) Mercury and (cc) dispositor, then he is stronger. These carry equal weight. Example : Lets assume that we are considering Le & Aq(1/7). Lets also assume that Le is aspected by Ju & Aq by Me, and their lords donot aspect their respective signs. Then there is a tie. When looking for the aspect of lord/dispositor, you can settle for aspect from either lord, but you have to use the stronger lord in all other rules. > > (d) If one of them is exalted, then he is stronger (opposite for debilitation). > > (e) One occupying a sign of higher natural strength (Dual>Fixed>Movable) is stronger. > > (f) One giving more years is stronger. > > (g) A sign whose lord is more advanced in longitude from the beginning of its sign is stronger. Rahu and Ketu's advancement should be measured from the end of sign rather than beginning. > So I'm a little confused now... > > Best wishes, > > Samir > > > > At 12:04 25/05/2006, you wrote: > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Guys, Namaskar > I believe the Narayana dasa book is free online. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [ ] On > Behalf Of Rafal > 25 May 2006 12:37 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Finding the lord of lagna for Scorpio > ascendant > > Dear Guruji, Samir, Sourav > > When the JH wasnt available with all features I tend > to count narayana dasa by hand. I used this rules which are little > different that list given by Samir. Hope we can clarify. > > 1. present of one of lord in aq/sc sign means the other will rule. > 2. number of grahas yuti. > 4. guru/buddha/lord rule > 5. Exalted > 6. Oddity > 7. More yrs > 8. Longitude. > > The list was built from early mails on ND and my experience with JH. > > Regards > Rafal Gendarz > > > > , Samir Shah solaris.smoke@ wrote: > > > > || hare räma kåñna || > > > > Dear Neelay, Namaskar > > > > Perhaps I can help. In Vistiji's case, you will > > notice that he has a Kala Amrita Yoga, which is > > dominating the effects. This Ketu will dominate > > as Lagna lord while the KAY is effective. > > > > But otherwise, Sanjayji gave the following rules > > for finding the stronger of the dual lords (in descending order of > importance): > > > > - if one lord is in the lorded sign, then the other lord is stronger > > - the planet joined more planets is stronger > > - the planet aspected by more out of Jupiter, > > Mercury and it's dispositor is stronger > > - the planet in higher dignity is stronger > > - the planet in the stronger sign (Movable is > > weaker than Fixed, which is weaker than Dual) > > > > But this determines the strength of the lord of > > Lagna. The Arudha Lagna is a slightly different > > matter. When it comes to arudha padas of signs > > having dual lordship, both arudhas can and do > > manifest. In this case you need to look at the > > strength of each Arudha itself to determine which will manifest and > when. > > > > I hope that helps, > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Samir > > > > > > > > At 18:49 24/05/2006, you wrote: > > >Dear Ravi-ji, > > > > > >Namaskaar, First of all thanks for helping me > > >learn. I am further seeking few clarifications. > > >So the lord of the ascendant is determined by > > >the strength of the two planets, and whichever > > >is stronger will be considered as the lord of > > >the lagnesh, if i understand correctly. > > > > > >My confusion arose, because during the Arudha > > >lecture Visti-ji took his chart as an example. He has > > > > > >Scorpio ascedant > > >Mars in 10 th house in Leo. > > >but Ketu is in 3 rd house in Aquarius. > > > > > >He takes Ketu as the lord of his ascendant, so > > >his AL falls in Pisces. How is Ketu stronger in > > >Aquarius? It is not in a kendra or kona, its not > > >in exaltation, mooltrikona or own house. > > > > > >. > > >Further in my chart.. > > >Scorpio Ascendant --with moon in it. > > > > > >Ketu in 4 th house in Aquarius. > > >Mars in 10 house in Leo is conjunct with Jup + > > >Sat ® + Ra ( also mars ( 6 Leo 01 is in graha yudha with jupiter > 6 leo 43') > > > > > >would this make Mars weaker ? > > > > > >I am still a beginner in this field, so if my > > >questions seem too sillly or obvious please forgive. > > > > > >Thanks, > > >Neelay > > > > > >"A. Ravindran Nair" rain13club@ wrote: > > >Dear Guru Vishtiji, > > > > > >Please, let me try it. > > > > > >Kethu is in 4th house (friends house but > > >temporary enemy and also in neecha rasi - tamo guna). > > >Mars also is in friends house (temporary enemy) but in a satwik > guna rasi. > > >Kethu and Mars both are in kendras but amongst > > >kendras 10th is more powerful. Mars has got directional strength > in 10th. > > >Moon neecha in lagna and Mars in 10th cause neechabhangam. > > >Hence Mars is more powerful than Kethu and > > >Arudha to be calculated taking Mars as Lagna Lord. > > > > > >Pl guide me if erred in the analysis. > > > > > >Regards > > > > > >Ravi Nair > > > > > > > > > > > >mechumla mechumla@ wrote: > > >Dear Visti-ji and other members, > > > > > >Namaskar. I was going throught Visti-ji's lecture on Arudha Lagna. I > > >am a little confused as to what would be the lord of my lagna to > > >calculate my AL. > > > > > >My chart is as follow: > > > > > >Scorpio Ascendant --with moon in it. > > > > > >Ketu in 4 th house in Aquarius. > > >Mars in 10 house in Leo. > > > > > >In such situation, how do we decide which planet will dominate or be > > >the lord ? > > > > > >Thanks, > > >Neelay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Ring'em or ping'em. Make > > > ><http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/postman11/*http://us.rd..\ com/ > evt=39666/*http://voice.>PC-to-phone > > > >calls as low as 1¢/min with Messenger with Voice. > > > > > > > > > > > >Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make > > > ><http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd..c\ om/e > vt=39663/*http://voice.>PC-to-Phone > > > >Calls using Messenger with Voice. > > > > > >~ om tat sat ~ > > >Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > >Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > >(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar > > >the Great who said that the human stomach should > > >not become a graveyard for animals. > > >(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading today > > > > > > > > > > > >---------- > > >! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 Dear Ms. Neelay, I was also learning along with you. Thanks for starting a good string. I referred back all the inputs by the learned Gurujis and it was a nice reverse study method. Regards Ravi Nair neelay <mechumla > wrote: Dear Visti-ji, Samir-ji, Rafal-ji, Sourvav-ji and Ravi-ji, Namaskaar, Thank you all for your input, time and sharing of the knowledge. I was not aware of the Narayana Dasa book by Sanjayji. This experience was very heartening. I can look forward to posting more queries :-). Thanks, Neelay Samir Shah <solaris.smoke > wrote: || hare räma kåñna || Dear Guruji, Rafal, Sourav, Namaskar In the Narayana Dasa book, Sanjayji says that in order to determine the stronger of the two co-lords (provided one of them isn't in the sign being lorded), we simply find the stronger of the signs in which both lords are placed - using the standard rule for the sources of strength, i.e., 1. The sign with a planet (or with more planets) is considered stronger than a sign without a planet (or with lesser number of planets). 2. If the signs have equal number of planets, then the status of the planets like exaltation, Moolatrikona, Swakshetra etc, should be considered to declare the stronger sign. 3. If they are still equal in strength, or without planets, then the natural strengths of Dual signs being stronger than fixed signs and fixed signs being stronger than movable signs considered. 4. The Lord with a higher degree (used Chara Karaka) shall make the sign stronger. 5. If the two signs have the same lord or if their lords have equal longitudes (irrespective of signs), then for an even sign, placement of Lord in a male sign or for an odd sign, placement of the Lord in an even sign is a source of strength. 6. The sign which gives a higher Dasa period is stronger which is different from both the lists given by me and Rafal earlier! The list I gave was from one of Sanjayji's old mails on the VA list (whose earlier messages appear to have been deleted). I've copied it here: For comparing the strengths of Rahu/Saturn & Ketu/Mars: (a) First see if one lord is in that sign. If so, other lord is stronger. For example, if Saturn is in Aquarius, then invariably Rahu should be taken as its lord. (b) If one of the above houses is with a larger number of planets, then he is stronger. © "SWAAMI GURUJNA DRIGYOGAHA". If one of them is aspected by more out of (aa) Jupiter, (bb) Mercury and (cc) dispositor, then he is stronger. These carry equal weight. Example : Lets assume that we are considering Le & Aq(1/7). Lets also assume that Le is aspected by Ju & Aq by Me, and their lords donot aspect their respective signs. Then there is a tie. When looking for the aspect of lord/dispositor, you can settle for aspect from either lord, but you have to use the stronger lord in all other rules. (d) If one of them is exalted, then he is stronger (opposite for debilitation). (e) One occupying a sign of higher natural strength (Dual>Fixed>Movable) is stronger. (f) One giving more years is stronger. (g) A sign whose lord is more advanced in longitude from the beginning of its sign is stronger. Rahu and Ketu's advancement should be measured from the end of sign rather than beginning. So I'm a little confused now... Best wishes, Samir At 12:04 25/05/2006, you wrote: ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Guys, Namaskar I believe the Narayana dasa book is free online. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** On Behalf Of Rafal 25 May 2006 12:37 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Finding the lord of lagna for Scorpio ascendant Dear Guruji, Samir, Sourav When the JH wasnt available with all features I tend to count narayana dasa by hand. I used this rules which are little different that list given by Samir. Hope we can clarify. 1. present of one of lord in aq/sc sign means the other will rule. 2. number of grahas yuti. 4. guru/buddha/lord rule 5. Exalted 6. Oddity 7. More yrs 8. Longitude. The list was built from early mails on ND and my experience with JH. Regards Rafal Gendarz , Samir Shah <solaris.smoke wrote: > > || hare räma kåñna || > > Dear Neelay, Namaskar > > Perhaps I can help. In Vistiji's case, you will > notice that he has a Kala Amrita Yoga, which is > dominating the effects. This Ketu will dominate > as Lagna lord while the KAY is effective. > > But otherwise, Sanjayji gave the following rules > for finding the stronger of the dual lords (in descending order of importance): > > - if one lord is in the lorded sign, then the other lord is stronger > - the planet joined more planets is stronger > - the planet aspected by more out of Jupiter, > Mercury and it's dispositor is stronger > - the planet in higher dignity is stronger > - the planet in the stronger sign (Movable is > weaker than Fixed, which is weaker than Dual) > > But this determines the strength of the lord of > Lagna. The Arudha Lagna is a slightly different > matter. When it comes to arudha padas of signs > having dual lordship, both arudhas can and do > manifest. In this case you need to look at the > strength of each Arudha itself to determine which will manifest and when. > > I hope that helps, > > Best wishes, > > Samir > > > > At 18:49 24/05/2006, you wrote: > >Dear Ravi-ji, > > > >Namaskaar, First of all thanks for helping me > >learn. I am further seeking few clarifications. > >So the lord of the ascendant is determined by > >the strength of the two planets, and whichever > >is stronger will be considered as the lord of > >the lagnesh, if i understand correctly. > > > >My confusion arose, because during the Arudha > >lecture Visti-ji took his chart as an example. He has > > > >Scorpio ascedant > >Mars in 10 th house in Leo. > >but Ketu is in 3 rd house in Aquarius. > > > >He takes Ketu as the lord of his ascendant, so > >his AL falls in Pisces. How is Ketu stronger in > >Aquarius? It is not in a kendra or kona, its not > >in exaltation, mooltrikona or own house. > > > >. > >Further in my chart.. > >Scorpio Ascendant --with moon in it. > > > >Ketu in 4 th house in Aquarius. > >Mars in 10 house in Leo is conjunct with Jup + > >Sat ® + Ra ( also mars ( 6 Leo 01 is in graha yudha with jupiter 6 leo 43') > > > >would this make Mars weaker ? > > > >I am still a beginner in this field, so if my > >questions seem too sillly or obvious please forgive. > > > >Thanks, > >Neelay > > > >"A. Ravindran Nair" <rain13club wrote: > >Dear Guru Vishtiji, > > > >Please, let me try it. > > > >Kethu is in 4th house (friends house but > >temporary enemy and also in neecha rasi - tamo guna). > >Mars also is in friends house (temporary enemy) but in a satwik guna rasi. > >Kethu and Mars both are in kendras but amongst > >kendras 10th is more powerful. Mars has got directional strength in 10th. > >Moon neecha in lagna and Mars in 10th cause neechabhangam. > >Hence Mars is more powerful than Kethu and > >Arudha to be calculated taking Mars as Lagna Lord. > > > >Pl guide me if erred in the analysis. > > > >Regards > > > >Ravi Nair > > > > > > > >mechumla <mechumla wrote: > >Dear Visti-ji and other members, > > > >Namaskar. I was going throught Visti-ji's lecture on Arudha Lagna. I > >am a little confused as to what would be the lord of my lagna to > >calculate my AL. > > > >My chart is as follow: > > > >Scorpio Ascendant --with moon in it. > > > >Ketu in 4 th house in Aquarius. > >Mars in 10 house in Leo. > > > >In such situation, how do we decide which planet will dominate or be > >the lord ? > > > >Thanks, > >Neelay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Ring'em or ping'em. Make > ><http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/postman11/*http://us.rd./ evt=39666/*http://voice.>PC-to-phone > >calls as low as 1¢/min with Messenger with Voice. > > > > > > > >Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make > ><http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd./e vt=39663/*http://voice.>PC-to-Phone > >Calls using Messenger with Voice. > > > >~ om tat sat ~ > >Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > >Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > >(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar > >the Great who said that the human stomach should > >not become a graveyard for animals. > >(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > > > > > > > >---------- > >! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.