Guru Chandaal Yog .........-WHY SO? PEACE PLEASE

[Guest guest]

Dear Arjun ji,

 

I can understand your anguish at what was posted about Jupiter or

against Jupiter and what it can be misinterpreted as. However, it

would not be describing reality if one says that rahu and ketu do not

exist or do not produce their effect.

 

Indeed they produce very obvious effects, unmistakable ones! Known as

eclipses of sun and moon! And astrology does recognize the influence

of grahans. You have raised a question in my mind though!

Varahamihira in his Brihatjataka did not include the lunar nodes,

rahu and ketu but did include those in his Brihatsamhita! Is one to

believe then that Varahamihira ji intended the lunar nodes to be

considered in mundane astrology but not natal astrology? Rhetorical

question -- not a challenge to anyone.

 

The interested thing to remember is not whether they are planets or

blackholes or physical representations thereof but the fact that the

eclipses are so geographically limited and can PREDICTABLY be

observed only from a narrow portion of the earth. It is interesting,

is it not? And yet does anyone know of any documented influence of

eclipses in places where they were 'seen' as being stronger (or not)

than in places where they were not visible? Another rhetorical

question!

 

There are so many questions, so few answers!

 

PLEASE jyotishis, let us stop fighting and not push each other off

the island of jyotish into the ocean of uncertainty where the

churning is still going on and no one knows which side will

ultimately win (God's or demon's and more scarily WHOSE GOD?).

 

PEACE

 

RR

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

<panditarjun2004 wrote:

>

> dear friends

>

> guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him

> making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples

> were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child

> with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam

> ji too knows that they are far from truth.

>

> when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer

> tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that

this

> might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the

arrest

> of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

> guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature

> would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

>

> guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

> planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

>

> 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

>

> 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status

> and they are not planets.

>

> 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and

> hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

> various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are

> not reckoned)

>

> 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any

exaltation

> or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either

> for rasi or bhava.

>

> 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

> negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they

> can project even the worst negative results in a positive

language.

> for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to

a

> distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and

> various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of

> saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread

> and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in

> his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that

> if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

> houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign

land.

> anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful

> presentation of negative things.

>

> truly rahu is known for deceit.

>

> with best wishes

> pandit arjun

>

>

> vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Prafulla ji,

> >

> > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail,

> please let me know. I will send it to you.

> >

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> > Sir

> >

> > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

> >

> > regards / Prafulla

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sri Bharat ji,

> > > Good to read your views.

> > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one

> for me)

> > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number

> 142.

> > > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> > >

> > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will

> > reply back.

> > >

> > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> > limitation is

> > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore,

> Rahu

> > alone

> > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

> dwandhas -

> > Pairs of

> > > opposites like:

> > > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > > 3. Future - Past

> > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > > and so on and on and on.....

> > >

> > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of

the

> > space. It

> > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given

> name.

> > It is

> > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

> Anantam.

> > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya.

> > Infact, it is

> > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

> Satya in the

> > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu

can

> > shock us

> > > into our senses.

> > >

> > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we

> > need the

> > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with

> the

> > viveka

> > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> > Atmabala, Moon

> > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all

in

> > this, if

> > > only we were to will it.

> > >

> > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us,

also

> > releases

> > > us due to the same Lord.

> > >

> > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> > particular trait

> > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance.

> The whole

> > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but

> > MahaMaya. It

> > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature

> amounts to

> > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To

the

> > one who

> > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him,

> the

> > destiny

> > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> > >

> > > Thanks and Regards

> > > Bharat

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear friend,

> > > >

> > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > > >

> > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be

destroyed

> > because

> > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

> Moon as my

> > > > arguing point)

> > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North

South

> > magnatic

> > > > force which always exists in universe.

> > > >

> > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > > >

> > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal

> yog ?

> > > >

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be

> starting

> > > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > > >

> > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > > >

> > > > I have always admired your posts...

> > > >

> > > > As always I could not agree any more

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Souvik

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

> Astrology"

> > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the

> nature

> > > > that is

> > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of

> life and

> > > > can it

> > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good

by

> many

> > > > because it

> > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

> personality,

> > > > dharma,

> > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the

> society,

> > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when

> one

> > > > needs it. Now

> > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population.

> > > > However, when it

> > > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in

the

> > > > society.

> > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad

> > > > things. So for

> > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it

> has a

> > > > role in

> > > > > Spirituality:

> > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

> seeking

> > > > honor and

> > > > > respect in society.

> > > > >

> > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can

> bring

> > > > a balance

> > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

> say: "Take

> > > > the Middle

> > > > > Path".

> > > > >

> > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > Bharat

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected member,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor

> fellow

> > > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th.

> House

> > > > is

> > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

> have some

> > > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite

> of

> > > > what it

> > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

> implications

> > > > to

> > > > > > Rahu.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of

> Jupiter

> > > > and

> > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

> terms per

> > > > say.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> > > > mentality

> > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact

that

> there

> > > > is

> > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

> theories.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist

council-

> now

> > > > that

> > > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

> individually.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a

completely

> > > > > > different turn.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

> <nameisego@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > > destroyer of

> > > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

> Chhed

> > > > Karta

> > > > > > Hai.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

protection

> around

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

[Guest guest]

dear rohini ji

 

rahu represents darkness and deceit or mildly put "maya". jupiter

represents truth or simply put light (light of knowledge). this is

my understanding.

 

yes without darkness and maya, one would not realise the truth.

without death and diseases how one would know the charm of life. in

that sense yes, rahu's role is important in kaliyuga for any human

on the path of realisation to put rahu behind.

 

with best wishes

pandit arjun

 

vedic astrology, "crystal pages" <rrgb

wrote:

>

> Dear Arjun ji,

>

> I can understand your anguish at what was posted about Jupiter or

> against Jupiter and what it can be misinterpreted as. However, it

> would not be describing reality if one says that rahu and ketu do

not

> exist or do not produce their effect.

>

> Indeed they produce very obvious effects, unmistakable ones! Known

as

> eclipses of sun and moon! And astrology does recognize the

influence

> of grahans. You have raised a question in my mind though!

> Varahamihira in his Brihatjataka did not include the lunar nodes,

> rahu and ketu but did include those in his Brihatsamhita! Is one

to

> believe then that Varahamihira ji intended the lunar nodes to be

> considered in mundane astrology but not natal astrology?

Rhetorical

> question -- not a challenge to anyone.

>

> The interested thing to remember is not whether they are planets

or

> blackholes or physical representations thereof but the fact that

the

> eclipses are so geographically limited and can PREDICTABLY be

> observed only from a narrow portion of the earth. It is

interesting,

> is it not? And yet does anyone know of any documented influence of

> eclipses in places where they were 'seen' as being stronger (or

not)

> than in places where they were not visible? Another rhetorical

> question!

>

> There are so many questions, so few answers!

>

> PLEASE jyotishis, let us stop fighting and not push each other off

> the island of jyotish into the ocean of uncertainty where the

> churning is still going on and no one knows which side will

> ultimately win (God's or demon's and more scarily WHOSE GOD?).

>

> PEACE

>

> RR

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

> <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

> >

> > dear friends

> >

> > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling

him

> > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more

examples

> > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the

child

> > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but

tatvam

> > ji too knows that they are far from truth.

> >

> > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the

killer

> > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that

> this

> > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the

> arrest

> > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

> > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that

nature

> > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

> >

> > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

> > planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

> >

> > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

> >

> > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary

status

> > and they are not planets.

> >

> > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas

and

> > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

> > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books

are

> > not reckoned)

> >

> > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any

> exaltation

> > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results

either

> > for rasi or bhava.

> >

> > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

> > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that

they

> > can project even the worst negative results in a positive

> language.

> > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes

to

> a

> > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits

and

> > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead

of

> > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his

bread

> > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these

in

> > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting

that

> > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

> > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign

> land.

> > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is

colourful

> > presentation of negative things.

> >

> > truly rahu is known for deceit.

> >

> > with best wishes

> > pandit arjun

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Prafulla ji,

> > >

> > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you

fail,

> > please let me know. I will send it to you.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> > > Sir

> > >

> > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

> > >

> > > regards / Prafulla

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

<nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Sri Bharat ji,

> > > > Good to read your views.

> > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are

one

> > for me)

> > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal

number

> > 142.

> > > > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> > > >

> > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I

will

> > > reply back.

> > > >

> > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> > > limitation is

> > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways.

Therefore,

> > Rahu

> > > alone

> > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

> > dwandhas -

> > > Pairs of

> > > > opposites like:

> > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > > > 3. Future - Past

> > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > > > and so on and on and on.....

> > > >

> > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview

of

> the

> > > space. It

> > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a

given

> > name.

> > > It is

> > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

> > Anantam.

> > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and

satya.

> > > Infact, it is

> > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

> > Satya in the

> > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness,

Rahu

> can

> > > shock us

> > > > into our senses.

> > > >

> > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses.

So we

> > > need the

> > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide

with

> > the

> > > viveka

> > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> > > Atmabala, Moon

> > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of

all

> in

> > > this, if

> > > > only we were to will it.

> > > >

> > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us,

> also

> > > releases

> > > > us due to the same Lord.

> > > >

> > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> > > particular trait

> > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-

acceptance.

> > The whole

> > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing

but

> > > MahaMaya. It

> > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in

Nature

> > amounts to

> > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack.

To

> the

> > > one who

> > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For

him,

> > the

> > > destiny

> > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > Bharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear friend,

> > > > >

> > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be

> destroyed

> > > because

> > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

> > Moon as my

> > > > > arguing point)

> > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North

> South

> > > magnatic

> > > > > force which always exists in universe.

> > > > >

> > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > > > >

> > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-

Kaal

> > yog ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > >

> > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would

be

> > starting

> > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I have always admired your posts...

> > > > >

> > > > > As always I could not agree any more

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

> > Astrology"

> > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow

the

> > nature

> > > > > that is

> > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part

of

> > life and

> > > > > can it

> > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered

good

> by

> > many

> > > > > because it

> > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

> > personality,

> > > > > dharma,

> > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and

the

> > society,

> > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru

when

> > one

> > > > > needs it. Now

> > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the

population.

> > > > > However, when it

> > > > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor

in

> the

> > > > > society.

> > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the

bad

> > > > > things. So for

> > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However,

it

> > has a

> > > > > role in

> > > > > > Spirituality:

> > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of

things

> > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

> > seeking

> > > > > honor and

> > > > > > respect in society.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it

can

> > bring

> > > > > a balance

> > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

> > say: "Take

> > > > > the Middle

> > > > > > Path".

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > > Bharat

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Respected member,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this

poor

> > fellow

> > > > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the

7th.

> > House

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

> > have some

> > > > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but

inspite

> > of

> > > > > what it

> > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

> > implications

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > Rahu.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route

of

> > Jupiter

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

> > terms per

> > > > > say.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist

(Jup)

> > > > > mentality

> > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact

> that

> > there

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in

either

> > theories.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist

> council-

> > now

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that

the

> > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

> > individually.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a

> completely

> > > > > > > different turn.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

> > <nameisego@>

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > > > destroyer of

> > > > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

> > Chhed

> > > > > Karta

> > > > > > > Hai.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> protection

> > around

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >