Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Om Datta Guru Dear Chandrashehkarji, 1. I have shown by factual data that Jup antar is giving MIXED results extreme good and extreme bad . U used the word " Through Out", so how come in Jup antar he also had Huge Hits. Think about this. 2. Even if we follow Savana days 360, still Jup antar has given him hit Movies ALSO. 3. In both the antars of Jup in Sat and Mer mahadasa, even by Savana years system he has had some phenomenal hits. Think about it Regards SJ , Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46> wrote: > > Dear Sunil, > > If Jupiter not giving bad results through out its dasha means he is not > a Maraka, then how does it giving many flops makes him good for > Amitabha? Think about this. > > The reason you get different date is that perhaps KNR follows 365.2425 > day year for Vimshottari dasha calculations. I use 360 Savana days for > Vimshottari dasha as I have said many a times on almost all the lists > that I write on. > > Take care, > Chandrashekhar. > > suniljohn_2002 wrote: > > > > Om Datta Guru > > > > Dear Chandrashekharji, > > Sorry for the delayed response, schedule has been erratic. > > > > U wrote: > > > I think you have not read all the mails I sent carefully. I said that > > > for Vimshottari dasha implications Jupiter is a maraka and then you > > gave > > > the extract of what KNR said. > > > > > > SJ: I have read all this very carefully. Since you said according to > > Parasari rules (of vimshottari dasa) Jup is maraca for aq lagna, I > > showed that it has still ALSO given GOOD results & I didn't immediately > > give KNRs article, infact for quite some time I didn't even know such an > > article of his existed. > > > > > > > > I first mentioned his Sat/Jup & showed how Agneepath & one more movie > > did well (writing from memory now) BUT in a later email I also mentioned > > that he had flops in that same period & the same I showed that in > > Mer/Jup he had hits and flops too showing MIXED results but definitely > > not a ZERO period or bad period or maraca period. In my mails to Bharat > > or Satya or both it clearly shows that Finally & I did mention in the > > 2nd or 3rd mail to Bharat or Satya that there were flops also in Sat/Jup > > period which no one mentioned. > > U wrote: I also said that Jupiter in 6th did not give good results of > > the 6th bhava. Please read what I have said, in earlier mails. I trust > > this will clarify the matter. SJ: This is the mail of urs > > >" > > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > -@gr\ > > oups.com?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > > > - Terms of > > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology > > > > > > <>" on the web. > > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > > > > <?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > * Terms of > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/338 - Release Date: > > 5/12/2006 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology > > <>" on the web. > > > > * > > > > <?subject=Un> > > > > * Terms of > > Service <>. > > > > > > ------ > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.6.0/341 - Release Date: 5/16/2006 > > > > > > " on the web. Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Dear Sunil, I said through out as you wanted to attribute some stray good incidents to Jupiter dasha operating. And by the way you are using different parameters for Vimshottari than what are told by Garga and Narada. So some success might be seen in there. In every dasha there are antar dashas, pratyantar dashas etc. and different gochar position of grahas. As to Agnipath, it appears to be released in Feb. 1990 film when he was running Mer-Venus period and I do not understand its linkage to Jupiter antar. Of course, I do not have the encyclopedic knowledge that you possess. I would appreciate the hits that he had in Jupiter antardasha using 360 Savana days year, that you refer to. Chandrashekhar. suniljohn_2002 wrote: > Om Datta Guru > > Dear Chandrashehkarji, > > 1. I have shown by factual data that Jup antar is giving MIXED results > extreme good and extreme bad . U used the word " Through Out", so how > come in Jup antar he also had Huge Hits. Think about this. > > 2. Even if we follow Savana days 360, still Jup antar has given him hit > Movies ALSO. > > 3. In both the antars of Jup in Sat and Mer mahadasa, even by Savana > years system he has had some phenomenal hits. > > Think about it > > Regards > SJ > > > , Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46> wrote: > > > > Dear Sunil, > > > > If Jupiter not giving bad results through out its dasha means he is > not > > a Maraka, then how does it giving many flops makes him good for > > Amitabha? Think about this. > > > > The reason you get different date is that perhaps KNR follows 365.2425 > > day year for Vimshottari dasha calculations. I use 360 Savana days for > > Vimshottari dasha as I have said many a times on almost all the lists > > that I write on. > > > > Take care, > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > suniljohn_2002 wrote: > > > > > > Om Datta Guru > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekharji, > > > Sorry for the delayed response, schedule has been erratic. > > > > > > U wrote: > > > > I think you have not read all the mails I sent carefully. I said > that > > > > for Vimshottari dasha implications Jupiter is a maraka and then > you > > > gave > > > > the extract of what KNR said. > > > > > > > > > SJ: I have read all this very carefully. Since you said according to > > > Parasari rules (of vimshottari dasa) Jup is maraca for aq lagna, I > > > showed that it has still ALSO given GOOD results & I didn't > immediately > > > give KNRs article, infact for quite some time I didn't even know > such an > > > article of his existed. > > > > > > > > > > > > I first mentioned his Sat/Jup & showed how Agneepath & one more > movie > > > did well (writing from memory now) BUT in a later email I also > mentioned > > > that he had flops in that same period & the same I showed that in > > > Mer/Jup he had hits and flops too showing MIXED results but > definitely > > > not a ZERO period or bad period or maraca period. In my mails to > Bharat > > > or Satya or both it clearly shows that Finally & I did mention in > the > > > 2nd or 3rd mail to Bharat or Satya that there were flops also in > Sat/Jup > > > period which no one mentioned. > > > U wrote: I also said that Jupiter in 6th did not give good > results of > > > the 6th bhava. Please read what I have said, in earlier mails. I > trust > > > this will clarify the matter. SJ: This is the mail of urs > > > >" > > > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -@gr\ > > > oups.com?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Terms > of > > > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <>" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > > > * Terms > of > > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/338 - Release Date: > > > 5/12/2006 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology > > > > <>" on the web. > > > > > > * > > > > > > > <?subject=Un> > > > > > > * Terms of > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.6.0/341 - Release Date: > 5/16/2006 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology > <>" on the web. > > * > > <?subject=Un> > > * Terms of > Service <>. > > > ------ > > ------ > > > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.6.0/341 - Release 5/16/2006 > " on the web. Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.