Guest guest Posted September 26, 2002 Report Share Posted September 26, 2002 In a message dated 9/26/02 11:20:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ISKCON.Virtual.Temple (AT) pamho (DOT) net writes: > Since 1-Aug-02 I send to Sadhu Svami a request to stop sending me his > e-maiils as you can see at the end of this e-mail, and before an threatening > letter form a "majoor devotee" I continue receiving his spam. > I think Sadhu Svami's postings are to the Katha conference, not from him personally to you personally. His postings have always been Katha related, so they are on point in that regard. That disqualifies it as spam. He seems to be the only one enthused enough to post to the Katha conference. Some seem to appreciate his postings, others do not. If one has a particular objection to a particular devotee's postings the choices would be to not open that persons postings or to drop the conference, but to generate a controversy to shut him down seems unfair. yhs, Kanti dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2002 Report Share Posted September 29, 2002 > If one has a > particular objection to a particular devotee's postings the choices would > be to not open that persons postings or to drop the conference, but to > generate a controversy to shut him down seems unfair. Or you can make a person "distrusted" (Commands/Trusted and Distrusted Persons) so his texts don't reach you. I personally have nothing against Maharaja's postings. There is never enough Gaura-Nityananda katha although SP didn't put so much stress on chanting Their names in his sadhana instructions. Why there should be a contraversy over this? ys bh. Jan www.veda.harekrsna.cz (Bhakti-yoga Vedic Encyclopedia Vedic Library) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.