Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Shreenadhjii, First my plaudit for this: "...This is a great science - when it is in the hands or minds of person with enlightment, good - in noble person, bad - in average, worse - commercially inclined person." Shree. Sreenivas makes two points. He says astrology is a 'kilith vidya' and expresses his preference for raising the bar w.r.t. discussion. How can the latter be possible if the former is the case? I would like members to opine on/ to critique this. Many of us here would like to see the level of discussion kept high enough. Best, RK Dash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Dear RK Dash ji, I have no answers to your question. Srinivas ji, may have some answers. But I also is in support of "raising the bar w.r.t. discussion." You said: > Many of us here would like to see the level of discussion kept high > enough. Me too... Love, Sreenadh vedic astrology, "arkaydash" <arkaydash wrote: > > Shreenadhjii, > First my plaudit for this: > > "...This is a great science - when it is in the hands or minds of > person with enlightment, good - in noble person, bad - in average, > worse - commercially inclined person." > > Shree. Sreenivas makes two points. He says astrology is a 'kilith > vidya' and expresses his preference for raising the bar w.r.t. > discussion. How can the latter be possible if the former is the case? > I would like members to opine on/ to critique this. > > Many of us here would like to see the level of discussion kept high > enough. > > Best, > RK Dash > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.