Kali Yugadi and Planetary conjunction

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadh,

 

If at Kali yugadi ayanamsa was 54 degrees, that is 24 degrees in Taurus

according to Surya Siddhanta, then how if yearly value is about 50 1/3 sec

per year, can we ever arrive at 3102 BC for the start of Kali Yuga??

According to my calculation that would be around 1878 BC...

 

Can you give the quote, where, in which chapter of Surya Siddhanta this is

stated?

 

Yours,

Dhira Krsna dasa,

 

web sites: <http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html>

<Dhira_ayanamsa>

<http://.org/education>

[Guest guest]

Dear Friend,

I am a person from Kerala, India, and is correctly in Delhi. So

don't have the ref books with me, and therefore can't give the exact

sloka ref. no. But use this link to read some to the slokas.

http://sathyavaadi.tripod.com/truthisgod/papers/020406.htm

Also read some good translations of Aryabhateeya. It is a well known

fact that, as per Aryabhata the Kali yuga beginning was 17/18 Feb

3102 BC.

Hay!!!! IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, ARE YOU THE PERSON WHO (WITH OUT

DOING ANY REAL RESEARCH ON THE AYANAMSA ISSUE) AFTER SUBTRACTING THE

CHANDRAHARI AYANAMSA AMOUNT FORM LAHARI AYANAMSA, TRIES TO POPULARIZE

THAT BASELESS VALUE IN YOUR NAME??!!!!

If you are the same, then I drop this discussion here, because you

are already a criminal, and there is no point in discussing, anything

with you. Moderators please forgive me, if it sounds rude. Yes,

you are that ----- Dhira_ayanamsa word used in the web address proves

it!!!!!!!

NB: Others, pls forgive, I am dropping the discussion with this

person here. If you want to know the reason, a look at the hard

research efforts of Chandra Hri, and then visit this fellows site, a

nd see his clims. Surely it will make you laugh, I promise

Regrards,

Sreenadh

 

vedic astrology, "Dhira Krsna BCS"

<Dhira.Krsna.BCS wrote:

>

> Dear Sreenadh,

>

> If at Kali yugadi ayanamsa was 54 degrees, that is 24 degrees in

Taurus

> according to Surya Siddhanta, then how if yearly value is about 50

1/3 sec

> per year, can we ever arrive at 3102 BC for the start of Kali Yuga??

> According to my calculation that would be around 1878 BC...

>

> Can you give the quote, where, in which chapter of Surya Siddhanta

this is

> stated?

>

> Yours,

> Dhira Krsna dasa,

>

> web sites: <http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html>

> <Dhira_ayanamsa>

> <http://.org/education>

>

 

vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid

wrote:

>

> Dear All,

> I was thinking of the Planatary positions at the beginning of Kali

> yuga.

> Aryabhata (476-550 AD) stated that Kaliyuga started 3600 years ago,

> when he was 23 years old (in year 499 AD),

> making the start as 3102 BC. Surya Siddhanta, states that sun was

54

> degrees away from vernal equinox when Kaliyuga

> started on a new moon day, corresponding to February 17/18, 3102

BCJ,

> at Ujjain (75deg47minE 23deg 15 min N).

> +--------------+

> |Mo |As Su |Ve | |

> | |Ma Me | | |

> | |Ju Ke | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> |-----------+-----------------------+-----------|

> |Sa | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> |-----------| Rasi |-----------|

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> |-----------+-----------------------+-----------|

> | | |Ra | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> +--------------+

> kali yugadi

>

> Natal Chart

>

> February 18, -3101 (BC 3102)

> Time: 6:00:00 am (LMT)

> Time Zone: 5:03:04 (East of GMT)

> Place: 75 E 46' 00", 23 N 11' 00"

> Ujjain, India

> Lunar Yr-Mo: Pramathi - Chaitra

> Tithi: Krishna Trayodasi (Ju) (56.32% left)

> Vedic Weekday: Saturday (Sa)

> Nakshatra: Uttarabhadra (Sa) (12.40% left)

> Yoga: Vishkambha (Sa) (94.11% left)

> Karana: Garija (Ju) (12.64% left)

> Sunrise: 6:38:04 am (February 17)

> Sunset: 5:58:04 pm (February 17)

> Ayanamsa: 45-51-00.15

> Sidereal Time: 15:50:56

>

> Body Longitude Nakshatra Pada Rasi Navamsa

> ----- ---------- --------- ---- ---- -------

> Lagna 4 Ar 05' 29.26" Aswi 2 Ar Ta

> Sun - MK 15 Ar 46' 19.93" Bhar 1 Ar Le

> Moon - PiK 15 Pi 00' 49.17" UBha 4 Pi Sc

> Mars - GK 6 Ar 07' 04.25" Aswi 2 Ar Ta

> Mercury - AK 28 Ar 54' 10.94" Krit 1 Ar Sg

> Jupiter - PK 9 Ar 38' 08.55" Aswi 3 Ar Ge

> Venus - DK 5 Ta 16' 27.81" Krit 3 Ta Aq

> Saturn - AmK 25 Aq 15' 17.31" PBha 2 Aq Ta

> Rahu - BK 11 Li 41' 43.14" Swat 2 Li Cp

> Ketu 11 Ar 41' 43.14" Aswi 4 Ar Cn

>

>

> NO!! NO!!! THERE IS NO PLANATARY CONJUNCTION AS PER

JHORA !!!!!!!!!

> (even though it is close)

> WHAT IS THE PROBLEM???!!! IS ANYBODY ELSE BUT CHANDRA HARI IS

> PROVIDING AN ANSWER????

> IS ANYBODY BUT CHANDRAHARI IS DISCUSSING SUCH ISSUES IN DETAIL, AND

> ARRIVE AT TANGIBLE CONCLUSIONS???

>

> With tools like JHora at hand, it is easy to understand the

> statement of Hari that,

> Zodiac (Ra-Si Chakra) is a mathematical 'Modal' (a mathematical

> abstaraction) of the reality,not only for me but for all.

>

> Rest to you all.

> Love,

> Sreenadh

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadh,

 

Hare Krsna!

 

Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not at all working with Chandra Hari

ayanamsa... if you read my webpage good, you'll see that I work with an

ayanamsa less than Lahiri, while Chandra Hari is more than Lahiri. So

there is a difference of more than 1 degree 30 min. How can you claim that

I did not do any research and stole someone else's ayanamsa?

 

>Hay!!!! IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, ARE YOU THE PERSON WHO (WITH OUT

>DOING ANY REAL RESEARCH ON THE AYANAMSA ISSUE) AFTER SUBTRACTING THE

>CHANDRAHARI AYANAMSA AMOUNT FORM LAHARI AYANAMSA, TRIES TO POPULARIZE

>THAT BASELESS VALUE IN YOUR NAME??!!!!

 

To give some astrological content to this message too, what do you think

10th lord Sun in Dasamsa would indicate whether being in Pisces or Aries?

What's the difference?

 

Yours,

Dhira Krsna dasa,

 

web sites: <http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html>

<Dhira_ayanamsa>

<http://.org/education>