Quiz

January 23, 2006

Dear Jyotishi,

Hare Rama Krsna!

I realized I never gave my comments on my Quiz that I had posted. Here it

is:

>Check the matri shoola dasha - quite something is changing when Mars is

>either in Capricorn or Aquarius. See the chara karaka...

In the case of this native, it will depend on which ayanamsa you use

whether Mars is in Capricorn or it is in Aquarius. This changes the whole

set of chara karaka for this chart. Now I can say that this person is more

of a Moon atmakaraka person than a Mars person, though his lagna is

Scorpio. Rather, his wife is more of the Mars person. Anyway, let's see

the chara karaka for mother: with Lahiri it is Mercury, with mine it is

Jupiter. When Mars is exalted, it will be stronger than Moon who is

debilitated. So rudra will be Rahu-Saturn and Sun. Matri shoola dasha will

start in any case from 10th house Leo, who is stronger than 4th house. But

then with Lahiri, matri chara karaka aspects in rasi dristi to Leo thus

giving protection to the mother, and she wouldn't die in the Leo shoola

dasha. With my ayanamsa (47'7" less than Lahiri) Moon is stronger than

Mars and rudra are Mercury and Jupiter. Jupiter as chara matri karaka does

not aspect Leo and death of mother is possible in the first matri shoola

dasha, who is aspected by the Rudra Mercury.

Yours,

Dhira Krsna dasa,

web sites: <http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html>

<Dhira_ayanamsa>

<http://.org/education>

January 24, 2006

Dear Dhira,

I've read your post with an open mind and frozen heart-

Bottom line of what you are saying is that your ayan. works and Lahiri

doesn't-at least for you. Scary for jyotisha though. My impression is that you

don't want to win us over to use your Ayr., just to "prove" that LAHIRI doesn't

work- by extending implications of this further,

everybody should find own ayan. or make just post-factum predictions using

different methods, to 'suit' the 'case'. Theoretically, if each of us can get

different karakas, periods, etc...there is no science of Jyotish. This is my

deliberate exaggeration, to make my point clearer- no need to say, neither you

nor I, think that Jyotish is such a 'loose' syste m.

I know you are a serious astrologer, and what you say does matter-

I am wondering isn't it time to admit that wonderful "science of light" is

DIFFERENT from common understanding of that word! Fortunately! Why knowledgeable

Narasimha, often successful in prediction, denies that he uses anything but

'scientific' /experimentally provable, repeatable..etc - scientific rules whic

DO apply for SIMPLE phenomena, mechanical if you wish- more complex, like life,

person, prana, intuition, clairvoiance, etc...are, simply 'laugh' at limited

sc. arsenal"!!! Don't we need more about cultivating that precious "inner

working' perhaps best defined as 'Jyotish Vidia'/or smth around

that/?

Back to Narasimha example- with full 8th H which I BE LIEVE does lead him, he

believes that denying that precious tool, he adds credibility to Jyotish-

everybody can do Jy- nothing is farther from the truth. /Yet he so beautifully

sharpen that very precious tool by being devoted to cultivating his connection

with higher self, God, power of rituals, etc..

Jyotish would gain a LOT, and Jyotisha as well, by cultivating that precious

personal capital, which perhaps lead some of us to study and love Jyotish, to

start with!

In short, I think that we do not need new Ayanamsha, mi lions of dashas- which

'distort' that precious quality which gets suffocated overwhelmed by unnecessary

increase in quantity and as we have seen, decrease in quality. I love Jyotish,

very, very very much, because.........1 milion reasons...................well,

for the room it leaves for the

that intangible but powerful FORCE /among others f./

Regards,

Anna

Dhira Krsna BCS <Dhira.Krsna.BCS wrote: