Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

on karma

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Shreenadhji:

 

Your views regarding one should move away from merit and sin is the

right path for a person engaged in "Nivritti" marga or Sanyasa with

moksha as its final goal. For the householder or the normal aspirant

who is still in the clutches of karma and is struggling to come into

meaningful terms with his existential problems in life, when one is

engaged in normal duties of a householder, "Pravritti Dharma" in which

merit and Sins have to be taken into account holds good.

 

I am almost sure that nobody engaged in "Nivritti Marga" will be in

the web! Because once one enters Nivritti Marga, one should not even

touch money.... like Shri Ramakrishna Paramhamsa! Even internet is a

commitment which a Sanyasi should avoid or for that matter cannot

afford! So, when we are discussing in a forum of pravritti Dharma

adherents who are trying to evolve spiritually, the concept of Karma

with its associated concepts of Merit and Sin holds good.

 

That is why I think, Pandit Arjun's views on Karma are correct.

 

Blessed be.

 

vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid>

wrote:

>

> Dear Dakshinamoorthi ji,

> I don't agree!!! There is nothing good or bad!! It is the

association

> of once mind that makes a karma good or bad, not the karma in

itself.

> That is why Krishna asked Arjuna to do the battle. That is why the

> carnivores animals eat the flush of animals, that is why cores of

> microcosm are consumed even when we breath!! It is the dharma

> (original inner nature)- of animal, plant, or rock- that is

important.

> One should follow his dharma (orinal inner nature). Geetha advice us

> to follow "Swadharma". Yes, I know the sloka that says "Paropakara

> Punyaya, Papaya para peedanam", but would like to add that, it is

the

> association of mind that makes something papa or punya. It is a

> general statement, and in the deeper sense there is no papa and no

> puna. The path for the seeker of truth is "Punyapunya vivarjitha

> pandha' (The path that is away from punya or papa) puts it. I

remember

> once you yourself pointing to this concept.

> Being detached means leaving Truth and sin, leaving punya and papa,

> leaving Haven and Hell, leaving any kind of habits, - yes but still

> being "here and now" enjoying each moment..........

> The enjoyment books cannot teach us, the enjoyment the soul only

> knows.....where time does not exists............

> Sorry...If I interepted your thought flow.........

> Love,

> Sreenadh

>

> vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> <dakshinastrologer> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Shri. Arjun:

> >

> > Your reply was most appropriate! Infact, I also always give the

> same

> > example of Prison term and remission of sentences due to good

> conduct

> > to explain the dynamic nature of Fate.

> >

> > Blessed be.

> > vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

> > <panditarjun2004> wrote:

> > >

> > > dear friend renuji

> > >

> > > even though your query was addressed to respected

> dakshinamoorthyji,

> > > the question of fixed fate especially future and how far we can

> > > change haunts every person till he or she is realised (self

> > > realisation). i too faced this query myself hundred times

before

> > > realisation.

> > >

> > > let me give you this simple example. all prisoners who are

facing

> > > punishment for various kinds of offences or crimes in various

> jails

> > > are given a sentence of one, two or 14 years imprisonment. so

> they

> > > are fully aware of the FIXED punishment period they shall

undergo.

>

> > > if a prisoner accpets this fact and live like a static rock

> without

> > > any change, he would complete his full sentence as per the FIXED

> > > FATE. if he thinks he can do and undo things on his own and

> escape

> > > from the prison, chances are he may be get caught only to find

his

> > > sentence period getting increased. if the prisoner indulge in

> wrong

> > > deeds and hurt others (para peedanam) then he is subjected to

> > > further punishment by removing from the group to solitary

> confiement

> > > and then consigning him to a dungeon etc. however, if a person

> > > keeps faith in god and believes that by doing good deeds and

goes

> > > extra mile in becoming a better person and do better deeds, he

> would

> > > be released from the prison soonest. as you may be aware,

> > > governors, presidents and kings have the special power which

they

> > > exercise every year (in all countries) to free thousands of

> > > prisoners because of their good behaviour.

> > >

> > > hope the above clarifies.

> > >

> > > with best wishes

> > > arjun

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Dakshinamoorthiji

> > > >

> > > > Thank you very much Sir, and I do not challenge your evolved

> > > > knowledge. Sir, this is confusing. Why do you say that Fate is

> not

> > > a

> > > > fixed structure? As a Buddhist we learn that there is a

'cause'

> > > for

> > > > everything that occurs in one's life. This is 'karma' good/bad

> > > which

> > > > we have accumilated from out past births. I believe there's

> hardly

> > > > any difference between Hinduism and Buddhism. And as you say

> > > certain

> > > > minor bad 'karmas' could be avoided if we lead a good life at

> > > present.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > "If Fate is such

> > > > > fixed structure, there is no scope for remedies; If

> everything

> > > is

> > > > > prewritten, what is the incentive for a living being to

adhere

> > > to

> > > > > Dharmic principles? If FAte is such a preordained thing,

then

> > > > there

> > > > > should be no concept of Merit or Sin, because the person who

> is

> > > > > committing these acts is not responsible for it! Is it not?

"

> > > >

> > > > Sir, I feel that Fate is fixed, but not known to us, on the

> basis

> > > of

> > > > our past deeds and that it self shows that we are responsible

> for

> > > our

> > > > own actions good/bad. It is also our responsiblity to realize

> our

> > > > past mistakes and thereby learn a lesson and evolve ourselves

> step

> > > by

> > > > step towards spirituality or attain 'nibbana' as Lord Budddha

> > > > preached or reach the highest ordination depending on one's

> > > religion.

> > > > Our birth takes place at a certain time, at a certain place as

a

> > > > result of our past sins and merits. Thus isn't it sort of

> > > prewritten?

> > > >

> > > > Anyway I totally agree with you regarding the astrological

> aspect

> > > of

> > > > it and you have cleared my vision, no doubt. Future is the

most

> > > > uncertain thing and no wonder human mind try to find

consolation

> > > in

> > > > astrology in times of trouble. The mere 'hope' given by a

> learned

> > > > astrologer at such times is like a divine blessing to the

> troubled

> > > > mind.

> > > >

> > > > I read and read and find it so difficult to come to a

> absoloutely

> > > > clear conclusion. I thought I had not grasped the subject

> properly

> > > [

> > > > I do know I have estremely little knowledge on this subject],

> and

> > > > wonder why I cannot give a correct analysis. When my friends

ask

> a

> > > > question and when I cannot give the exact answer I feel I a

not

> > > > competent enough to study astrology. I do not want to give a

> wrong

> > > > answer. Well, Sir, you have taken a load off my soulder and

> thank

> > > you

> > > > very much once again.

> > > >

> > > > Blessings

> > > >

> > > > Renu

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> > > > <dakshinastrologer> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Renuji:

> > > > >

> > > > > You are quite right! There is a saying:

> > > > >

> > > > > "Those who know astrology can only indicate in a way what

will

> > > take

> > > > > place in future. Who else, except the Creator Brahma, can

say

> > > with

> > > > > certainty what will definitely happen?"

> > > > >

> > > > > Astrology is not designed to be an ABSOLUTE subject. If

Fate

> is

> > > > such

> > > > > fixed structure, there is no scope for remedies; If

> everything

> > > is

> > > > > prewritten, what is the incentive for a living being to

adhere

> > > to

> > > > > Dharmic principles? If FAte is such a preordained thing,

then

> > > > there

> > > > > should be no concept of Merit or Sin, because the person who

> is

> > > > > committing these acts is not responsible for it! Is it not?

> > > > >

> > > > > On the contrary, planets impel... they do not compel....We

are

> > > > > presented with circumstances that are compatible with our

> karma;

> > > > the

> > > > > choices that we make regarding our actions in those

> > > circumstances

> > > > > cause alterations in the course of our fate.

> > > > >

> > > > > Minor events in life will always be subject to changed

> > > influences

> > > > > arising out of karma accumulated in this birth. But, an

> expert

> > > > > astrologer should be able to predict the broad outlines with

a

> > > > > respectable degree of accuracy. For instance, the

horoscopes

> of

> > > > Great

> > > > > Leaders, intellectuals, spiritual Heads or Heads of State

will

> > > > > definitely show such high promise. In the case of other

> > > persons,

> > > > the

> > > > > role of astrologer is not to predict the course but to

suggest

> > > the

> > > > > best possible course, as the natal influences can be

modified

> to

> > > > some

> > > > > extent with appropriate choices and remedies.

> > > > >

> > > > > Magazines are designed to generate interest among the

readers

> > > and

> > > > > journalistic considerations rather than astrological ethics

> > > govern

> > > > > most journals as far as my experience with them indicates.

> Most

> > > > > astrological magazines often indulge in sensational

> predictions

> > > and

> > > > > brilliant post-event analyses which feed the curiousity of

> their

> > > > > astrologically interested readers. We should be content

with

> > > their

> > > > > educational value in throwing light on the astrological

> > > principles.

> > > > >

> > > > > Predictions come true ONLY WITH VAK-PHALITHA (the gift of

> > > prophesy

> > > > due

> > > > > to which his predictions can come true). Anybody learning

> > > > astrology

> > > > > can interpret.... But predictive accuracy is a hard thing to

> > > > acquire

> > > > > which is obtained only by sincerity of motives and God's

Grace

> > > > > obtained through a flawless living. The predictive accuracy

> > > > differs

> > > > > widely from person to person.

> > > > >

> > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > >

> > > > > gy, "renunw" <renunw> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Gurujis,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have come to the conclusion that mostly what I read in

> > > > astrology

> > > > > > books , articles etc. are interpretations. This is not a

> > > > difficult

> > > > > task

> > > > > > once the past event is known. If one knows the theory

behind

> > > and

> > > > is

> > > > > > intelligent enough, one can interprit the cause of a past

> > > event

> > > > with

> > > > > > 100% accuracy. But it is very sad that most fail to give

> > > > predictions

> > > > > as

> > > > > > to the future events correctly.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Blessings

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Renu

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Dakshinamoorthi ji,

Again i would disagree on certain points, and agree on others. :)

> I am almost sure that nobody engaged in "Nivritti Marga" will be in

> the web!

Can't be that sure, since every bodisatwas (who is also interested in

spreading the knowledge after attaining revelation) needs some way of

communication. He may love internet!! We can not be sure in such

things. :)

> Because once one enters Nivritti Marga, one should not even

> touch money.... like Shri Ramakrishna Paramhamsa!

Here also I am not sure whether this opinion is correct. Rama was a

king, Krishna was a King, Jenaka was a king. All of them realized

persons - till death they were wealthy people and dealt with money,

though it never corrupted them. Osho, Krinshnamoorthi, Ramana

Maharshi, Crist, Socratees, Lavothse every one of them had revelation

but none of them were afraid of money, except Ramakrishna paramahamsa

who was also a person with revelation and was a great guru.

> Even internet is a commitment which a Sanyasi should avoid

> for that matter cannot afford!

They are doing it or not they only knows, and we cannot apply tabu on

them. :) Ok. I am a person following my inner sense and never

categorized it as previrithi marga or nivirthi marga.

The true statement "All classifications are wrong", holds good in

this situation as well. We are classifying margas just for our

understanding, which is not relevant for a person who is "in the"

marga. He could see only one marga that his should clearly sees, that

is the marga he should follow, the marga that gets reflected in his

dharma.

Dear Guruji, we should leave this subject and move on to astrology,

as upasana padhas may differ, and the difference of opinion may

produce hot arguments among the members, which is not at useful or

relevant in the truly following the soul.

Love,

Sreenadh

 

vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

<dakshinastrologer> wrote:

>

> Dear Shreenadhji:

>

> Your views regarding one should move away from merit and sin is the

> right path for a person engaged in "Nivritti" marga or Sanyasa with

> moksha as its final goal. For the householder or the normal

aspirant

> who is still in the clutches of karma and is struggling to come into

> meaningful terms with his existential problems in life, when one is

> engaged in normal duties of a householder, "Pravritti Dharma" in

which

> merit and Sins have to be taken into account holds good.

>

> I am almost sure that nobody engaged in "Nivritti Marga" will be in

> the web! Because once one enters Nivritti Marga, one should not

even

> touch money.... like Shri Ramakrishna Paramhamsa! Even internet is

a

> commitment which a Sanyasi should avoid or for that matter cannot

> afford! So, when we are discussing in a forum of pravritti Dharma

> adherents who are trying to evolve spiritually, the concept of Karma

> with its associated concepts of Merit and Sin holds good.

>

> That is why I think, Pandit Arjun's views on Karma are correct.

>

> Blessed be.

>

> vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Dakshinamoorthi ji,

> > I don't agree!!! There is nothing good or bad!! It is the

> association

> > of once mind that makes a karma good or bad, not the karma in

> itself.

> > That is why Krishna asked Arjuna to do the battle. That is why the

> > carnivores animals eat the flush of animals, that is why cores of

> > microcosm are consumed even when we breath!! It is the dharma

> > (original inner nature)- of animal, plant, or rock- that is

> important.

> > One should follow his dharma (orinal inner nature). Geetha advice

us

> > to follow "Swadharma". Yes, I know the sloka that says "Paropakara

> > Punyaya, Papaya para peedanam", but would like to add that, it is

> the

> > association of mind that makes something papa or punya. It is a

> > general statement, and in the deeper sense there is no papa and no

> > puna. The path for the seeker of truth is "Punyapunya vivarjitha

> > pandha' (The path that is away from punya or papa) puts it. I

> remember

> > once you yourself pointing to this concept.

> > Being detached means leaving Truth and sin, leaving punya and

papa,

> > leaving Haven and Hell, leaving any kind of habits, - yes but

still

> > being "here and now" enjoying each moment..........

> > The enjoyment books cannot teach us, the enjoyment the soul only

> > knows.....where time does not exists............

> > Sorry...If I interepted your thought flow.........

> > Love,

> > Sreenadh

> >

> > vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> > <dakshinastrologer> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Shri. Arjun:

> > >

> > > Your reply was most appropriate! Infact, I also always give the

> > same

> > > example of Prison term and remission of sentences due to good

> > conduct

> > > to explain the dynamic nature of Fate.

> > >

> > > Blessed be.

> > > vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

> > > <panditarjun2004> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > dear friend renuji

> > > >

> > > > even though your query was addressed to respected

> > dakshinamoorthyji,

> > > > the question of fixed fate especially future and how far we

can

> > > > change haunts every person till he or she is realised (self

> > > > realisation). i too faced this query myself hundred times

> before

> > > > realisation.

> > > >

> > > > let me give you this simple example. all prisoners who are

> facing

> > > > punishment for various kinds of offences or crimes in various

> > jails

> > > > are given a sentence of one, two or 14 years imprisonment. so

> > they

> > > > are fully aware of the FIXED punishment period they shall

> undergo.

> >

> > > > if a prisoner accpets this fact and live like a static rock

> > without

> > > > any change, he would complete his full sentence as per the

FIXED

> > > > FATE. if he thinks he can do and undo things on his own and

> > escape

> > > > from the prison, chances are he may be get caught only to find

> his

> > > > sentence period getting increased. if the prisoner indulge in

> > wrong

> > > > deeds and hurt others (para peedanam) then he is subjected to

> > > > further punishment by removing from the group to solitary

> > confiement

> > > > and then consigning him to a dungeon etc. however, if a

person

> > > > keeps faith in god and believes that by doing good deeds and

> goes

> > > > extra mile in becoming a better person and do better deeds, he

> > would

> > > > be released from the prison soonest. as you may be aware,

> > > > governors, presidents and kings have the special power which

> they

> > > > exercise every year (in all countries) to free thousands of

> > > > prisoners because of their good behaviour.

> > > >

> > > > hope the above clarifies.

> > > >

> > > > with best wishes

> > > > arjun

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw>

> > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Dakshinamoorthiji

> > > > >

> > > > > Thank you very much Sir, and I do not challenge your evolved

> > > > > knowledge. Sir, this is confusing. Why do you say that Fate

is

> > not

> > > > a

> > > > > fixed structure? As a Buddhist we learn that there is a

> 'cause'

> > > > for

> > > > > everything that occurs in one's life. This is 'karma' good/

bad

> > > > which

> > > > > we have accumilated from out past births. I believe there's

> > hardly

> > > > > any difference between Hinduism and Buddhism. And as you say

> > > > certain

> > > > > minor bad 'karmas' could be avoided if we lead a good life

at

> > > > present.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > "If Fate is such

> > > > > > fixed structure, there is no scope for remedies; If

> > everything

> > > > is

> > > > > > prewritten, what is the incentive for a living being to

> adhere

> > > > to

> > > > > > Dharmic principles? If FAte is such a preordained thing,

> then

> > > > > there

> > > > > > should be no concept of Merit or Sin, because the person

who

> > is

> > > > > > committing these acts is not responsible for it! Is it

not?

> "

> > > > >

> > > > > Sir, I feel that Fate is fixed, but not known to us, on the

> > basis

> > > > of

> > > > > our past deeds and that it self shows that we are

responsible

> > for

> > > > our

> > > > > own actions good/bad. It is also our responsiblity to

realize

> > our

> > > > > past mistakes and thereby learn a lesson and evolve

ourselves

> > step

> > > > by

> > > > > step towards spirituality or attain 'nibbana' as Lord

Budddha

> > > > > preached or reach the highest ordination depending on one's

> > > > religion.

> > > > > Our birth takes place at a certain time, at a certain place

as

> a

> > > > > result of our past sins and merits. Thus isn't it sort of

> > > > prewritten?

> > > > >

> > > > > Anyway I totally agree with you regarding the astrological

> > aspect

> > > > of

> > > > > it and you have cleared my vision, no doubt. Future is the

> most

> > > > > uncertain thing and no wonder human mind try to find

> consolation

> > > > in

> > > > > astrology in times of trouble. The mere 'hope' given by a

> > learned

> > > > > astrologer at such times is like a divine blessing to the

> > troubled

> > > > > mind.

> > > > >

> > > > > I read and read and find it so difficult to come to a

> > absoloutely

> > > > > clear conclusion. I thought I had not grasped the subject

> > properly

> > > > [

> > > > > I do know I have estremely little knowledge on this subject

],

> > and

> > > > > wonder why I cannot give a correct analysis. When my friends

> ask

> > a

> > > > > question and when I cannot give the exact answer I feel I a

> not

> > > > > competent enough to study astrology. I do not want to give a

> > wrong

> > > > > answer. Well, Sir, you have taken a load off my soulder and

> > thank

> > > > you

> > > > > very much once again.

> > > > >

> > > > > Blessings

> > > > >

> > > > > Renu

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> > > > > <dakshinastrologer> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Renuji:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are quite right! There is a saying:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > "Those who know astrology can only indicate in a way what

> will

> > > > take

> > > > > > place in future. Who else, except the Creator Brahma, can

> say

> > > > with

> > > > > > certainty what will definitely happen?"

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Astrology is not designed to be an ABSOLUTE subject. If

> Fate

> > is

> > > > > such

> > > > > > fixed structure, there is no scope for remedies; If

> > everything

> > > > is

> > > > > > prewritten, what is the incentive for a living being to

> adhere

> > > > to

> > > > > > Dharmic principles? If FAte is such a preordained thing,

> then

> > > > > there

> > > > > > should be no concept of Merit or Sin, because the person

who

> > is

> > > > > > committing these acts is not responsible for it! Is it

not?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On the contrary, planets impel... they do not compel....We

> are

> > > > > > presented with circumstances that are compatible with our

> > karma;

> > > > > the

> > > > > > choices that we make regarding our actions in those

> > > > circumstances

> > > > > > cause alterations in the course of our fate.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Minor events in life will always be subject to changed

> > > > influences

> > > > > > arising out of karma accumulated in this birth. But, an

> > expert

> > > > > > astrologer should be able to predict the broad outlines

with

> a

> > > > > > respectable degree of accuracy. For instance, the

> horoscopes

> > of

> > > > > Great

> > > > > > Leaders, intellectuals, spiritual Heads or Heads of State

> will

> > > > > > definitely show such high promise. In the case of other

> > > > persons,

> > > > > the

> > > > > > role of astrologer is not to predict the course but to

> suggest

> > > > the

> > > > > > best possible course, as the natal influences can be

> modified

> > to

> > > > > some

> > > > > > extent with appropriate choices and remedies.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Magazines are designed to generate interest among the

> readers

> > > > and

> > > > > > journalistic considerations rather than astrological

ethics

> > > > govern

> > > > > > most journals as far as my experience with them indicates.

 

> > Most

> > > > > > astrological magazines often indulge in sensational

> > predictions

> > > > and

> > > > > > brilliant post-event analyses which feed the curiousity of

> > their

> > > > > > astrologically interested readers. We should be content

> with

> > > > their

> > > > > > educational value in throwing light on the astrological

> > > > principles.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Predictions come true ONLY WITH VAK-PHALITHA (the gift of

> > > > prophesy

> > > > > due

> > > > > > to which his predictions can come true). Anybody learning

> > > > > astrology

> > > > > > can interpret.... But predictive accuracy is a hard thing

to

> > > > > acquire

> > > > > > which is obtained only by sincerity of motives and God's

> Grace

> > > > > > obtained through a flawless living. The predictive

accuracy

> > > > > differs

> > > > > > widely from person to person.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > gy, "renunw" <renunw> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Gurujis,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have come to the conclusion that mostly what I read in

> > > > > astrology

> > > > > > > books , articles etc. are interpretations. This is not a

> > > > > difficult

> > > > > > task

> > > > > > > once the past event is known. If one knows the theory

> behind

> > > > and

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > intelligent enough, one can interprit the cause of a

past

> > > > event

> > > > > with

> > > > > > > 100% accuracy. But it is very sad that most fail to give

> > > > > predictions

> > > > > > as

> > > > > > > to the future events correctly.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Blessings

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Renu

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respected dakshinamoorti ji

 

your enlightening words on karma made me felt and touched

reminiscent of my own gurus.

 

after self purification, self realisation, god realisation and

wandering in the himalayas (in the nivritti marga as you mentioned),

my guruji told me as follows:

 

"look son, by doing nothing and detached from everything you have

easily attained these. but you forgot the duty of your very

existence. paropakarartham idam sariram (this body is meant to do

good to others). even your name is meant for use by thers. so go

back to the city and serve the suffering in your limited capacity"

 

guruji, so we, in the manifestation of astrologers and healers, are

doing the same service in our own ways. please continue guiding us

on the right path with your words of wisdom off and on.

 

with best wishes and regards

arjun

 

 

vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

<dakshinastrologer> wrote:

>

> Dear Shreenadhji:

>

> Your views regarding one should move away from merit and sin is

the

> right path for a person engaged in "Nivritti" marga or Sanyasa

with

> moksha as its final goal. For the householder or the normal

aspirant

> who is still in the clutches of karma and is struggling to come

into

> meaningful terms with his existential problems in life, when one

is

> engaged in normal duties of a householder, "Pravritti Dharma" in

which

> merit and Sins have to be taken into account holds good.

>

> I am almost sure that nobody engaged in "Nivritti Marga" will be

in

> the web! Because once one enters Nivritti Marga, one should not

even

> touch money.... like Shri Ramakrishna Paramhamsa! Even internet

is a

> commitment which a Sanyasi should avoid or for that matter cannot

> afford! So, when we are discussing in a forum of pravritti Dharma

> adherents who are trying to evolve spiritually, the concept of

Karma

> with its associated concepts of Merit and Sin holds good.

>

> That is why I think, Pandit Arjun's views on Karma are correct.

>

> Blessed be.

>

> vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Dakshinamoorthi ji,

> > I don't agree!!! There is nothing good or bad!! It is the

> association

> > of once mind that makes a karma good or bad, not the karma in

> itself.

> > That is why Krishna asked Arjuna to do the battle. That is why

the

> > carnivores animals eat the flush of animals, that is why cores

of

> > microcosm are consumed even when we breath!! It is the dharma

> > (original inner nature)- of animal, plant, or rock- that is

> important.

> > One should follow his dharma (orinal inner nature). Geetha

advice us

> > to follow "Swadharma". Yes, I know the sloka that

says "Paropakara

> > Punyaya, Papaya para peedanam", but would like to add that, it

is

> the

> > association of mind that makes something papa or punya. It is a

> > general statement, and in the deeper sense there is no papa and

no

> > puna. The path for the seeker of truth is "Punyapunya vivarjitha

> > pandha' (The path that is away from punya or papa) puts it. I

> remember

> > once you yourself pointing to this concept.

> > Being detached means leaving Truth and sin, leaving punya and

papa,

> > leaving Haven and Hell, leaving any kind of habits, - yes but

still

> > being "here and now" enjoying each moment..........

> > The enjoyment books cannot teach us, the enjoyment the soul

only

> > knows.....where time does not exists............

> > Sorry...If I interepted your thought flow.........

> > Love,

> > Sreenadh

> >

> > vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> > <dakshinastrologer> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Shri. Arjun:

> > >

> > > Your reply was most appropriate! Infact, I also always give

the

> > same

> > > example of Prison term and remission of sentences due to good

> > conduct

> > > to explain the dynamic nature of Fate.

> > >

> > > Blessed be.

> > > vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

> > > <panditarjun2004> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > dear friend renuji

> > > >

> > > > even though your query was addressed to respected

> > dakshinamoorthyji,

> > > > the question of fixed fate especially future and how far we

can

> > > > change haunts every person till he or she is realised (self

> > > > realisation). i too faced this query myself hundred times

> before

> > > > realisation.

> > > >

> > > > let me give you this simple example. all prisoners who are

> facing

> > > > punishment for various kinds of offences or crimes in

various

> > jails

> > > > are given a sentence of one, two or 14 years imprisonment.

so

> > they

> > > > are fully aware of the FIXED punishment period they shall

> undergo.

> >

> > > > if a prisoner accpets this fact and live like a static rock

> > without

> > > > any change, he would complete his full sentence as per the

FIXED

> > > > FATE. if he thinks he can do and undo things on his own and

> > escape

> > > > from the prison, chances are he may be get caught only to

find

> his

> > > > sentence period getting increased. if the prisoner indulge

in

> > wrong

> > > > deeds and hurt others (para peedanam) then he is subjected

to

> > > > further punishment by removing from the group to solitary

> > confiement

> > > > and then consigning him to a dungeon etc. however, if a

person

> > > > keeps faith in god and believes that by doing good deeds and

> goes

> > > > extra mile in becoming a better person and do better deeds,

he

> > would

> > > > be released from the prison soonest. as you may be aware,

> > > > governors, presidents and kings have the special power which

> they

> > > > exercise every year (in all countries) to free thousands of

> > > > prisoners because of their good behaviour.

> > > >

> > > > hope the above clarifies.

> > > >

> > > > with best wishes

> > > > arjun

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "renunw"

<renunw>

> > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Dakshinamoorthiji

> > > > >

> > > > > Thank you very much Sir, and I do not challenge your

evolved

> > > > > knowledge. Sir, this is confusing. Why do you say that

Fate is

> > not

> > > > a

> > > > > fixed structure? As a Buddhist we learn that there is a

> 'cause'

> > > > for

> > > > > everything that occurs in one's life. This is 'karma'

good/bad

> > > > which

> > > > > we have accumilated from out past births. I believe

there's

> > hardly

> > > > > any difference between Hinduism and Buddhism. And as you

say

> > > > certain

> > > > > minor bad 'karmas' could be avoided if we lead a good life

at

> > > > present.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > "If Fate is such

> > > > > > fixed structure, there is no scope for remedies; If

> > everything

> > > > is

> > > > > > prewritten, what is the incentive for a living being to

> adhere

> > > > to

> > > > > > Dharmic principles? If FAte is such a preordained

thing,

> then

> > > > > there

> > > > > > should be no concept of Merit or Sin, because the person

who

> > is

> > > > > > committing these acts is not responsible for it! Is it

not?

> "

> > > > >

> > > > > Sir, I feel that Fate is fixed, but not known to us, on

the

> > basis

> > > > of

> > > > > our past deeds and that it self shows that we are

responsible

> > for

> > > > our

> > > > > own actions good/bad. It is also our responsiblity to

realize

> > our

> > > > > past mistakes and thereby learn a lesson and evolve

ourselves

> > step

> > > > by

> > > > > step towards spirituality or attain 'nibbana' as Lord

Budddha

> > > > > preached or reach the highest ordination depending on

one's

> > > > religion.

> > > > > Our birth takes place at a certain time, at a certain

place as

> a

> > > > > result of our past sins and merits. Thus isn't it sort of

> > > > prewritten?

> > > > >

> > > > > Anyway I totally agree with you regarding the astrological

> > aspect

> > > > of

> > > > > it and you have cleared my vision, no doubt. Future is the

> most

> > > > > uncertain thing and no wonder human mind try to find

> consolation

> > > > in

> > > > > astrology in times of trouble. The mere 'hope' given by a

> > learned

> > > > > astrologer at such times is like a divine blessing to the

> > troubled

> > > > > mind.

> > > > >

> > > > > I read and read and find it so difficult to come to a

> > absoloutely

> > > > > clear conclusion. I thought I had not grasped the subject

> > properly

> > > > [

> > > > > I do know I have estremely little knowledge on this

subject],

> > and

> > > > > wonder why I cannot give a correct analysis. When my

friends

> ask

> > a

> > > > > question and when I cannot give the exact answer I feel I

a

> not

> > > > > competent enough to study astrology. I do not want to give

a

> > wrong

> > > > > answer. Well, Sir, you have taken a load off my soulder

and

> > thank

> > > > you

> > > > > very much once again.

> > > > >

> > > > > Blessings

> > > > >

> > > > > Renu

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic-

astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> > > > > <dakshinastrologer> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Renuji:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are quite right! There is a saying:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > "Those who know astrology can only indicate in a way

what

> will

> > > > take

> > > > > > place in future. Who else, except the Creator Brahma,

can

> say

> > > > with

> > > > > > certainty what will definitely happen?"

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Astrology is not designed to be an ABSOLUTE subject. If

> Fate

> > is

> > > > > such

> > > > > > fixed structure, there is no scope for remedies; If

> > everything

> > > > is

> > > > > > prewritten, what is the incentive for a living being to

> adhere

> > > > to

> > > > > > Dharmic principles? If FAte is such a preordained

thing,

> then

> > > > > there

> > > > > > should be no concept of Merit or Sin, because the person

who

> > is

> > > > > > committing these acts is not responsible for it! Is it

not?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On the contrary, planets impel... they do not

compel....We

> are

> > > > > > presented with circumstances that are compatible with

our

> > karma;

> > > > > the

> > > > > > choices that we make regarding our actions in those

> > > > circumstances

> > > > > > cause alterations in the course of our fate.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Minor events in life will always be subject to changed

> > > > influences

> > > > > > arising out of karma accumulated in this birth. But, an

> > expert

> > > > > > astrologer should be able to predict the broad outlines

with

> a

> > > > > > respectable degree of accuracy. For instance, the

> horoscopes

> > of

> > > > > Great

> > > > > > Leaders, intellectuals, spiritual Heads or Heads of

State

> will

> > > > > > definitely show such high promise. In the case of other

> > > > persons,

> > > > > the

> > > > > > role of astrologer is not to predict the course but to

> suggest

> > > > the

> > > > > > best possible course, as the natal influences can be

> modified

> > to

> > > > > some

> > > > > > extent with appropriate choices and remedies.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Magazines are designed to generate interest among the

> readers

> > > > and

> > > > > > journalistic considerations rather than astrological

ethics

> > > > govern

> > > > > > most journals as far as my experience with them

indicates.

> > Most

> > > > > > astrological magazines often indulge in sensational

> > predictions

> > > > and

> > > > > > brilliant post-event analyses which feed the curiousity

of

> > their

> > > > > > astrologically interested readers. We should be content

> with

> > > > their

> > > > > > educational value in throwing light on the astrological

> > > > principles.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Predictions come true ONLY WITH VAK-PHALITHA (the gift

of

> > > > prophesy

> > > > > due

> > > > > > to which his predictions can come true). Anybody

learning

> > > > > astrology

> > > > > > can interpret.... But predictive accuracy is a hard

thing to

> > > > > acquire

> > > > > > which is obtained only by sincerity of motives and God's

> Grace

> > > > > > obtained through a flawless living. The predictive

accuracy

> > > > > differs

> > > > > > widely from person to person.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > gy, "renunw" <renunw> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Gurujis,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have come to the conclusion that mostly what I read

in

> > > > > astrology

> > > > > > > books , articles etc. are interpretations. This is not

a

> > > > > difficult

> > > > > > task

> > > > > > > once the past event is known. If one knows the theory

> behind

> > > > and

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > intelligent enough, one can interprit the cause of a

past

> > > > event

> > > > > with

> > > > > > > 100% accuracy. But it is very sad that most fail to

give

> > > > > predictions

> > > > > > as

> > > > > > > to the future events correctly.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Blessings

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Renu

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

reminiscent of my own gurus.after self purification, self realisation, god

realisation and wandering in the himalayas (in the nivritti marga as you

mentioned), my guruji told me as follows:"look son, by doing nothing and

detached from everything you have easily attained these. but you forgot the

duty of your very existence. paropakarartham idam sariram (this body is meant

to do good to others). even your name is meant for use by thers. so go back

to the city and serve the suffering in your limited capacity"guruji, so we, in

the manifestation of astrologers and healers, are doing the same service in our

own ways. please continue guiding us on the right path with your words of

wisdom off and on.with best wishes and regardsarjun--- In

vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer" <dakshinastrologer>

wrote:>> Dear Shreenadhji:>

> Your views regarding one should move away from merit and sin is the > right

path for a person engaged in "Nivritti" marga or Sanyasa with > moksha as its

final goal. For the householder or the normal aspirant > who is still in the

clutches of karma and is struggling to come into > meaningful terms with his

existential problems in life, when one is > engaged in normal duties of a

householder, "Pravritti Dharma" in which > merit and Sins have to be taken into

account holds good.> > I am almost sure that nobody engaged in "Nivritti Marga"

will be in > the web! Because once one enters Nivritti Marga, one should not

even > touch money.... like Shri Ramakrishna Paramhamsa! Even internet is a >

commitment which a Sanyasi should avoid or for that matter cannot > afford!

So, when we are discussing in a forum of pravritti Dharma >

adherents who are trying to evolve spiritually, the concept of Karma > with its

associated concepts of Merit and Sin holds good.> > That is why I think, Pandit

Arjun's views on Karma are correct.> > Blessed be.> > --- In

vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid> > wrote:> >> > Dear

Dakshinamoorthi ji,> > I don't agree!!! There is nothing good or bad!! It is

the > association > > of once mind that makes a karma good or bad, not the

karma in > itself. > > That is why Krishna asked Arjuna to do the battle. That

is why the > > carnivores animals eat the flush of animals, that is why cores

of > > microcosm are consumed even when we breath!! It is the dharma > >

(original inner nature)- of animal, plant, or rock- that is > important. > >

One should follow his dharma (orinal inner

nature). Geetha advice us > > to follow "Swadharma". Yes, I know the sloka that

says "Paropakara > > Punyaya, Papaya para peedanam", but would like to add

that, it is > the > > association of mind that makes something papa or punya.

It is a > > general statement, and in the deeper sense there is no papa and no

> > puna. The path for the seeker of truth is "Punyapunya vivarjitha > >

pandha' (The path that is away from punya or papa) puts it. I > remember > >

once you yourself pointing to this concept.> > Being detached means leaving

Truth and sin, leaving punya and papa, > > leaving Haven and Hell, leaving any

kind of habits, - yes but still > > being "here and now" enjoying each

moment..........> > The enjoyment books cannot teach us, the enjoyment the

soul only > > knows.....where time does not

exists............> > Sorry...If I interepted your thought flow.........> >

Love,> > Sreenadh> > > > vedic astrology,

"dakshinastrologer" > > <dakshinastrologer> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Shri.

Arjun:> > > > > > Your reply was most appropriate! Infact, I also always give

the > > same > > > example of Prison term and remission of sentences due to

good > > conduct > > > to explain the dynamic nature of Fate.> > > > > >

Blessed be.> > > vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004" > >

> <panditarjun2004> wrote:> > > >> > > > dear friend renuji> > > > > > > >

even though your query was addressed to respected > > dakshinamoorthyji, >

> > > the question of fixed fate especially future and how far we can > > > >

change haunts every person till he or she is realised (self > > > >

realisation). i too faced this query myself hundred times > before > > > >

realisation.> > > > > > > > let me give you this simple example. all prisoners

who are > facing > > > > punishment for various kinds of offences or crimes in

various > > jails > > > > are given a sentence of one, two or 14 years

imprisonment. so > > they > > > > are fully aware of the FIXED punishment

period they shall > undergo. > > > > > > if a prisoner accpets this fact and

live like a static rock > > without > > > > any change, he would complete his

full sentence as per the FIXED > >

> > FATE. if he thinks he can do and undo things on his own and > > escape > >

> > from the prison, chances are he may be get caught only to find > his > > >

> sentence period getting increased. if the prisoner indulge in > > wrong > >

> > deeds and hurt others (para peedanam) then he is subjected to > > > >

further punishment by removing from the group to solitary > > confiement > > >

> and then consigning him to a dungeon etc. however, if a person > > > > keeps

faith in god and believes that by doing good deeds and > goes > > > > extra mile

in becoming a better person and do better deeds, he > > would > > > > be

released from the prison soonest. as you may be aware, > > > > governors,

presidents and kings have the special power which

> they > > > > exercise every year (in all countries) to free thousands of > > >

> prisoners because of their good behaviour.> > > > > > > > hope the above

clarifies.> > > > > > > > with best wishes> > > > arjun> > > > > > > > --- In

vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw> > > > wrote:> > > > >>

> > > > Dear Dakshinamoorthiji> > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much Sir, and

I do not challenge your evolved > > > > > knowledge. Sir, this is confusing.

Why do you say that Fate is > > not > > > > a > > > > > fixed structure? As a

Buddhist we learn that there is a > 'cause' > > > > for > > > > > everything

that

occurs in one's life. This is 'karma' good/bad > > > > which > > > > > we have

accumilated from out past births. I believe there's > > hardly > > > > > any

difference between Hinduism and Buddhism. And as you say > > > > certain > > >

> > minor bad 'karmas' could be avoided if we lead a good life at > > > >

present.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "If Fate is such > > > > > > fixed

structure, there is no scope for remedies; If > > everything > > > > is > > >

> > > prewritten, what is the incentive for a living being to > adhere > > > >

to > > > > > > Dharmic principles? If FAte is such a preordained thing, > then

> > > > > there >

> > > > > should be no concept of Merit or Sin, because the person who > > is >

> > > > > committing these acts is not responsible for it! Is it not?> "> > >

> > > > > > > Sir, I feel that Fate is fixed, but not known to us, on the > >

basis > > > > of > > > > > our past deeds and that it self shows that we are

responsible > > for > > > > our > > > > > own actions good/bad. It is also our

responsiblity to realize > > our > > > > > past mistakes and thereby learn a

lesson and evolve ourselves > > step > > > > by > > > > > step towards

spirituality or attain 'nibbana' as Lord Budddha > > > > > preached or reach

the highest ordination depending on one's > > > >

religion. > > > > > Our birth takes place at a certain time, at a certain place

as > a > > > > > result of our past sins and merits. Thus isn't it sort of > >

> > prewritten?> > > > > > > > > > Anyway I totally agree with you regarding

the astrological > > aspect > > > > of > > > > > it and you have cleared my

vision, no doubt. Future is the > most > > > > > uncertain thing and no wonder

human mind try to find > consolation > > > > in > > > > > astrology in times of

trouble. The mere 'hope' given by a > > learned > > > > > astrologer at such

times is like a divine blessing to the > > troubled > > > > > mind. > > > > > >

> > > > I read and read and find it so difficult to come

to a > > absoloutely > > > > > clear conclusion. I thought I had not grasped the

subject > > properly > > > > [ > > > > > I do know I have estremely little

knowledge on this subject], > > and > > > > > wonder why I cannot give a

correct analysis. When my friends > ask > > a > > > > > question and when I

cannot give the exact answer I feel I a > not > > > > > competent enough to

study astrology. I do not want to give a > > wrong > > > > > answer. Well, Sir,

you have taken a load off my soulder and > > thank > > > > you > > > > > very

much once again.> > > > > > > > > > Blessings> > > > > > > > > > Renu> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In

vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer" > > > > >

<dakshinastrologer> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Renuji:> > > > > > >

> > > > > You are quite right! There is a saying:> > > > > > > > > > > > "Those

who know astrology can only indicate in a way what > will > > > > take > > > > >

> place in future. Who else, except the Creator Brahma, can > say > > > > with

> > > > > > certainty what will definitely happen?"> > > > > > > > > > > >

Astrology

is not designed to be an ABSOLUTE subject. If > Fate > > is > > > > > such > >

> > > > fixed structure, there is no scope for remedies; If > > everything > >

> > is > > > > > > prewritten, what is the incentive for a living being to >

adhere > > > > to > > > > > > Dharmic principles? If FAte is such a

preordained thing, > then > > > > > there > > > > > > should be no concept of

Merit or Sin, because the person who > > is > > > > > > committing these acts

is not responsible for it! Is it not?> > > > > > > > > > > > On the contrary,

planets impel... they do not compel....We > are > > > > > > presented with

circumstances that are compatible with

our > > karma; > > > > > the > > > > > > choices that we make regarding our

actions in those > > > > circumstances > > > > > > cause alterations in the

course of our fate.> > > > > > > > > > > > Minor events in life will always be

subject to changed > > > > influences > > > > > > arising out of karma

accumulated in this birth. But, an > > expert > > > > > > astrologer should be

able to predict the broad outlines with > a > > > > > > respectable degree of

accuracy. For instance, the > horoscopes > > of > > > > > Great > > > > > >

Leaders, intellectuals, spiritual Heads or Heads of State > will > > > > > >

definitely show such high promise.

In the case of other > > > > persons, > > > > > the > > > > > > role of

astrologer is not to predict the course but to > suggest > > > > the > > > > >

> best possible course, as the natal influences can be > modified > > to > > >

> > some > > > > > > extent with appropriate choices and remedies.> > > > > > >

> > > > > Magazines are designed to generate interest among the > readers > > >

> and > > > > > > journalistic considerations rather than astrological ethics >

> > > govern > > > > > > most journals as far as my experience with them

indicates. > > Most > > > > > > astrological magazines often indulge in

sensational > > predictions >

> > > and > > > > > > brilliant post-event analyses which feed the curiousity of

> > their > > > > > > astrologically interested readers. We should be content >

with > > > > their > > > > > > educational value in throwing light on the

astrological > > > > principles.> > > > > > > > > > > > Predictions come true

ONLY WITH VAK-PHALITHA (the gift of > > > > prophesy > > > > > due > > > > > >

to which his predictions can come true). Anybody learning > > > > > astrology

> > > > > > can interpret.... But predictive accuracy is a hard thing to > > >

> > acquire > > > > > > which is obtained only by sincerity of motives and

God's > Grace > >

> > > > obtained through a flawless living. The predictive accuracy > > > > >

differs > > > > > > widely from person to person.> > > > > > > > > > > >

Blessed be.> > > > > > > > > > > > gy, "renunw" <renunw>

wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Gurujis,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I

have come to the conclusion that mostly what I read in > > > > > astrology > >

> > > > > books , articles etc. are interpretations. This is not a > > > > >

difficult > > > > > > task > > > > > > > once the past event is known. If one

knows the theory > behind > > > > and > > >

> > is > > > > > > > intelligent enough, one can interprit the cause of a past >

> > > event > > > > > with > > > > > > > 100% accuracy. But it is very sad that

most fail to give > > > > > predictions > > > > > > as > > > > > > > to the

future events correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessings> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > Renu> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >>

Photos Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...