Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Dear members, Thank you very much for clearing my doubts on "Rash debilitated / Navamsa owned". Yes, I understand that no astrologer will evaluate a chart without certifying the planetary strength based on navamsa. I apologise for taking so long to reply. As I mentioned in my previous mail, I am still a learner, and therefore, take time to digest all the information I read from the mails. In Mr. Akhil Jain's mail, he commented "the role of navamsa probably could not have been described in a better if Rasi chart is body Navamsa is pran." Would this mean that the Rasi chart predominantly signify the "gross" nature of the signification while the Navamsa the "subtle". I understand that each planet has both gross and subtle nature associated to the graha, such as Saturn provides obstruction on the physical plan, or stubbornness on the subtle. Therefore, would it be correct if I interpret owned or exalted planets in Navamsa to flourish more the subtle aspects of the planet? Also, regarding the dusthanas such as the 6th house. It is preferable that the sixth lord to be weaken or "not-prominent", because he carries many negative properties. How about the planet that sits in the house. If a planet such as Mars is debilitated in the 6th house, would that mean the negative properties would stand weak? Furthermore, beside the planetary strength evaluation that we can extract from the condition, if in such particular chart the planet is owned in Navamsa, could we interpret that the subtle signification of Mars will be more predominant? I would very much appreciate if the members of the group can get rid of my confusion. Thank you very much. Roy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.