Probodhji: Why Kundalini Awakening impossible in women?

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir,

 

 

Hope you dont mind asking some doubts.

 

1. Do you mean Mritasanjeevani vidya is Kundalini vidya? When

Kunadalini Vidya is to attain liberation from birth -death cycle,

Mritasanjeevani is to revive life to dead ones (ones karma is not

getting burnt here)which seems to me like opposite of Kundalini

vidya. Right? Or is there any hidden meaning?

Can merging with Paramatma in kundalini vidya, be equated to gaining

immortality with Mritasanjeevani?

 

2. What do you say of Maitreyi to whom her husband, sage Yajnavalkya,

imparted all knowledge?

 

 

Regards,

Jyothi

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande"

<amolmandar> wrote:

>

> Dear All Namaste

>

> There were angry and some very angry reactions on this thread. It

> seems that my understanding of Kundalini activation is different

> than most of the people in this thread. My knowledge is stright

from

> the persons who have experienced KA and have told me many hidden

> things in most logical manner.(Many have doubt about this but they

> are not at fault. I am very poor at expressing what I know!)

>

> There seems to be some confusion about the keywords such as

> Moksha,Bhaktimarga and Kundalini. Basic aim of Sadhana is to obtain

> gyana in Adhyatma. You can obtain knowledge by many means like by

> Gyana,Raj,or Bhakti yoga. Kundalini yoga is subclass of Raja yoga.

> Now to say that those who follow Gyana or Bhakti marga will also

> expirence KA is very bold statement. Every marga will give you

> ultimate knowledge but every marga will not be through Kundalini.

> The person who has fully activated Kundalini and person who has

> reached ultimate level in Bhakti marga will have same knowledge to

> share. Both will be realized souls and will have same knowledge.

But

> there means will be different. Bhakti marga is more popular as it

> is considered to be simple and safe. Most of the Santa are from

> Bhakti marga. So many feel that Bhakti marga Santa must have obtain

> knowledge through Kundalini activation.

>

> Since Kundalini activation experience is very difficult to express,

> Rishis have written Puranas and MahaKavyas(Ramayan & Mahabharat) to

> explain those hidden secrets with the help of stories and

> allegories. Once such story is of Kacha-Devayani-Shukracharya. It

> ends with the statement that Mantra should not be given to woman.(

> Read Gurucharitra). Shukrachary was forced to teach Sanjeevini

> (Kundalini is temporary death and Sanjeevini is life after such

> death) to his daughter. Shukracharya knew that this vidya should

not

> be given to woman but succumbed to the pressures put by his

> daughter. Shukracharya dies in the process and Devayani learns.

> Kacha as well learns as he was in the stomach of Shukracharya.

Kacha

> comes out in Bramha where as Devayani makes a strong request for

> marriage which Kacha turns down. Devayani hence curses Kacha that

he

> will not be able to use this vidya(like BhargavaRama cursed Karna

> in Mahabharata). In turn Kacha says that Devayani will not marry

> Brahman(Brahma Janati eti Brahmana)i.e will not be able to control

> Brahma. Finally Brihaspati curses to all Brahman that if anybody

> teaches Mantra(Kundalini Vidya) to woman he will go Rairaiva

Naraka.

>

> Those who believe in this story in this way strictly follow it.

> Others, who follow literally, suggest Vratas instead of Mantras to

> women.

>

> I was taught to read Ramayana and Mahabharata is this way. Just try

> to understand why Rama asked Laxyamana to cut Stana-Nak-Kana of

> Shoorpankha? or even, why Shiva and Brahma are enemies of each

> other? In YogaVashista, why Indra and Ahilya story comes again and

> again.(I dont exactly remember in which adhya as I read

YogaVashista

> seven to eight years back.)

>

> Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

> Jai Jai Shankara

> Har Har Shankar

>