Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Mooladharam/ Shri Narasimha & Shri Vishnu

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Now regarding Mooladhara - this is a question for both of you.You say Mooladhara

and Moolam is your Problem.Or rather first problem.Lets take one by one.Pls dont

jump to Sahasrara in one shot.

I have no problem whatsoever whether you consider chakras together or in

isolation. However, it is incumbent upon you to clearly map out where other

chakras fall in the natural zodiac so that we can have a more composite dialog.

 

Classical quotations are available on where is Mooladharam. Now how did you come

to the conclusion that it is at 180 degrees,which is no way near to

Guda/Linga/Thigh vicinity (180 and 240 are different right?)

..Can you support it through Tarka/Pramana.Pls answer this question.

Yes, I will to the best of knowledge and ability which are very limited. I had

clearly pointed out Mooladhaara/ Coccyx is above Guda/ Anal opening and you

agreed. Now you are again insisting it is in the thigh vicinity. How can

something that is above anal opening be in the thigh vicinity?

Everyone was very eager to atatck Chandrahari with rhetoric.I have asked this

question 10 times - but couldnt see any one attempting.

Don't construe my questioning as rhetoric. I don't have anything personal

against Sri.Chandra Hari. I have said this to Sri.Chandra Hari(personal mail)

and I repeat, just because he says Mooladhaara is in Dhanus and has "refuted

pages and pages of refree observations" don't expect me to tow line. I have

found gaps in his logic and rightfully pointed them out. It is upto him to

respond to them and defend his theory.

warm regards,

Vishnu-- Om Akhanda mandalaakaaramvyaptam yena charaa charamtatpadam darsita

yena tasmai sri gurave namah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sri Pradeep,

Namaste,

Yes

here lies the trick.When we consider above Guda alone we will never

think of thigh vicinity.For the same reason i had requested you to make

the test self. If

we check the Linga side we can see that thighs are conjuncting Linga

and this part is well above anal plane.This satisfies the understanding

of both of us.Kindly do this .

I disagree that thighs are conjuncting Linga! I don't know where you

are getting this from. What part is above anal plane? It would be

mutually beneficial if you can support your point with pictures.

 

Just

give a patient ear to him.I do not accept anybody blindly.You can take

this honestly from me.For the same reason,i have always said the

ayanamsha has to be experimented.But his theory of

Moola/Mooladhara,Gangadhara/Akasha Ganga etc can only be intutive

revelations.After reading some of his works ,i honestly feel we cannot

learn beyond a point through books.After a stage ,it has to be some

intution that gives bits of thoughts.

I will definitely wait for his other mails before coming to a

conclusion. But, I am no authority on astrology. I will experiment with

his ayanamsa only when I am convinced of its logical and mathematical

appeal, until then Lahiri is what I will stick to. There must be

certain objectivity to a theory and that is what his previous mail has

failed to drive home.

I know I will be antagonizing him and his students with my sincere views, I hope

you will appreciate my view point.

I

tell you when foundation,is strong - we can build further

as we wish.Thus challenge him,but dont be hasty in making

conclusions.Approach with a relaxed mind.Think he can be right as well

as wrong.

Agree.

warm regards,

Vishnu-- Om Akhanda mandalaakaaramvyaptam yena charaa charamtatpadam darsita

yena tasmai sri gurave namaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Shri Vishnu

 

We have no problem regarding the last two points.

Now please read the mail that i have written to shri Narasimha regarding point

1.

That is the plane,conjucnting thighs etc.

The painting link is sufficient enough to understand.If you can visualize the

slanted plane,then things would be clear.If we check our own anatomy,this is not

at all a difficult task.

If these are not enough ,then i may have to draw a theree dimensional diagram

and scan it.

 

Thanks

Pradeep

vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala <jvishnu@g...> wrote:

>

> || Hare Rama Krishna ||

>

> Dear Sri Pradeep,

>

> Namaste,

>

>

>

> > Yes here lies the trick.When we consider above Guda alone we will never

> > think of thigh vicinity.For the same reason i had requested you to make

> > the test self.

> > If we check the Linga side we can see that thighs are conjuncting Linga

> > and this part is well above anal plane.This satisfies the understanding of

> > both of us.Kindly do this .

>

>

> I disagree that thighs are conjuncting Linga! I don't know where you are

> getting this from. What part is above anal plane? It would be mutually

> beneficial if you can support your point with pictures.

>

>

>

> > Just give a patient ear to him.I do not accept anybody blindly.You can

> > take this honestly from me.For the same reason,i have always said the

> > ayanamsha has to be experimented.But his theory of

> > Moola/Mooladhara,Gangadhara/Akasha Ganga etc can only be intutive

> > revelations.After reading some of his works ,i honestly feel we cannot

> > learn beyond a point through books.After a stage ,it has to be some

> > intution that gives bits of thoughts.

>

>

> I will definitely wait for his other mails before coming to a conclusion.

> But, I am no authority on astrology. I will experiment with his ayanamsa

> only when I am convinced of its logical and mathematical appeal, until then

> Lahiri is what I will stick to. There must be certain objectivity to a

> theory and that is what his previous mail has failed to drive home.

>

> I know I will be antagonizing him and his students with my sincere views, I

> hope you will appreciate my view point.

>

>

> I tell you when foundation,is strong - we can build further as we

> > wish.Thus challenge him,but dont be hasty in making conclusions.Approachwith

a relaxed

> > mind.Think he can be right as well as wrong.

> >

> > Agree.

>

> warm regards,

> Vishnu

>

>

> --

> Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram

> vyaptam yena charaa charam

> tatpadam darsita yena

> tasmai sri gurave namaha

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...