D-charts and Transit in D-charts: As per Tamil Nadi texts?

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

In my previous mail to Narayan ji, I made a mistake. Instead of ROME

I typed ROM!! My apologies.

I remember a story. A professor was taking a class. After finishing

the 1st session he wrote on the board,

The CLASS should stay. The professor will continue from 11 AM.

And then went for a break, to have his tea. While the professor was

away, some of the students erased the "C" in the word CLASS. Now it

read,

The LASS should stay. The professor will continue from 11 AM.

When the professor returned the students were giggling sarcastically,

and he noticed the change in what he wrote on the board. He just went

up to the board and erased the "L" as well from the same word, and

simply continued with the class. )

You see, words are beautiful!! LEARN can change to EARN and CLASS can

change to ASS!!!

My apologies and in my future mails I will try to avoid such mistakes

(i.e. like instead of ROME to ROM etc).

Love,

Sreenadh

 

vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid>

wrote:

>

> Dear Iyer ji,

> Wait.....You cannot have them so easily!!...You should remember

that

> ROM was not built in a day!!!.... By the way, I am a really

> "practicing astrologer", not someone doing "pastime" in astrology!!

> Before you see what I have, let me see what you have!!! It is my

> freedom, Is it not?......)

> It is becoming a great joy to be a member of this forum!! I think

you

> will agree to that. ).

> By the way, there are so many discussions going along side, like

> 'Transit in D-charts' etc, are you not interested in them?!!

> Love,

> Sreenadh

>

>

> vedic astrology, "naaraayana_iyer" <jaimini.

> upadesa@g...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sreenadh,

> >

> > So what happened to those examples? Its just as I thought ... all

> > theory ... all preaching and no practice !

> >

> > -Narayan

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Sanjay ji,

> > > "D-charts and Transit in D-charts" are "not at all discussed in

> > Rishi

> > > Horas"!!! That is why those people who are giving propaganda to

> > this

> > > system is turning to Nadi texts of Kerala and Tamilnadu. That is

> > why a

> > > discussion of the same becomes necessary! Yes, I am also against

> > any

> > > kind of regionalizing in astrology.

> > > > can you please refer by the Rishi's text

> > > Thanks for that support!!!! I was asking the same to all

these

> > > after D-charts for the last many days.

> > > Love,

> > > Sreenadh

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Sanjay Prabhakaran

> > > <sanjaychettiar@g...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > || Om Gurave Namah ||

> > > >

> > > > Namaste Sreenadh,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > chart only, as far as the system prevalent in Kerala or

> > Tamilnadu is

> > > > > concerned. Hope, I got it right. "Many astrologers in

> > Tamilnadu

> > > are

> > > > > using the aspect in navamsa also". If here by the

> > word 'aspect'

> > > you

> > > > > combination (Yuthi) then, Yes, Yuthi in Navmsa is considered

> > in

> > > Kerala

> > > > > as well.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > Instead calling "Tamilnadu Astrology" and "Kerala astrology"

can

> > you

> > > please

> > > > refer by the Rishi's text (My jyotish may soon be called as

> > > Washington

> > > > Jyotish? ). The regional division of Jyotish is not helpful

> > > academically.

> > > > Even within Region there maybe so many variations. And knowing

> > about

> > > > regional variations in Not All helpful for Jyotish Study.

> > > >

> > > > So can we just refer the Rishi names for references and

> > > justification of

> > > > arguments.

> > > >

> > > > Warm Regards

> > > > Sanjay P

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

*|| OM MAHAGANAPATAYE NAMAH ||* Hariom, Dear Friends,

Much Heat on this thread,Isnt it?I quote

a part of writing FROM Vedic Astrology An integrated Approach Authored by Sh

PVR JI , hope this will clarify context of whole debate to some extent.

25.4 Transits and Divisional Charts.

Though motivation for the approach described here comes from some principles

described in classics, the actual approach is essentially based on the authors

own researches.The auther heard about" BHrigu Transits", which correlate the

transits positions in in Navamsa chart with the natal positions in rasi charts

..However he does not know much about the tradition of Bhrigu transits to

conclude whether or not his finding are loosely related to that tradition.

Though this auther prefers to teach only those approaches that have the sanction

of Maharshis, he finds this particular approach superior to most other

teachings of maharshis. This is also a fertile area for research and deserves

our attention.Hence it will be covered here.However , readers are advised to

keep in mind that what follows is a product of the very limited intelligence of

this auther and hence prone to errors.Readers are encouraged to conduct further

reseaches in this area.

.............. In another para '" We do not have different Zodiacs for different

divisional charts. All the divisional charts use the same Zodiac.So cancer in

Natal Navamsa chart and cancer in transit rasi chart are not different.They are

one and the same.If Jupitor transiting in cancer can influence the house and

planets stationed in Cancer in Rasi chart, he should be able to influence the

house and planets stationed in Cancer in Navamsa chart too!We can extend this

logic to all the divisional charts.

Obviously This book alone is not the only one in modern literature on Jyotish

there are also other exponent and software writers who has incorporated for

experimentation this and allied techniques of Gochar.Gorvani Jyotish Ver 2 had

Bhirgu transits , Digital jyotish has also it.

Anoter book Gochar phal darpan By COL A.K.Gaur from school of Vidhya Bhawan has

one full chapter on transits in Varga kundalies.

I dont see any conflict and obviously search in classical literature is likly to

be futile as far as application is related to transits in Divisional charts.Hope

above quote is relevent to some extent.

"Sreenadh" <sreelid >Re: D-charts and Transit in

D-charts: As per Tamil Nadi texts?Dear Iyer ji, Wait.....You cannot have them

so easily!!...You should remember that ROM was not built in a day!!!.... By the

way, I am a really "practicing astrologer", not someone doing "pastime" in

astrology!! Before you see what I have, let me see what you have!!! It is my

freedom, Is it not?......) It is becoming a great joy to be a member of this

forum!! I think you will agree to that. ). By the way, there are so many

discussions going along side, like 'Transit in D-charts' etc, are you not

interested in them?!!Love,Sreenadhvedic astrology,

"naaraayana_iyer" <jaimini.upadesa@g...> wrote:>> Dear Sreenadh,> > So what

happened to those examples? Its just as I thought ... all > theory ... all

preaching and no practice !> > -Narayan> > > --- In

vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid> > wrote:> >> > Dear

Sanjay ji,> > "D-charts and Transit in D-charts" are "not at all discussed in

> Rishi > > Horas"!!! That is why those people who are giving propaganda to >

this > > system is turning to Nadi texts of Kerala and Tamilnadu. That is > why

a > > discussion of the same becomes necessary! Yes, I am also against > any > >

kind of regionalizing in astrology.> > > can you please refer by the Rishi's

text> > Thanks for that support!!!! I was asking the same to all these > >

after D-charts for the last many days. > > Love,> > Sreenadh> > > > --- In

vedic astrology, Sanjay Prabhakaran > > <sanjaychettiar@g...>

wrote:> > >> > > || Om Gurave Namah ||> > > > > > Namaste Sreenadh,> > > > > >

> > > chart only, as far as the system prevalent in Kerala or > Tamilnadu is> >

> > concerned. Hope, I got it right. "Many astrologers in > Tamilnadu > > are> >

> > using the aspect in navamsa also". If here by the > word 'aspect' > > you> >

> > combination (Yuthi) then, Yes, Yuthi in Navmsa is considered > in > >

Kerala> > > > as well.> > > >> > > > > > Instead calling "Tamilnadu Astrology"

and "Kerala astrology" can > you > > please> > > refer by the Rishi's text (My

jyotish may soon be called as > > Washington> > > Jyotish? ). The regional

division of Jyotish is not helpful > > academically.> > > Even within Region

there maybe so many variations. And knowing > about> > > regional variations in

Not All helpful for Jyotish Study.> > > > > > So can we just refer the Rishi

names for references and > > justification of> > > arguments.> > > > > > Warm

Regards> > > Sanjay P> > >> >>

 

 

 

 

|| May all people be happy ||OM TAT SATR.C.Srivastava .swami_rcs mob

9412268768http://www.cosmograce.comhttp://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com