Guest guest Posted October 30, 2005 Report Share Posted October 30, 2005 dear partha sarathyji,inspired by your mail, presenting herebelow a puzzle for the benefit of all the members and expect large number of members participating in the same with different techniques and hope almost all members will be solving the same with 100% accuracy.puzzle: to find out the two important events in the native's life.native's details: 16.11.1958, 11.24 a.m., 81E32, 16N32. (chart in jhd format attached).1st event: 16.01.1992 (january), 10.15 a.m., 78E33, 17N27. (chart in jhd format attached).2nd event: 13/14.12.1992 (december), 04.06 hours, 75E19, 19N48. (chart in jhd format attached).wish you all a very very happy diwali and prosperous new year. hope all will solve this puzzle with flying colours. with best wishes and regards to all elders.tvr9422203510-----Original Message----- vedic astrology[vedic astrology]On Behalf Of V.Partha sarathySaturday, October 29, 2005 4:54 PMTo: vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Rasi and div charts (Pradeep) ShriNarasimha - 4SirAstrology will not be proved by participating in theoretical debates.Participate in few puzzles and quizzes and show us your talentinstead of talking about theoriesBest wishespartha--- In vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid>wrote:>> Dear Chandra Sekhar ji,> You said it right! Why it is so? That is why it is necessary tohave> a look back at the basics.> In astrology any one with little effort could clearly visualizethat,> basically 4 items are important as they serve as the significatorsof> many things. They are 1-Rasi, 2-Bhava, 3-Planet. To draw some real> predictions out of the numerous things for which these three are> significators 7 combinations as I have described in my previousmail> is used. The same principle is used to deal with Vargas as well.All> other branches are just secondary to this fundamental idea. Thisway> can't you see how simple it is to get a complete picture ofastrology> ?! Now we should start learning each of these branches in detail. I> think it is the right approach as the Rishi horas supports thisview.> Now coming to BPHS, Vedic/Non-vedic controversy or the like, it is> more related to history than to astrology. Only thing the real> astrologers should worry about is - how to predict (with Sign-House-> Plant etc and the whole bunch of data we have) correctly? Mostlythey> would be worried about one more thing as well in the current> situation, that is - whether astrology is correct or not? In> controversies like the one Mohan ji initiates (BPHS, Vedic/Non-vedic> controversy etc) we should participate with enthusiasm as it is not> directly linked to astrology (if astrology is right).> Love,> Sreenadh>>> Message: 24 > Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:09:25 -0700 (PDT)> Chandra Sekhar <chandra_sekhar1970>> Re: Re: Rasi and div charts (Pradeep) Shri Narasimha - 4>> Dear friends,> > It is confusion everywhere. Some Jyotsi says there was no Parasara> Hora, some claims Rasi and some says only Varga. How come theexperts> speak> so incoherently? All qualified people, very intelligent people who> have> shown their excellence in modern scientific sphere and talking like> blind men who have gone to see the elephant. What can be morefunny?> What is fundamental in astrology? Planetary positions or their> derivatives? What is more important - actual date of birth orannual> birth day? > In science, a spurious text book will be identified and weeded out> immediately. Whatever a text book may contradict, two teachers of> Physics> won't contradict the Newton's laws. But here the qualifiedastrologers> are in conflict over fundamental things.> Shall astrology come out of all these uncertainties? Are these> uncertainties a product of astrology itself or of the minds of> astrologers?> > chandra sekhar>------------------------ Sponsor --------------------~-->Click here to rescue a little child from a life of poverty.http://us.click./rAWabB/gYnLAA/i1hLAA/.8XolB/TM--~->Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......|| Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || Links<*> vedic astrology/<*> To from this group, send an email to: vedic astrology<*> Your Attachment: [not stored] Attachment: [not stored] Attachment: [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2005 Report Share Posted October 30, 2005 Namaste, 1) Event on 16.1.1992 indicates a Positive Happening. It presume that It can be a "Santan Labh" OR a Promotion & change of place for good in Profession. In Brief, Rahu/Sun Running. Sun is with 5th & 9th lord and in Constellation of Jupiter the putrakarka well placed in 10th. Sun is well placed w.r.t Rahu, the Mahadasha Nath. It is placed in 11th (Fullfillment of Desires), aspecting 5th house, with 5th & 9th lord and Aspected by 11th lord placed in 5th. In TP 91, Sun & Mars placed in 9th (5th from 5th). Moon, the 5th lord is strongly aspected by despositor Mars from 9th house. Horalord Saturn in 11th looks at 5th. 2) Event on 14.12.1992 seems to a Negative one in terms of Married life/wife. Moon the antardasha lord is a 7th lord & aspects its own house. it is aspected by Rahu & placed in Nakshatra of Sun who is a Char Darakaraka. it is placed with Nodes in Navamnasha. In Transit, Moon, the 7th lord & Sun the DK both are afflicted by Transit of Saturn & Rahu respectively. the focuss seems to be 7th house. in TP of 92, Sun as 9th cum UL lord placed in 12th with Rahu. Venus as Malefic Aspets 7th house and the 7th lord Mercury which is Badhakesh is aspected by Satrun, Mars. best regards & Happy Diwali Utpal tvrao <tvrao_agd (AT) sancharnet (DOT) in> wrote: dear partha sarathyji,inspired by your mail, presenting herebelow a puzzle for the benefit of all the members and expect large number of members participating in the same with different techniques and hope almost all members will be solving the same with 100% accuracy.puzzle: to find out the two important events in the native's life.native's details: 16.11.1958, 11.24 a.m., 81E32, 16N32. (chart in jhd format attached).1st event: 16.01.1992 (january), 10.15 a.m., 78E33, 17N27. (chart in jhd format attached).2nd event: 13/14.12.1992 (december), 04.06 hours, 75E19, 19N48. (chart in jhd format attached).wish you all a very very happy diwali and prosperous new year. hope all will solve this puzzle with flying colours. with best wishes and regards to all elders.tvr9422203510-----Original Message----- vedic astrology[vedic astrology]On Behalf Of V.Partha sarathySaturday, October 29, 2005 4:54 PMTo: vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Rasi and div charts (Pradeep) ShriNarasimha - 4SirAstrology will not be proved by participating in theoretical debates.Participate in few puzzles and quizzes and show us your talentinstead of talking about theoriesBest wishespartha--- In vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid>wrote:>> Dear Chandra Sekhar ji,> You said it right! Why it is so? That is why it is necessary tohave> a look back at the basics.> In astrology any one with little effort could clearly visualizethat,> basically 4 items are important as they serve as the significatorsof> many things. They are 1-Rasi, 2-Bhava, 3-Planet. To draw some real> predictions out of the numerous things for which these three are> significators 7 combinations as I have described in my previousmail> is used. The same principle is used to deal with Vargas as well.All> other branches are just secondary to this fundamental idea. Thisway> can't you see how simple it is to get a complete picture ofastrology> ?! Now we should start learning each of these branches in detail. I> think it is the right approach as the Rishi horas supports thisview.> Now coming to BPHS, Vedic/Non-vedic controversy or the like, it is> more related to history than to astrology. Only thing the real> astrologers should worry about is - how to predict (with Sign-House-> Plant etc and the whole bunch of data we have) correctly? Mostlythey> would be worried about one more thing as well in the current> situation, that is - whether astrology is correct or not? In> controversies like the one Mohan ji initiates (BPHS, Vedic/Non-vedic> controversy etc) we should participate with enthusiasm as it is not> directly linked to astrology (if astrology is right).> Love,> Sreenadh>>> Message: 24 > Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:09:25 -0700 (PDT)> Chandra Sekhar <chandra_sekhar1970>> Re: Re: Rasi and div charts (Pradeep) Shri Narasimha - 4>> Dear friends,> > It is confusion everywhere. Some Jyotsi says there was no Parasara> Hora, some claims Rasi and some says only Varga. How come theexperts> speak> so incoherently? All qualified people, very intelligent people who> have> shown their excellence in modern scientific sphere and talking like> blind men who have gone to see the elephant. What can be morefunny?> What is fundamental in astrology? Planetary positions or their> derivatives? What is more important - actual date of birth orannual> birth day? > In science, a spurious text book will be identified and weeded out> immediately. Whatever a text book may contradict, two teachers of> Physics> won't contradict the Newton's laws. But here the qualifiedastrologers> are in conflict over fundamental things.> Shall astrology come out of all these uncertainties? Are these> uncertainties a product of astrology itself or of the minds of> astrologers?> > chandra sekhar>------------------------ Sponsor --------------------~-->Click here to rescue a little child from a life of poverty.http://us.click./rAWabB/gYnLAA/i1hLAA/.8XolB/TM--~->Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......|| Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: vedic astrology/<*> To from this group, send an email to: vedic astrology<*> Your use of is subject to: FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2005 Report Share Posted November 1, 2005 You are correct.The 18:20 person is more spiritual and he is sadhak.The other person is working in USA.Both of them are engineers.I am glad you replied to this. Both charts have parivrajya yoga.12th from AK is occupied by ketu and jupiter.But still if you see the spiritual progress in both these people , the 18:20 is a spiritual person and the other is not spiritual.(The kumbha raasi exists for 2.5 days and all the persons born on these 2.5 days cannot be parivrajya.) I am very much interested in knowing how these differences can be predicted.Guruji's can help us in identifying the fine difference. Thanks, Madeswaran. vaysadeva1008 <vaysadeva1008 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Namskarin first look. The first native (time of birth is 18.20)is in vedicactivities what i think.jupiter and ketu trine to Navmansh varggotma lagna ..please give medetail ansr of these natives what they are doing and how youcaculated just to improve my knowledge.I am saying this as no memberhave touched this yetRegards.vedic astrology, "Mades" wrote:>> Dear Astro pandits,> Here are the horo of the two persons born on the same day> with just two hour time difference.Can some body predict what will> these two people will be doing at this time(profession) and also> their interest in spirituality.I am quiet curious to know therules> that you had applied for finding this.>> Horo 1:> Date : 13-01-1978> Time : 18:20> Time zone : 5:30 E of GMT> Longitude : 77 46E> Latitude : 11 20N>> Horo 2 :> Date : 13-01-1978> Time : 16:20> Time zone : 5:30 E of GMT> Longitude : 77 46E> Latitude : 11 20N>> Thanks,> Madeswaran.> FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.