Aspect of Yogakaraka being a natural malefic.To SVayambu

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

 

 

>1. It is said that a natural malefic (NM) disturbs

the houses it aspects.

 

ANS:Yes,it is true.How ever its vision on its own

house,would strength its own house.

 

> What happens when the NM is a yogakara for

that chart ? For example what will be the effect of

Saturn being yogakaraka for Libra lagna stationed in

the 10th house in Cancer ?

 

ANS:Yes,even than its vision disturbs but however its

vision on its own house would strengthen the house.

 

> 2. When do Moon and Mercury become natural malefics.

Some books say that Krishna-paksha Moon and Badly

associated mercury are malefics ?

 

ANS:yes myself too belongs to the same school of

thought as is said in some books .Moon is a natural

malefic from Krishna Trayodasi to Amavasya & Mercury

is a malefic when associated with other natural

malefic.

 

>Does "badly associated" mean aspected by natural

malefics or does it mean conjoined with natural

malefics.

 

ANS:Badly associated means conjoined with natural

malefic.

[Malefic aspected Mercury's vision shall not cause any

harm,but malefic associated Mercury's vision would

cause harm ].

 

I know your are unambigious ,please confirm my

understanding on the above theory.

 

 

 

 

-- svayambu <svayambu wrote:

 

> Dear Gurus

>

> Please provide your advice on the following

> questions.

>

> 1. It is said that a natural malefic (NM) disturbs

> the houses it

> aspects. What happens when the NM is a yogakara for

> that crt ? For

> example what will be the effect of Saturn being

> yogakaraka for Libra

> lagna stationed in the 10th house in Cancer ?

>

> 2. When do Moon and Mercury become natural malefics.

> Some books say

> that Krishna-paksha Moon and Badly associated

> mercury are malefics ?

> Does "badly associated" mean aspected by natural

> malefics or does it

> mean conjoined with natural malefics. I am a little

> confused here.

>

>

> I appreciate your assistance.

>

> Svayambu

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005