Queries for Shri Sanjay Rath - All querie/Panditji

[Guest guest]

Namaste Panditji

 

Once again i express my thanks for your encouragement.

I have scribbled whatever i know on the topic as a pdf file.I have

plans to prepare a detailed paper with example charts,including

Karakamsha results.This is just a part of the same.

 

Kindly read and give your views.

I had once addressed this directly to shri K.N.Raoji and expressed my

understanding on karakamsha lagna,which he has proposed.Other lagna

vargas like dashamsha,nvamsha etc should e no different from

karakamsha analysis.

Scholars like Shri K.Chandra Hari has clearly expressed similar views

even before i have started learning Jyotish.

Sreenadh another learned member too has written on his papers ,what a

Bhava is.

I will try to address this again to Shri Raoji.

 

Respect

Pradeep

 

 

vedic astrology, Panditji <navagraha@g...> wrote:

> Namaste Vijaydas,

> I have read your past mails with great interest and after flipping

through

> some of the classics, I find no conclusive evidence that amshas

should be

> used as bhavas. There are a couple of shlokas that people have mentioned

> here which can be interpreted as may be the sage wanted to use

aspects in

> divisions. But I don't think one can base an entire thesis on a few

threads.

> The camps are divided and I commend you for your perseverence and

honestly

> looking at what has been said in the classics, instead of getting

trapped

> into blind following.

> I rarely used divisional charts except to look at graha bala, but after

> reading your posts I am convinced that a fresh look into this theory of

> divisional charts needs to be looked at at analyzed thoroughly. I must

> concede that they provide a great tool to explain away things that

are known

> and if one has to write books and articles it is a good space

filler. KN Rao

> has also mentioned these in his books, but I am not sure how much he

relies

> on these so called divisional charts to actually arrive at his

conclusions (

> Only he can answer that).

> I have seen many people say "divisional chart won't give what rashi

chart

> promises", but many go directly to the concerned divisional chart for

> prediction. I think what is promised by rashi kundali can be looked into

> rashi kundali alone. I think we need to concentrate on how to unlock the

> secrets of the rashi kundali, integrating it with amshas etc.

> I do not know how active KN Rao is these days, but if you have not

already

> done so, please ask him these query of yours.We have gone through this

> exercise on this list before and results have been people who are

entreched

> in their positions conforming their entrechments. Finally the proof

is in

> predictive ability, if you can do so using whatever technique all

the power

> to you.

> ...

>

> On 10/3/05, vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Shri Sanjay Rath ji

> >

> > Please find the following as sincere queries.

> > The time and effort that i have spent over vargas,has been pointed out

> > by an SJC member as rude,non grateful,non sincere behaviour.

> > No worries.What am i doing here,am i quarelling over property

> > oundaries!!! Arent We engaged in a mutual exercise of sharing and

> > learning.

> >

> >

> > Please answer the following queries,if your kind self feels so.It will

> > help one and everyone.

> >

> > 1)Do we have any authority to,arrange and analyse Bhavas in groups of

> > ''individual amshas'',resulting in non astronomical order.

> > Do we have multiple positions for planets and lagna.Arent we just

> > finding the harmonic mathematical relationship in individual

> > fashion.Is not Kalyan Verma very clear.

> >

> > If multiple,then why should sage,teach us astronomy.In Rashi Chakra,it

> > is not an arrangement from us,it has already been arranged in

> > heaven.Isnt,Bhava Niroopana in Rashi Chakra

> > based on the exact astronomical order of planets.

> >

> > 2)Can two planets placed astronomically ,15 degrees apart, cast poorna

> > drishti(full aspect),just because we arrange them in order after

> > finding their amshas.

> > If so,then why should Mahamuni Parashara waste his energy over

> > aspectual rules.Can we even imagine such and still be proud of our

> > intellectual heritage!!!!!!

> > Why are we finding it difficult to understand views of

> > Santhanam,D.V.Subbu Rao,if not the numerous local scholars,(not

> > popular),having acces to fresh and noncorrupted classical views.

> >

> >

> > 3)Arent Amshas individual harmonic relationship of planets with

> > various signs from their natal position.

> > For example,while thinking of Navamsha - a planet is related through

> > number 9,with one among the various sign divisions, of its dispositing

> > sign.

> > Similarly we take another planet and find its navamsha.That too is

> > individually related.

> > But do they attain any mutual relationship,just because we arrange

> > them, as if in heaven.

> >

> > 4)Do we have anyother way ,than to find vargas for our natal rising

> > degree and Planets.

> >

> > 5)If we sincerely go ack to basics,cant we understand why we care

> > unable to find even a single reference for Bhavas in a detailed text

> > like Saravali,especially as Kalyan Varma has reiterated the importance

> > of amshas.

> >

> > I request your good self to honestly attempt this queries.OM NAMA

> > SHIVAYA.Kindly reply.

> >

> > Respect

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> >

> >

> > ------------------------------

> >

> >

> >

> > - Visit your group

"vedic astrology<vedic astrology>"

> > on the web.

> > -

> >

vedic astrology<vedic astrology-@gro\

ups.com?subject=Un>

> > - Terms of

> > Service <>.

> >

> >

> > ------------------------------

> >